Sánchez-Suárez Fernando, Palenzuela María Del Valle, Rosal Antonio, Peinado Rafael Andrés
Agricultural Chemistry, Soil Science and Microbiology Department, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, N-IV Road, Km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Molecular Biology and Biochemical Engineering Department, University Pablo de Olavide, Utrera Road, Km 1, 41013 Seville, Spain.
Foods. 2025 Aug 9;14(16):2773. doi: 10.3390/foods14162773.
The most notable effects of climate change on wine production are higher alcohol levels, lower acidity and changes to the regions suitable for growing grapes. One solution to acidity problems is the use of , a yeast that produces lactic acid during fermentation, albeit at the cost of reduced aromatic complexity. A novel approach to addressing this problem is to use to produce wines with a very high acidity, regardless of other parameters, for subsequent blending with a control wine with a naturally low acidity. This achieves a balanced acidity while retaining the organoleptic characteristics of the control wine. This is a novel idea, as is not usually used in the final wine. However, the objective from the beginning is to create a blend that combines the best characteristics of the control wine with the improved acidity provided by . Base wines were produced by inoculating 20, 40, or 60 h after inoculating . Base wines generally show an increase in lactic acid content and a decrease in certain key aromatic compounds, such as isoamyl acetate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, and ethyl octanoate. Concentrations of other compounds such as acetaldehyde and higher alcohols also increase. The base wines were then blended with a low-acidity control wine. The resulting blends exhibited higher acidity than the control wine, as well as better aromatic profiles, particularly regarding fruity and green fruit aromatic compounds, compared to base wines. Ten volatile compounds have been correlated with lactic acid production by , namely ethyl hexanoate; ethyl butanoate; 2-methylbutanol; ethyl heptanoate; isoamyl acetate; acetaldehyde; isobutanol; 2-phenylethanol; dodecanol; and acetoin. The first five are negatively correlated and the rest are positively correlated. Lastly, sensory analysis revealed that the blends achieved the best balance between acidity and aroma, making them the most popular with tasters.
气候变化对葡萄酒生产最显著的影响是酒精含量升高、酸度降低以及适合种植葡萄的区域发生变化。解决酸度问题的一种方法是使用[某种酵母名称],这种酵母在发酵过程中会产生乳酸,不过代价是降低了香气复杂度。一种解决这个问题的新方法是使用[另一种酵母名称]来生产酸度非常高的葡萄酒,无论其他参数如何,随后与酸度自然较低的对照葡萄酒进行混合。这样在保持对照葡萄酒感官特性的同时实现了酸度平衡。这是一个新颖的想法,因为[某种酵母名称]通常不会用于最终的葡萄酒中。然而,从一开始的目标就是创造一种将对照葡萄酒的最佳特性与[另一种酵母名称]提供的改善后的酸度相结合的混合酒。基础葡萄酒是在接种[某种酵母名称]20、40或60小时后接种[另一种酵母名称]生产的。基础葡萄酒通常会出现乳酸含量增加以及某些关键芳香化合物减少的情况,比如乙酸异戊酯、乙酸苯乙酯、己酸乙酯和辛酸乙酯。乙醛和高级醇等其他化合物的浓度也会增加。然后将基础葡萄酒与低酸度的对照葡萄酒进行混合。与基础葡萄酒相比,最终的混合酒酸度高于对照葡萄酒,并且具有更好的香气特征,特别是在果香和青果芳香化合物方面。已经发现有十种挥发性化合物与[某种酵母名称]产生乳酸有关,即己酸乙酯;丁酸乙酯;2-甲基丁醇;庚酸乙酯;乙酸异戊酯;乙醛;异丁醇;2-苯乙醇;十二醇;以及乙偶姻。前五种呈负相关,其余呈正相关。最后,感官分析表明,混合酒在酸度和香气之间达到了最佳平衡,使其最受品酒师欢迎。