• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Sacral Ala-Transverse Process Approach for the Treatment of Far-Lateral Disc Herniation at L5/S1: A Technical Note and Case Series.

作者信息

Zheng Bin, Yu Panfeng, Ma Ke, Liu Haiying, Liang Yan

机构信息

Spine Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Orthopedics Department, Huailai County Hospital, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2025 Aug 25;202:124406. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124406.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124406
PMID:40865720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Far lateral L5/S1 disc herniations are challenging due to the high iliac crest and enlarged L5 transverse process blocking the transforaminal corridor. This study introduces a percutaneous endoscopic discectomy via the sacral ala-transverse process approach to overcome these challenges while preserving spinal stability.

METHODS

Patients with far-lateral L5/S1 disc herniations underwent percutaneous endoscopic discectomy through the sacral ala-transverse process approach under fluoroscopic guidance. Key steps included targeting the sacral ala-transverse process approach with minimal resection of bone to access the extraforaminal fragment, followed by endoscopic removal of the herniation. Pain and disability were evaluated using the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index preoperatively and postoperatively. Operative time and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed successfully. Patients achieved significant improvement: mean leg visual analog scale decreased from 7.8 to 2.2, and mean Oswestry Disability Index dropped from 52.8 to 16.9. The average operative time was 64.33 ± 3.96 minutes. No major complications occurred, with no neurological deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

The sacral ala-transverse process approach enabled effective decompression of far-lateral L5/S1 disc herniations, addressing the anatomical constraints of this level. The technique provided excellent pain relief and functional recovery, offering a safe, effective alternative to traditional open surgery at L5/S1.

摘要

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Sacral Ala-Transverse Process Approach for the Treatment of Far-Lateral Disc Herniation at L5/S1: A Technical Note and Case Series.
World Neurosurg. 2025 Aug 25;202:124406. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124406.
2
Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy for L3/4 and L4/5 Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation: Clinical Outcomes and Technical Note.经椎间孔入路经皮内镜下L3/4和L4/5椎间孔及椎间孔外型腰椎间盘突出症切除术:临床疗效及技术要点
Asian J Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 10;20(2):337-343. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1805018. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Translaminar contralateral endoscopic foraminotomy for foraminal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation at L5-S1.经椎板对侧内镜下椎间孔切开术治疗L5-S1椎间孔狭窄和腰椎间盘突出症
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Aug 25;141:111566. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111566.
4
Endoscopic discectomy for L4-L5 disc herniation: percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy vs. unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy.L4-L5椎间盘突出症的内镜下椎间盘切除术:经皮内镜椎间孔切开椎间盘切除术与单侧双通道内镜椎间盘切除术的比较
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 20;12:1565165. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1565165. eCollection 2025.
5
Endoscopic Interlaminar Standalone Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis With Subligamentous Disc Herniation: A Disc-Preserving Alternative to Discectomy.内镜下单纯椎间孔减压治疗伴后纵韧带下椎间盘突出的腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症:一种保留椎间盘的椎间盘切除术替代方法
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):2093-2102. doi: 10.1111/os.70087. Epub 2025 May 31.
6
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniation.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧腰椎间盘突出症的对比
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Aug 4;48(1):588. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03748-y.
7
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.微创椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术/开放椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2.
8
A comparative study of transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc Herniation: Systematic review.经皮内镜下L5-S1椎间盘突出症椎间孔入路与椎板间入路的比较研究:系统评价
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar;133:111022. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.111022. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
9
Local Anesthesia With 1% Lidocaine Versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy at L5/S1 Disc Herniation: A Prospective Randomized Study.1%利多卡因局部麻醉与全身麻醉用于L5/S1椎间盘突出症经皮内镜椎间孔切开髓核摘除术的前瞻性随机研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Aug 1;38(7):E364-E370. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001743. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
10
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Using a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内镜下经椎间孔入路与椎板间入路治疗L5S1腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:412-420.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.075. Epub 2018 May 18.