Kurth Jordan D, Sciamanna Christopher N, Danilovich Margaret K, Conroy David E, Schmitz Kathryn H, Silvis Matthew, Rovniak Liza S, Creath Robert, Karakoleva Ema V
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0329684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329684. eCollection 2025.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Resistance training (RT) improves strength and physical function; however, only 35% of older adults meet national guidelines for muscle strengthening activities. Though time is often noted as a barrier to physical activity participation, little is known about the interest of older adults in brief RT programs. This study compared preferences for brief, more frequent vs longer, less frequent RT programs.
A nationwide survey was conducted among 611 US adults aged 65 and over. Preference for either (1) a traditional (45 minutes per session, three days per week) RT program or (2) a short (5 minutes per session, daily) RT program was compared.
Overall, 2.2 times as many older adults preferred the daily 5-minute RT program versus the traditional RT program (68.4% v. 31.6%). Preference for the brief, daily RT program was 5.3 times higher among adults with difficulty walking (84.2% v. 15.8%) than for the traditional RT program.
Preference for a daily 5-minute RT program is significantly higher than for traditional 45-minute, three times weekly programs. This difference is larger in older adults who have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
SIGNIFICANCE/IMPLICATIONS: Brief daily RT options may help engage older adults in RT at a population level, particularly those with poorer health and mobility disability. Future investigations should evaluate differences in uptake, adherence, and outcomes from two RT programs of varying durations and frequencies.
背景/目的:抗阻训练(RT)可增强力量和身体机能;然而,只有35%的老年人达到了肌肉强化活动的国家指南要求。尽管时间常被视为参与体育活动的障碍,但对于老年人对简短抗阻训练计划的兴趣却知之甚少。本研究比较了老年人对简短、更频繁的抗阻训练计划与较长、较不频繁的抗阻训练计划的偏好。
对611名65岁及以上的美国成年人进行了一项全国性调查。比较了他们对以下两种抗阻训练计划的偏好:(1)传统的抗阻训练计划(每次训练45分钟,每周三天)或(2)简短的抗阻训练计划(每次训练5分钟,每天进行)。
总体而言,选择每日5分钟抗阻训练计划的老年人是选择传统抗阻训练计划的2.2倍(68.4%对31.6%)。在行走困难的成年人中,对简短的每日抗阻训练计划的偏好比对传统抗阻训练计划的偏好高5.3倍(84.2%对15.8%)。
对每日5分钟抗阻训练计划的偏好显著高于传统的每周三次、每次45分钟的训练计划。在行走或爬楼梯有严重困难的老年人中,这种差异更大。
意义/启示:简短的每日抗阻训练选择可能有助于在人群层面让老年人参与抗阻训练,特别是那些健康状况较差和有行动障碍的老年人。未来的研究应评估两种不同时长和频率的抗阻训练计划在接受度、依从性和效果方面的差异。