Kato Takahiro, Yagi Yusuke, Maruyama Takumi, Hamada Yukihiro
Department of Pharmacy, Kochi Medical School Hospital, Nankoku-City 783-8505, Japan.
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Kochi Medical School Hospital, Nankoku-City 783-8505, Japan.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;14(8):737. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080737.
Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-Es) pose a significant global threat with notable increases in prevalence worldwide. Carbapenems are often used as the first line of treatment. However, their overuse accelerates resistance development, highlighting the urgent need for clinically viable carbapenem-sparing strategies. Cefmetazole (CMZ) and flomoxef (FMOX) are parenteral antibiotics that are widely used in Japan and have emerged as potential carbapenem alternatives. Repositioning these agents effectively addresses the clinical need for carbapenem-sparing strategies and outpatient ESBL-E management. This review aims to reposition CMZ and FMOX for real-world clinical practice by synthesizing basic research, clinical studies, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKs/PDs) analyses, which suggest that these agents may be effective in treating ESBL-E infections-particularly urinary tract infections, as evidenced by their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. The clinical outcomes of these interventions have been comparable to those of carbapenems, which support their role in antimicrobial stewardship. Their PK/PD characteristics emphasize the importance of dose optimization to ensure therapeutic efficacy, whereas recent insights into resistance mechanisms provide a foundation for appropriate use. As novel antibiotic development takes substantial time, revisiting existing options is increasingly important. Notably, the Infectious Diseases Society of America's 2024 guidance on antimicrobial resistance has omitted CMZ and FMOX, owing to which clinicians have limited guidance on their use, particularly in regions like Japan where these antibiotics are widely employed. By addressing this knowledge gap, the present review offers a comprehensive evaluation of these drugs and highlights their potential as intravenous agents in ESBL-E management. Furthermore, it highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring effective oral step-down therapy in an outpatient setting to reinforce the global relevance of CMZ and FMOX in a broader treatment framework, underscoring their potential for outpatient administration where clinically appropriate.
由产超广谱β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌(ESBL-Es)引起的感染在全球构成重大威胁,其在全球范围内的患病率显著上升。碳青霉烯类药物常被用作一线治疗药物。然而,它们的过度使用加速了耐药性的发展,凸显了临床上可行的碳青霉烯类药物节省策略的迫切需求。头孢美唑(CMZ)和氟氧头孢(FMOX)是在日本广泛使用的胃肠外抗生素,已成为潜在的碳青霉烯类替代药物。重新定位这些药物有效地满足了碳青霉烯类药物节省策略和门诊ESBL-E管理的临床需求。本综述旨在通过综合基础研究、临床研究和药代动力学/药效学(PKs/PDs)分析,将CMZ和FMOX重新定位到实际临床实践中,这些分析表明这些药物可能对治疗ESBL-E感染有效,尤其是尿路感染,其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)值证明了这一点。这些干预措施的临床结果与碳青霉烯类药物相当,这支持了它们在抗菌药物管理中的作用。它们的PK/PD特性强调了剂量优化以确保治疗效果的重要性,而最近对耐药机制的见解为合理使用提供了基础。由于新型抗生素的研发需要大量时间,重新审视现有选择变得越来越重要。值得注意的是,美国传染病学会2024年关于抗菌药物耐药性的指南遗漏了CMZ和FMOX,因此临床医生对其使用的指导有限,特别是在日本等广泛使用这些抗生素的地区。通过填补这一知识空白,本综述对这些药物进行了全面评估,并强调了它们作为静脉用药在ESBL-E管理中的潜力。此外,它强调了在门诊环境中确保有效的口服降阶梯治疗的持续挑战,以加强CMZ和FMOX在更广泛治疗框架中的全球相关性,强调它们在临床合适时门诊给药的潜力。