• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用分支型腔内移植物与开放性主动脉弓手术进行胸主动脉腔内修复术

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using a Branched Endograft Versus Open Arch Surgery.

作者信息

Kudo Tomoaki, Kuratani Toru, Sawa Yoshiki, Miyagawa Shigeru

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5837. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165837.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14165837
PMID:40869664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12387050/
Abstract

This study investigated whether branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (bTEVAR), a treatment for distal aortic arch diseases, could serve as an alternative to open aortic surgery (OAS). This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study comprised 80 patients (bTEVAR, n = 28; TAR, n = 52) treated from October 2012 to June 2018. The median age and median follow-up periods were 73 years (interquartile range [IQR], 66-79 years) and 6.0 years (IQR, 2.8-9.7 years). The patients in the bTEVAR group were older than those in the OAS group ( < 0.001), and the EuroSCORE2 was significantly higher in the bTEVAR group (6.6%) than in the OAS group (2.4%; < 0.001). There were no 30-day or in-hospital mortalities in either group. Stroke was observed in four (5.0%) patients, all of whom were in the bTEVAR group ( = 0.013). However, no other significant differences were observed between the two groups in other early aortic events. Kaplan-Meier curves regarding the survival, aorta-related death, and aortic events showed no significant differences between the two groups. Although bTEVAR involves an older patient population and a higher surgical risk, the early and mid-term outcomes were comparable to those of OAS, except for cerebral infarction. However, because cerebral infarction significantly reduces a patient's quality of life, for bTEVAR to become more widespread, it is necessary to reduce the incidence of cerebral infarction.

摘要

本研究调查了用于治疗主动脉弓远端疾病的分支型胸主动脉腔内修复术(bTEVAR)能否作为开放主动脉手术(OAS)的替代方案。这项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究纳入了2012年10月至2018年6月期间接受治疗的80例患者(bTEVAR组,n = 28;OAS组,n = 52)。中位年龄和中位随访期分别为73岁(四分位间距[IQR],66 - 79岁)和6.0年(IQR,2.8 - 9.7年)。bTEVAR组患者比OAS组患者年龄更大(< 0.001),且bTEVAR组的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE2)显著高于OAS组(6.6%比2.4%;< 0.001)。两组均无30天或住院期间死亡病例。4例(5.0%)患者发生卒中,所有患者均在bTEVAR组(P = 0.013)。然而,两组在其他早期主动脉事件方面未观察到其他显著差异。关于生存、主动脉相关死亡和主动脉事件的Kaplan-Meier曲线显示两组之间无显著差异。尽管bTEVAR涉及的患者年龄较大且手术风险较高,但除脑梗死外,其早期和中期结果与OAS相当。然而,由于脑梗死会显著降低患者的生活质量,为使bTEVAR更广泛应用,有必要降低脑梗死的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/12387050/252cd44e2484/jcm-14-05837-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/12387050/d92f0244cabf/jcm-14-05837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/12387050/252cd44e2484/jcm-14-05837-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/12387050/d92f0244cabf/jcm-14-05837-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef2f/12387050/252cd44e2484/jcm-14-05837-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using a Branched Endograft Versus Open Arch Surgery.使用分支型腔内移植物与开放性主动脉弓手术进行胸主动脉腔内修复术
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 18;14(16):5837. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165837.
2
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 23;2014(1):CD004178. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004178.pub2.
3
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.破裂性腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4.
4
Outcomes following staged versus synchronous cervical debranching to optimize proximal landing zones for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the aortic arch.分期与同期颈椎去分支术优化主动脉弓胸段血管腔内修复近端着陆区后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Aug;82(2):401-408.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.026. Epub 2025 Apr 19.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Inner Branched Stent-Graft in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease: A Systematic Review.内分支支架型人工血管治疗主动脉弓疾病的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Aug 30:15266028231197395. doi: 10.1177/15266028231197395.
6
Systematic Review on Customized and Non-customized Device Techniques for the Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch.系统评价定制和非定制设备技术在主动脉弓血管腔内修复中的应用。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Aug;31(4):505-521. doi: 10.1177/15266028221133701. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 21(7):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub3.
9
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
10
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of open and hybrid endovascular repair for aortic arch: a multi-centre study of 1052 adult patients.主动脉弓部腔内修复与杂交手术治疗的对比:一项 1052 例成年患者的多中心研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 4;66(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae377.
2
Multicenter Comparison of Aortic Arch Aneurysms and Dissections Zone 0 Hybrid and Total Endovascular Repair.多中心主动脉弓动脉瘤和夹层区域 0 杂交与全腔内修复的比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1674-1683. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03607-7. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
3
Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endografts for Partial and Total Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
带开窗和分支的腔内移植物用于主动脉弓部分和全腔内修复的结果——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Jan;67(1):106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.048. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
4
A Systematic Review of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair: A Promising Technology.全腔内主动脉弓修复术的系统评价:一项有前景的技术
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Jan;39(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Effectiveness of Proximal Landing Zones 0, 1, and 2 Hybrid Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single Centre 12 Year Experience.近端着陆区 0、1 和 2 杂交型胸主动脉腔内修复术的有效性:单中心 12 年经验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Mar;63(3):410-420. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.10.043. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
6
Total arch replacement in octogenarians.高龄患者全弓置换术。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan 18;34(2):283-290. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab256.
7
Early and midterm results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using a branched endograft for aortic arch pathologies: A retrospective single-center study.使用分支型血管内移植物治疗主动脉弓病变的胸主动脉腔内修复术的早期和中期结果:一项回顾性单中心研究。
JTCVS Tech. 2020 Sep 26;4:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.09.023. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Outcomes of intact thoracic endovascular aortic repair in octogenarians.高龄患者胸主动脉腔内修复术的治疗效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):882-892.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.039. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians.八旬和九旬老人的胸主动脉腔内修复术
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.04.066. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
The impact of age on patients undergoing aortic arch surgery: Evidence from a multicenter national registry.年龄对接受主动脉弓手术患者的影响:来自一项全国多中心注册研究的证据。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Sep;162(3):759-766.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.032. Epub 2020 Feb 19.