Suppr超能文献

[三种病理分类(拉帕波特分类法、LSG分类法和工作分类法)用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗的比较]

[Comparison of three pathologic classifications (Rappaport, LSG and Working Formulation) for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].

作者信息

Shibuya H, Kamiyama R, Umehara I, Okada Y, Sato S, Yoshimatsu S, Horiuchi J, Suzuki S

出版信息

Gan No Rinsho. 1985 Nov;31(14):1757-61.

PMID:4087381
Abstract

Comparison of three pathologic classifications (Rappaport, LSG and Working Formulation) was made for 292 cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were treated at the Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, from 1952 to 1984. The Working Formulation was found to be the most convenient classification for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Japan. There were two remarkable characteristics in the cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classified by the Working Formulation. They were better case distribution having a strong relation to clinical prognosis and fewer high-grade cases in Waldeyer's ring lymphoma.

摘要

对1952年至1984年在东京医科齿科大学放射科接受治疗的292例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者进行了三种病理分类(Rappaport分类、LSG分类和工作分类法)的比较。结果发现,工作分类法是日本治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤最方便的分类方法。采用工作分类法分类的非霍奇金淋巴瘤病例有两个显著特征。它们的病例分布更好,与临床预后有很强的相关性,并且Waldeyer环淋巴瘤中的高级别病例较少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验