Suppr超能文献

癌症患者抑郁症状的治疗:一项系统综述和网状Meta分析。

Treatments of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fu Wenhai, Liu Yuexin, Jiang Yu, Chu Hongjiang, Shao Robin, Chen Peiling, Zheng Xin, Li Caichen, He Jianxing, Lin Kangguang, Liang Wenhua

机构信息

Hengqin Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Hengqin, China.

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 29;15(1):327. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03507-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is are often insufficiently managed in cancer patients globally. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in alleviating depressive symptoms in adult cancer patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until 31 July 2024, with an updated search conducted on 10 January 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials evaluating pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for depressive symptoms in adult patients with cancer (aged ≥18 years). Studies involving paediatric populations, lacking complete outcome data, or not reporting intervention outcomes were excluded. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of included interventions. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023465056).

FINDINGS

A total of 95 RCTs involving 17,260 participants were included. Several non-pharmacological interventions indicated potential benefit compared with usual care, notably massage and touch therapy (standardised mean difference [SMD]: -0.76, 95% CI: -1.37 to -0.16; low certainty), relaxation therapy (SMD: -0.59, 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.11; low certainty), psychotherapy (SMD: -0.43, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.30; low certainty), and education and support of person with cancer (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.14; low certainty). Among pharmacological approaches, preliminary findings suggest the combination of mirtazapine and methylphenidate may offer benefits compared with placebo (SMD: -2.46, 95% CI: -4.24 to -0.70; low certainty). However, the overall evidence quality was low, reflecting substantial variability and limited data.

INTERPRETATION

Non-pharmacological interventions such as massage, relaxation therapies, and psychotherapy show promise in alleviating depressive symptoms in cancer patients. Limited preliminary evidence also suggests possible benefits of combined pharmacological treatment (mirtazapine plus methylphenidate). More rigorous research is required to strengthen these findings and better inform clinical practice.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,癌症患者的抑郁症往往未得到充分治疗。为解决这一问题,我们进行了一项全面的系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以评估和比较药物干预和非药物干预在缓解成年癌症患者抑郁症状方面的有效性。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间从建库至2024年7月31日,并于2025年1月10日进行了更新检索。符合条件的研究为随机对照试验,评估成年癌症患者(年龄≥18岁)抑郁症状的药物或非药物干预措施。排除涉及儿科人群、缺乏完整结局数据或未报告干预结局的研究。采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较纳入干预措施的有效性。该综述方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42023465056)中进行前瞻性注册。

结果

共纳入95项随机对照试验,涉及17260名参与者。与常规护理相比,几种非药物干预措施显示出潜在益处,尤其是按摩和触摸疗法(标准化均数差[SMD]:-0.76,95%置信区间:-1.37至-0.16;低确定性)、放松疗法(SMD:-0.59,95%置信区间:-1.06至-0.11;低确定性)、心理治疗(SMD:-0.43,95%置信区间:-0.56至-0.30;低确定性)以及癌症患者的教育和支持(SMD:-0.30,95%置信区间:-0.45至-0.14;低确定性)。在药物治疗方法中,初步结果表明,与安慰剂相比,米氮平与哌甲酯联合使用可能有益(SMD:-2.46,95%置信区间:-4.24至-0.70;低确定性)。然而,总体证据质量较低,反映出存在较大变异性且数据有限。

解读

按摩、放松疗法和心理治疗等非药物干预措施在缓解癌症患者抑郁症状方面显示出前景。有限的初步证据还表明联合药物治疗(米氮平加哌甲酯)可能有益。需要更严格的研究来强化这些发现,并为临床实践提供更好的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验