Golçalves Ocílio Ribeiro, Ohannesian Victor Arthur, Maximiano Mariana Letícia de Bastos, Maia Henrique, Vilardo Marina, Paleare Luis Fravio Fabrini, Fukunaga Christian Ken, Oliveira João Victor Araujo de, Cronemberger Társis Vinícius, Ferreira Márcio Yuri, Almeida Kelson James, Telles João Paulo Mota
Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neuroradiology. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03747-2.
Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for large vessel occlusions (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), traditionally performed using transfemoral access (TFA). However, the sheathless transradial approach (sTRA) has emerged as a viable alternative, particularly for patients with complex vascular anatomies.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of sTRA in MT for AIS.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, including observational studies that reported on MT using sTRA. Primary outcomes included the proportion of successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] grade 2b-3), crossover rates from radial to femoral access, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Secondary outcomes assessed were minor access site-related complications.
A total of four studies were included, comprising 138 patients who underwent MT with sTRA. The pooled analysis revealed a high rate of successful reperfusion (97%; 95% CI: 95-100%), with a low crossover rate to TFA (3%; 95% CI: 0-7%). The incidence of sICH was low, at 4% (95% CI: 0-8%), and minor access site-related complications occurred in 5% of patients (95% CI: 2-9%).
This meta-analysis demonstrates that sTRA is a feasible and effective approach for MT in AIS, with a favorable safety profile. The technique offers high recanalization rates, low complication rates, and minimal need for crossover to TFA. Future randomized controlled trials comparing MT with sTRA and TFA are needed to confirm these results and refine patient selection criteria for this approach. Despite encouraging results, the small number of included studies and their observational design limit the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, further comparative and randomized trials are needed to validate these outcomes.
机械取栓术(MT)是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)中大血管闭塞(LVO)的标准治疗方法,传统上采用经股动脉入路(TFA)。然而,无鞘经桡动脉入路(sTRA)已成为一种可行的替代方法,特别是对于血管解剖结构复杂的患者。
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估sTRA在AIS的MT中的可行性、有效性和安全性。
我们按照PRISMA指南进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,纳入了报道使用sTRA进行MT的观察性研究。主要结局包括成功再灌注的比例(改良脑梗死治疗[mTICI]2b-3级)、从桡动脉入路转换为股动脉入路的比例以及有症状的颅内出血(sICH)。评估的次要结局是与穿刺部位相关的轻微并发症。
共纳入四项研究,包括138例行sTRA取栓术的患者。汇总分析显示成功再灌注率较高(97%;95%CI:95-100%),转换为TFA的比例较低(3%;95%CI:0-7%)。sICH的发生率较低,为4%(95%CI:0-8%),5%的患者出现了与穿刺部位相关的轻微并发症(95%CI:2-9%)。
这项荟萃分析表明,sTRA是AIS的MT中一种可行且有效的方法,具有良好的安全性。该技术再通率高、并发症发生率低,转换为TFA的需求最小。未来需要进行比较MT与sTRA和TFA的随机对照试验,以证实这些结果并完善该方法的患者选择标准。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但纳入研究数量较少及其观察性设计限制了研究结果的普遍性。因此,需要进一步的比较和随机试验来验证这些结果。