淋巴瘤患者的诊断和治疗路径:通过名义群体技术和德尔菲法达成的专家共识
Diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for lymphoma patients: expert consensus through Nominal Group Technique and Delphi methodology.
作者信息
Guarini Attilio, Bozzoli Valentina, Ciavarella Sabino, Cimminiello Michele, Donatelli Francesca, Fama Angelo, Fesce Vincenza Fernanda, Fraticelli Vincenzo, Gaudio Francesco, Greco Giuseppina, Augusto Martellini, Merchionne Francesca, Miccolis Rosanna Maria, Minoia Carla, Pennese Elsa, Perrone Tommasina, Scalzulli Potito Rosario, Scattone Anna, Skrypets Tetiana, Specchia Mariarosaria, Tonialini Lorenzo, Valvano Mariarosaria, Pavone Vincenzo
机构信息
Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
UO Ematologia e Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, asl Lecce, Lecce, Italy.
出版信息
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 13;15:1627175. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1627175. eCollection 2025.
INTRODUCTION
Lymphomas encompass a heterogeneous group of B- and T-cell malignancies necessitating a complex and precise management. With the aim to define standardized diagnostic and therapeutic pathways across multiple hematology centers in Italy, the "Right Path 4 Lymphomas" project was designed as a multidisciplinary expert platform designed to establish consensus-driven diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
METHODS
Using a two-phase methodology - the Nominal Group Technique followed by a Delphi process - experts systematically evaluated and prioritized key diagnostic and therapeutic topics for five major lymphoma subtypes: classical Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas.
RESULTS
The Delphi process achieved a high level of consensus on 264 of 270 statements (97.8%), reinforcing the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in shaping evidence-based recommendations. Key areas of agreement included histopathologic and molecular diagnostic standards, risk-adapted treatment approaches integrating novel immunotherapies, and structured follow-up strategies. However, areas of debate remained over the clinical utility of minimal residual disease monitoring, optimal sequencing of immunotherapies, and the potential of CAR-T therapy versus bispecific antibodies.
DISCUSSION
This project highlights the need for a structured, consensus-driven approach to lymphoma care that aligns with evolving international guidelines while addressing the distinct regulatory and healthcare landscape in Italy. The findings provide a valuable framework for clinicians and policymakers to optimize lymphoma management, balancing innovation with the allocation of resources and clinical feasibility.
引言
淋巴瘤包括一组异质性的B细胞和T细胞恶性肿瘤,需要复杂而精确的管理。为了在意大利多个血液学中心确定标准化的诊断和治疗途径,“淋巴瘤正确路径”项目被设计为一个多学科专家平台,旨在建立基于共识的诊断和治疗途径。
方法
采用两阶段方法——名义群体技术 followed by a Delphi process——专家们系统地评估了五种主要淋巴瘤亚型(经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤、弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤、滤泡性淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤和外周T细胞淋巴瘤)的关键诊断和治疗主题,并对其进行了优先排序。
结果
Delphi过程对270条陈述中的264条(97.8%)达成了高度共识,强化了多学科合作在制定循证建议中的重要性。达成共识的关键领域包括组织病理学和分子诊断标准、整合新型免疫疗法的风险适应性治疗方法以及结构化的随访策略。然而,关于微小残留病监测的临床实用性、免疫疗法的最佳顺序以及CAR-T疗法与双特异性抗体的潜力等方面仍存在争议。
讨论
该项目强调了需要一种结构化的、基于共识的淋巴瘤护理方法,该方法既要符合不断发展的国际指南,又要应对意大利独特的监管和医疗环境。研究结果为临床医生和政策制定者优化淋巴瘤管理提供了一个有价值的框架,在创新与资源分配和临床可行性之间取得平衡。