Steinbacher Jana, Kulaksız Taibe, Kalz Marco
Institut für Bildungsanalysen Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany.
Heidelberg University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02703-1.
Considering the increasing relevance of digital education in cancer training, this study explores the current use of educational technologies in oncology across Europe.
A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling to gather responses from learners and educators across Europe. Data was collected online via Lime Survey.
Results indicate that both groups are most familiar with synchronous and blended learning, with less experience in asynchronous and hybrid formats. Live lectures were the most used tool, while virtual reality and simulations were less used. Regional differences reveal that Northern Europe prefers audio-based tools and e-books, while Central Europe demonstrates higher familiarity with asynchronous learning and interactive tools. Southern Europe has less experience with various modalities and tools. Professionally, cancer nurses reported more experience with asynchronous learning and learning management systems, while clinical oncologists demonstrated limited familiarity with various tools, particularly emerging technologies.
For multi-disciplinary oncology training to succeed, practitioners need to align learning objectives with participants' prior experiences and balance diverse target groups and implementation needs to address regional and professional disparities. Targeted efforts are needed to bridge gaps in digital infrastructure, accessibility, and institutional support. Explanatory studies are needed to confirm these findings.
鉴于数字教育在癌症培训中的相关性日益增加,本研究探讨了欧洲各地肿瘤学教育技术的当前使用情况。
采用便利抽样进行横断面研究,以收集欧洲各地学习者和教育工作者的反馈。数据通过 Lime Survey 在线收集。
结果表明,两组对同步学习和混合学习最为熟悉,对异步和混合形式的经验较少。现场讲座是使用最多的工具,而虚拟现实和模拟则使用较少。地区差异表明,北欧更喜欢基于音频的工具和电子书,而中欧对异步学习和交互式工具更为熟悉。南欧对各种模式和工具的经验较少。在专业方面,癌症护士报告在异步学习和学习管理系统方面有更多经验,而临床肿瘤学家对各种工具,特别是新兴技术的熟悉程度有限。
为使多学科肿瘤学培训取得成功,从业者需要使学习目标与参与者的先前经验保持一致,并平衡不同的目标群体,同时在实施中需要解决地区和专业差异。需要有针对性地努力弥合数字基础设施、可及性和机构支持方面的差距。需要进行解释性研究来证实这些发现。