Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎中口服甲氨蝶呤分剂给药与单剂给药的比较:一项随机对照试验(SMART研究)

Split vs single-dose oral methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial (SMART study).

作者信息

Prasad Chandra Bhushan, Dhir Varun, Gupta Ranjan, Thomas Koshy Nithin, Devarasetti Phani Kumar, Pai Venkatesh Srinivasa, Jain Avinash, Naidu Gsrsnk, Saini Priya, Leishangthem Bidyalaxmi, Khullar Aastha, Manthri Ramesh, Sharma Shefali Khanna, Sharma Aman, Aggarwal Amita, Jain Sanjay

机构信息

Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Department of Rheumatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07646-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacokinetic evidence suggests split dose of oral methotrexate increases bioavailability, but unproven to improve efficacy. Thus, we planned to compare clinical response of split vs single-dose oral methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This pragmatic, open-label (blinded assessor) randomized controlled trial was conducted across six university hospitals in India and enrolled patients with seropositive RA with active disease (TJC ≥ 4 and SJC ≥ 2). They were randomized 1:1 to split-dose (15 mg morning, 10 mg evening) or single-dose (25 mg) once weekly oral methotrexate for 16 weeks, after which a second DMARD could be added. Primary outcome and key secondary outcomes were EULAR good response at 24 weeks and 16 weeks respectively. Analysis was by intention-to-treat with non-response imputation. Clinical Trials Registry-India CTRI/2021/02/031361.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three patients [83% female, mean age 42.2 years, mean disease duration 2.1 yrs] were randomized to receive either split-dose (n = 128) or single-dose (n = 125) methotrexate. Primary outcome, good response at 24 weeks, was not significantly higher with split-dose methotrexate (+ 6.5%, 95% CI - 4.2 to 17.2%, p = 0.263). However, key secondary outcome, good response at 16 weeks, was significantly higher with split-dose methotrexate (+ 12.3%, 95% CI 3.5 to 21.3%, p = 0.008). Also, less patients in split-dose group required addition of second DMARD at 16 weeks (- 19.5%, p = 0.003). Numerically higher transaminitis and intolerance occurred with split-dose MTX.

CONCLUSION

Although the primary outcome was not met, we found faster response and better efficacy at 16 weeks with split-dose oral MTX, and reduced need for a second DMARD. Key Points • This was the first RCT to compare split-dose (same-day, morning, evening) to single-dose oral methotrexate (MTX) and included 253 patients of RA. • Primary outcome was not met, i.e., split-dose MTX was not superior in terms of EULAR good response at 24 weeks. • However, key secondary outcome was met, i.e., split-dose MTX met led to significantly higher EULAR good response at 16 weeks; also it reduced need for addition of a second DMARD. • Split-dose MTX was associated with higher adverse effects (numerically) in terms of both intolerance and transaminitis.

摘要

目的

药代动力学证据表明,口服甲氨蝶呤分剂量服用可提高生物利用度,但尚未证实能提高疗效。因此,我们计划比较类风湿关节炎(RA)患者口服甲氨蝶呤分剂量与单剂量给药的临床反应。

方法

这项务实的、开放标签(评估者设盲)随机对照试验在印度的六所大学医院开展,纳入血清学阳性、患有活动性疾病(TJC≥4且SJC≥2)的RA患者。他们被随机分为1:1两组,分别接受每周一次的分剂量(早上15mg,晚上10mg)或单剂量(25mg)口服甲氨蝶呤治疗,为期16周,之后可加用第二种改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)。主要结局和关键次要结局分别为24周和16周时达到欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)良好反应。采用意向性分析并对无反应进行插补。印度临床试验注册中心CTRI/2021/02/031361。

结果

253例患者[83%为女性,平均年龄42.2岁,平均病程2.1年]被随机分配接受分剂量(n = 128)或单剂量(n = 125)甲氨蝶呤治疗。主要结局,即24周时的良好反应,分剂量甲氨蝶呤组并无显著更高(+6.5%,95%CI -4.2至17.2%,p = 0.263)。然而,关键次要结局,即16周时的良好反应,分剂量甲氨蝶呤组显著更高(+12.3%,95%CI 3.5至21.3%,p = 0.008)。此外,分剂量组在16周时需要加用第二种DMARD的患者较少(-19.5%,p = 0.003)。分剂量甲氨蝶呤在数值上有更高的转氨酶升高和不耐受情况发生。

结论

虽然未达到主要结局,但我们发现分剂量口服甲氨蝶呤在16周时反应更快、疗效更好,且减少了加用第二种DMARD的需求。要点 • 这是第一项比较分剂量(同一天早上、晚上)与单剂量口服甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的随机对照试验,纳入了253例RA患者。 • 未达到主要结局,即分剂量MTX在24周时EULAR良好反应方面并不优于单剂量。 • 然而,达到了关键次要结局,即分剂量MTX在16周时导致EULAR良好反应显著更高;同时也减少了加用第二种DMARD的需求。 • 分剂量MTX在不耐受和转氨酶升高方面在数值上有更高的不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验