Brunken Fenna, Bullert Benno, Morlock Livia, Gierse Jula, Grützner Paul A, Vetter Sven Y, Beisemann Nils
BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Department for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery at Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5896. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165896.
: Dorsal screw protrusion or intra-articular screw penetration at the distal radius can cause extensor tendon injuries or articular surface damage. Despite the use of various views, the detection of screw misplacement remains limited in 2D fluoroscopy. This study compares the sensitivity of 2D and 3D fluoroscopy for detecting screw misplacement at the distal radius. : Volar locking plates were placed in six cadaveric forearms, and dorsal or intra-articular screw misplacement was induced. For each screw position, images were acquired by 2D and 3D fluoroscopy and assessed by three blinded observers. Sensitivity and specificity, inter-rater agreement, and observer confidence were evaluated. The dose area product (DAP) was measured separately for 2D and 3D fluoroscopy. : Three-dimensional fluoroscopy showed higher sensitivities for detecting dorsal (97.22%) and intra-articular (95.83%) screw misplacements than two-dimensional fluoroscopy. In 2D fluoroscopy, sensitivity for detecting dorsal screw protrusions improved from 63.89 to 75.00-77.78% with the inclusion of tangential views. For intra-articular penetrations, sensitivity in 2D fluoroscopy increased from 79.17 to 83.33% with the addition of oblique views. Observer confidence was higher in 3D fluoroscopy. DAP was significantly higher in 3D (42.4 ± 0.4 cGycm) compared to 2D fluoroscopy (14.2 ± 3.7 cGycm) ( < 0.0001). : Compared to 2D fluoroscopy, 3D fluoroscopy improves the detection of screw misplacement at the distal radius. However, its routine use is constrained by increased radiation exposure and limited availability. If 3D fluoroscopy is not accessible, the addition of dorsal tangential and oblique views may improve the sensitivity of 2D fluoroscopy.
桡骨远端的背侧螺钉突出或关节内螺钉穿透可导致伸肌腱损伤或关节面损伤。尽管使用了各种视图,但在二维透视下,螺钉误置的检测仍然有限。本研究比较了二维和三维透视检测桡骨远端螺钉误置的敏感性。:在六个尸体前臂中放置掌侧锁定钢板,并诱导背侧或关节内螺钉误置。对于每个螺钉位置,通过二维和三维透视获取图像,并由三名不知情的观察者进行评估。评估敏感性和特异性、观察者间一致性以及观察者信心。分别测量二维和三维透视的剂量面积乘积(DAP)。:三维透视在检测背侧(97.22%)和关节内(95.83%)螺钉误置方面显示出比二维透视更高的敏感性。在二维透视中,纳入切线位视图后,检测背侧螺钉突出的敏感性从63.89%提高到75.00 - 77.78%。对于关节内穿透,二维透视中加入斜位视图后,敏感性从79.17%提高到83.33%。三维透视下观察者信心更高。与二维透视(14.2±3.7 cGycm)相比,三维透视的DAP显著更高(42.4±0.4 cGycm)(P<0.0001)。:与二维透视相比,三维透视可改善桡骨远端螺钉误置的检测。然而,其常规使用受到辐射暴露增加和可用性有限的限制。如果无法进行三维透视,添加背侧切线位和斜位视图可能会提高二维透视的敏感性。