Cozzolino Immacolata, Ehinger Mats, Calaminici Maria, Ronchi Andrea, Al-Abbadi Mousa A, Barroca Helena, Bode-Lesniewska Beata, Chhieng David F, Katz Ruth L, Lin Oscar, Medeiros L Jeffrey, Pitman Martha Bishop, Rajwanshi Arvind, Schmitt Fernando C, Vielh Philippe, Zeppa Pio, Cree Ian A, Sewell William A, Rekhi Bharat, Field Andrew S
Acta Cytol. 2025 Aug 27:1-24. doi: 10.1159/000548199.
Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of lymph nodes is a widely used method for evaluating lymphadenopathy. FNAB offers general advantages of rapid turnaround time, low cost and minimal morbidity, and more specific advantages in various clinical situations, such as deeply located lymph nodes or patients with significant comorbidities. The FNAB sample can be utilized for a wide range of ancillary tests, including microbiological studies, immunocytochemistry for primary and metastatic neoplasms and flow cytometry immunophenotyping in cases of lymphoid-rich samples, where there is a suspicion for lymphomas. The increasing application of FNAB in lymph node pathology has led to the development of a standardized reporting system, formalized in the World Health Organization (WHO) Reporting System for Lymph Node, Spleen and Thymus Cytopathology (WHO System). This system is equally applicable to lymph node, spleen and thymus; however, this article focuses on lymph nodes. The WHO System was established through a joint project of the WHO, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) and is structured into five diagnostic categories: Inadequate/Insufficient/Non-diagnostic, Benign, Atypical, Suspicious for Malignancy and Malignant. The WHO System provides a standardized and reliable means of categorizing various lymph node lesions based on cytopathology findings and enables pathologists to make more accurate and reproducible diagnoses, thereby improving clinical management and treatment decisions. Integrating cellular morphology and clinical-imaging data helps distinguish benign from malignant lesions, significantly reducing diagnostic variability. The primary goal is to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and improve patient outcomes through greater consistency and clarity in lymph node cytopathology reports. The WHO System emphasizes the use of rapid on-site assessment (ROSE) to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce the need for additional diagnostic procedures. The risk of malignancy (ROM) varies by diagnostic category, with higher risks of malignancy in the "Suspicious for malignancy" and "Malignant" categories. The system also includes recommendations for ancillary tests and performance of additional biopsies when further clarification is needed. In conclusion, the WHO System represents a significant advancement in the standardization of lymph node, spleen and thymus cytopathology, facilitating interdisciplinary communication and improving risk stratification. However, diagnostic challenges remain, particularly in managing inadequate samples and interpreting atypical lesions, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach that integrates clinical, imaging, ancillary testing and, in some cases, core needle or excision biopsy material. The WHO System serves as a crucial tool for refining the diagnosis of the broad range of inflammatory, infectious, metastatic and lymphomatous processes in lymph node pathologies. In addition, it is suitable for high income as well as most obviously low- and middle-income countries leading to optimizing therapeutic decision-making.
淋巴结细针穿刺活检(FNAB)是评估淋巴结病广泛使用的方法。FNAB具有周转时间快、成本低和发病率低的一般优势,在各种临床情况下还有更具体的优势,如深部淋巴结或有严重合并症的患者。FNAB样本可用于广泛的辅助检查,包括微生物学研究、原发性和转移性肿瘤的免疫细胞化学以及富含淋巴细胞样本(怀疑有淋巴瘤)的流式细胞术免疫表型分析。FNAB在淋巴结病理学中的应用不断增加,促使了标准化报告系统的发展,该系统在世界卫生组织(WHO)淋巴结、脾脏和胸腺细胞病理学报告系统(WHO系统)中得以正式确立。该系统同样适用于淋巴结、脾脏和胸腺;然而,本文重点关注淋巴结。WHO系统是通过WHO、国际癌症研究机构(IARC)和国际细胞学会(IAC)的联合项目建立的,分为五个诊断类别:不充分/不足/无法诊断、良性、非典型、怀疑恶性和恶性。WHO系统提供了一种基于细胞病理学结果对各种淋巴结病变进行分类的标准化且可靠的方法,使病理学家能够做出更准确、可重复的诊断,从而改善临床管理和治疗决策。整合细胞形态学和临床影像学数据有助于区分良性和恶性病变,显著减少诊断变异性。主要目标是通过提高淋巴结细胞病理学报告的一致性和清晰度来减少诊断不确定性并改善患者预后。WHO系统强调使用快速现场评估(ROSE)来提高诊断准确性并减少额外诊断程序的需求。恶性风险(ROM)因诊断类别而异,在“怀疑恶性”和“恶性”类别中恶性风险更高。该系统还包括在需要进一步澄清时辅助检查和进行额外活检的建议。总之,WHO系统代表了淋巴结、脾脏和胸腺细胞病理学标准化方面的重大进展,促进了跨学科交流并改善了风险分层。然而,诊断挑战依然存在,尤其是在处理不充分样本和解释非典型病变方面,这需要一种综合临床、影像学、辅助检查以及在某些情况下核心针吸或切除活检材料的多学科方法。WHO系统是完善淋巴结病理学中广泛的炎症、感染、转移和淋巴瘤性病变诊断的关键工具。此外,它适用于高收入国家以及最明显的低收入和中等收入国家,有助于优化治疗决策。