Fassio A, Sebastiani M, Pollastri F, Cozzini F, Crotti C, Ughi N, De Lorenzis E, Mancuso S, Radin M, Carrara G, Landolfi G, Rozza D, Manfredi A
Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; Rheumatology Unit, AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy.
Autoimmun Rev. 2025 Dec 18;24(12):103922. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103922. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is a severe extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite recent guideline initiatives, no treatment recommendations specifically tailored to RA-ILD have been developed in Italy. This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis was conducted to inform the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) national recommendations for the management of RA-ILD.
we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating pharmacological interventions for RA-ILD from inception up to October 2023, followed by an update up to April 2025, with a pre-defined protocol. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series reporting pulmonary function outcomes, radiological progression, adverse events, and mortality. Meta-analyses were performed, and heterogeneity and publication bias were thoroughly assessed.
sixty-nine studies encompassing 7879 RA-ILD patients were included. Treatments with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), abatacept (ABA), and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) were associated with stabilization or improvement of forced vital capacity (FVC). Methotrexate (MTX) was associated with reduced risk of ILD progression and mortality. Antifibrotics, particularly nintedanib, demonstrated variable efficacy, while pirfenidone showed limited benefit. Safety profiles favored antifibrotics over csDMARDs/immunosuppressants regarding serious adverse events.
this SLR provides an updated synthesis of evidence on RA-ILD treatments, supporting the forthcoming SIR recommendations. Despite inherent limitations of observational studies and heterogeneity, the data highlight the safety of MTX and particularly support ABA, RTX, and nintedanib as promising options, while underscoring the need for further high-quality trials specifically in RA-ILD.
类风湿关节炎相关间质性肺疾病(RA-ILD)是类风湿关节炎(RA)一种严重的关节外表现。尽管最近有指南出台,但意大利尚未制定专门针对RA-ILD的治疗建议。开展这项系统文献综述(SLR)和荟萃分析,旨在为意大利风湿病学会(SIR)制定RA-ILD管理的国家建议提供参考。
我们按照预先定义的方案,对从研究起始至2023年10月评估RA-ILD药物干预措施的研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,随后更新至2025年4月。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、队列研究以及报告肺功能结果、影像学进展、不良事件和死亡率的病例系列。进行了荟萃分析,并全面评估了异质性和发表偏倚。
纳入了69项研究,涉及7879例RA-ILD患者。使用传统合成抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)、利妥昔单抗(RTX)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)、阿巴西普(ABA)和Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)进行治疗与用力肺活量(FVC)的稳定或改善相关。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)与ILD进展和死亡率风险降低相关。抗纤维化药物,尤其是尼达尼布,疗效不一,而吡非尼酮的益处有限。在严重不良事件方面,抗纤维化药物的安全性优于csDMARDs/免疫抑制剂。
本SLR提供了关于RA-ILD治疗证据的最新综合信息,支持即将出台的SIR建议。尽管观察性研究存在固有局限性和异质性,但数据突出了MTX的安全性,特别支持将ABA、RTX和尼达尼布作为有前景的选择,同时强调需要专门针对RA-ILD开展进一步高质量试验。