Sakaie Ken, Du Mengke, Obuchowski Nancy, Lowe Mark J, Lin Jian, Fox Robert J
Diagnostics Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2025 Aug 26;11(3):20552173251361225. doi: 10.1177/20552173251361225. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
SPRINT-MS was a placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ibudilast in secondary and primary progressive multiple sclerosis. The trial included multimodal imaging to assess brain tissue integrity. This contribution focuses on improved analysis methods of diffusion tensor imaging to refine its application in clinical trials.
Reassess diffusion tensor imaging from the SPRINT-MS trial.
Postprocessing incorporated corrections for bulk motion, eddy current distortion, outlier replacement, and intra-volume movement. The ICBM-DTI-81 white matter parcellation map was coregistered into native space. Six unilateral and 21 bilateral regions of interest were identified. Median radial diffusivity was the primary outcome measure for this analysis. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the interaction between time and treatment for the outcome measure with Holm correction for multiple comparisons.
Radial diffusivity in the cingulum and cerebellar peduncles showed a significant difference in rate of change between treatment and placebo groups (2.7-7.4 × 10 mm/s per 24-week time period, < 0.04). Radial diffusivity was unchanged (declined) in the treatment (placebo) groups, consistent with preservation (deterioration) of tissue integrity.
Our results suggest that the diffusion tensor imaging of the cingulum and cerebellar peduncles may be useful target outcome metrics in neuroprotective trials in progressive multiple sclerosis.
SPRINT-MS是一项关于异丁司特治疗继发进展型和原发进展型多发性硬化症的安慰剂对照2期试验。该试验包括多模态成像以评估脑组织完整性。本文着重介绍弥散张量成像的改进分析方法,以优化其在临床试验中的应用。
重新评估SPRINT-MS试验中的弥散张量成像。
后处理包括对整体运动、涡流畸变、异常值替换和容积内运动的校正。将ICBM-DTI-81白质分割图谱配准到原始空间。确定了6个单侧和21个双侧感兴趣区域。径向扩散率中位数是该分析的主要结局指标。使用线性混合效应模型评估结局指标在时间和治疗之间的相互作用,并采用霍尔姆校正进行多重比较。
扣带回和小脑脚的径向扩散率在治疗组和安慰剂组之间显示出显著的变化率差异(每24周时间段为2.7 - 7.4×10⁻⁶mm²/s,P < 0.04)。治疗(安慰剂)组的径向扩散率保持不变(下降),这与组织完整性的保存(恶化)一致。
我们的结果表明,扣带回和小脑脚的弥散张量成像可能是进行性多发性硬化症神经保护试验中有用的目标结局指标。