Arias Ana, Ribeiro J M, Tsalidis G, Renfrew D, Dias D, Avramidi Maria, Kyriazi Maria, Moreira Maria Teresa, Katsou E
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Imperial College of London, South Kensington Campus, London SW72AZ, United Kingdom; CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain.
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Imperial College of London, South Kensington Campus, London SW72AZ, United Kingdom.
Water Res. 2025 Aug 15;287(Pt B):124406. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124406.
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are evolving from pollution control facilities into resource recovery hubs, aligning with circular economy principles. However, assessing their transition requires robust methodologies that integrate environmental, economic, and circularity dimensions. This study aims to evaluate the sustainability and circularity performance of a WWTP in Cyprus upgraded with additional treatment stages to recover nutrient-rich sludge for fertilizer and treated water for irrigation. To achieve this, a combined methodological framework was applied, incorporating standardized Circularity Assessment (based on ISO 59,004), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and Life Cycle Costing (LCC). Circularity was assessed using a dual-indicator approach: "resource flow indicators" (covering material, energy, and economic flows) and "circular actions indicators" (capturing process optimization, repurposing, cascading, and regeneration). Environmental and economic impacts were quantified using LCA and LCC, respectively, while sensitivity analyses explored the effects of renewable energy integration and process simplification. Results show that while the upgraded WWTP enhances circularity through increased resource recovery and high-value product generation, it also incurs higher environmental impacts and operational costs due to energy-intensive technologies (distillation, reverse osmosis, and nanofiltration), increasing the impacts in values that can achieve +60 % in some impact categories. Sensitivity scenarios demonstrated that reducing energy demand and increasing renewable energy use can improve sustainability outcomes, with the higher average impact reduction achieving -20 %, though often at the expense of circularity performance. The study highlights the trade-offs between maximizing resource recovery and minimizing environmental and economic burdens, emphasizing the need for optimized process design and supportive policy frameworks to enable WWTPs to function as effective circular economy enablers. The findings show that advanced treatment technologies enhance circularity through increased resource recovery, but also entail elevated energy demands and limited economic viability. While frameworks like ISO 59,004 support multidimensional assessment, further methodological development is needed to guide sustainable decision-making.
污水处理厂(WWTPs)正在从污染控制设施转变为资源回收中心,以符合循环经济原则。然而,评估它们的转型需要强大的方法,将环境、经济和循环维度整合起来。本研究旨在评估塞浦路斯一家经过升级、增加了处理阶段以回收富含营养的污泥用于肥料生产和处理水用于灌溉的污水处理厂的可持续性和循环性能。为此,应用了一个综合方法框架,包括标准化的循环评估(基于ISO 59004)、生命周期评估(LCA)和生命周期成本核算(LCC)。使用双指标方法评估循环性:“资源流指标”(涵盖物质、能源和经济流)和“循环行动指标”(捕捉过程优化、再利用、级联和再生)。分别使用LCA和LCC量化环境和经济影响,同时敏感性分析探讨了可再生能源整合和流程简化的影响。结果表明,虽然升级后的污水处理厂通过增加资源回收和高价值产品生产提高了循环性,但由于能源密集型技术(蒸馏、反渗透和纳滤),它也产生了更高的环境影响和运营成本,在某些影响类别中影响值增加可达+60%。敏感性情景表明,降低能源需求和增加可再生能源使用可以改善可持续性结果,平均影响降低幅度更高可达-20%,尽管这通常会以循环性能为代价。该研究强调了在最大化资源回收与最小化环境和经济负担之间的权衡,强调需要优化工艺设计和支持性政策框架,以使污水处理厂能够有效地成为循环经济的推动者。研究结果表明,先进的处理技术通过增加资源回收提高了循环性,但也带来了更高的能源需求和有限的经济可行性。虽然像ISO 59004这样的框架支持多维度评估,但还需要进一步的方法开发来指导可持续决策。