Doldi Philipp M, Steffen Julius, Gehlich Antonia, Tischmacher Maximilian, Fröhlich Carolin, Stark Konstantin, Haum Magda, Fischer Julius, Stolz Lukas, Loew Kornelia, Theiss Hans, Rizas Konstantinos, Peterß Sven, Hausleiter Jörg, Massberg Steffen, Deseive Simon
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Munich Heart Alliance, German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf254.
Management of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in aortic stenosis (AS) flow-groups-high-gradient (HG-AS), classical low-flow low-gradient (cLFLG-AS), and paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (pLFLG-AS)-is debated. Concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) worsens outcomes, but the influence of MR etiology on AS subtypes is unclear.
To evaluate the impact of MR etiology and severity on outcomes across AS flow groups in TAVR patients.
: A retrospective analysis was performed on 2,658 patients undergoing TAVR (2013-2021). MR was categorized as atrial functional (aFMR), ventricular functional (vFMR), or primary MR (PMR). Outcomes included 3-year mortality, MR improvement, and symptomatic benefit.
: Out of 2,658 TAVR patients, 531 (20.0%) showed at least moderate MR (MR ≥ 2+) (50.1% male, median age 83.1 years). The fraction of patients with MR ≥ 2+ was highest among cLFLG-AS patients (34.2%). MR etiology varied among AS subtypes, with mostly vFMR in cLFLG-AS (83.0%) and highest rates of aFMR (43%) and PMR (45%) in pLFLG-AS patients.Three-year mortality was significantly affected by MR severity (HR for MR2+ vs. MR < 2 1.62 [1.38-1.90]). Differences in 3-year mortality were found in high-gradient (HG)-AS (HR:1.52 [1.16-1.98]) and pLFLG-AS patients (HR:1.73 [1.24-2.40]), but not in cLFLG-AS patients (HR:1.21 [0.93-1.56]). MR improvement after TAVR was commonly found in HG-AS (67.2%) and least often among pLFLG-AS (48.7%, p = 0.03 compared to HG-AS). While MR improvement was associated with a lower mortality in HG-AS (HR:0.21 [0.10-0.43]) and cLFLG-AS patients (HR:0.48 [0.29-0.79]), this was not the case in pLFLG-AS patients (1.32 [0.67-2.59]).
MR etiology and severity influence outcomes after TAVR depending on AS flow groups.