Lassen Mats C Højbjerg, Johansen Niklas Dyrby, Christensen Sine H, Aliabadi Negar, Skaarup Kristoffer G, Modin Daniel, Claggett Brian L, Larsen Carsten S, Larsen Lykke, Wiese Lothar, Dalager-Pedersen Michael, Lindholm Matias G, Jensen Anne Marie R, Dons Maria, Bernholm Katrine F, Davidovski Filip S, Duus Lisa S, Ottosen Camilla I, Nielsen Anne B, Borchsenius Julie H, Espersen Caroline, Köse Güldas, Fussing Frederik H, Pareek Manan, Køber Lars, Solomon Scott D, Jensen Jens Ulrik Stæhr, Martel Cyril Jean-Marie, Gessner Bradford D, Schwarz Claudia, Gonzalez Elisa, Skovdal Mette, Moulton Lawrence H, Zhang Pingping, Begier Elizabeth, Biering-Sørensen Tor
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Translational Cardiology and Pragmatic Randomized Trials, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
JAMA. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.15405.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is linked to elevated cardiovascular risk, particularly in individuals with preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD). A bivalent RSV prefusion F protein (RSVpreF) vaccine was recently approved for preventing RSV-related lower respiratory tract illness, but its effectiveness against cardiovascular outcomes has not been evaluated in a randomized trial.
To investigate the vaccine effectiveness of RSVpreF compared with no vaccine against cardiovascular outcomes among adults aged 60 years or older.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified secondary analysis of the DAN-RSV trial, a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized clinical trial conducted in Denmark during the 2024-2025 winter season. The first participant was enrolled on November 18, 2024. Adults aged 60 years or older were eligible for inclusion regardless of comorbidity status.
Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive RSVpreF (n = 65 642) or no vaccine (n = 65 634).
Hospitalization for any cardiorespiratory disease was a prespecified secondary outcome, and hospitalizations for any CVD, heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and atrial fibrillation were prespecified exploratory outcomes. Outcomes were assessed from 14 days after booked study visit through May 31, 2025. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 1 - incidence rate ratio, expressed as a percentage.
Of 131 276 participants included (mean age, 69.4 [SD, 6.5] years; 50.3% male), 28 662 (21.8%) had preexisting CVD. All-cause cardiorespiratory hospitalization incidence was lower in the RSVpreF group compared with the control group (26.3 vs 29.2 events per 1000 participant-years [PY]; absolute rate reduction, 2.90 [95% CI, 0.10-5.71] per 1000 PY; vaccine effectiveness, 9.9% [95% CI, 0.3%-18.7%]; P = .04). There was no significant interaction by baseline CVD status (CVD at baseline: vaccine effectiveness, 5.0% [95% CI, -11.2% to 16.7%]; no CVD at baseline: vaccine effectiveness, 15.2% [95% CI, 2.2%-27.1%]; P = .27 for interaction). For the RSVpreF group vs control group, respectively, incidence rates of all-cause cardiovascular hospitalization were 16.4 vs 17.7 events per 1000 PY (vaccine effectiveness, 7.4% [95% CI, -5.5% to 18.8%]; P = .24), and incidence rates of stroke were 3.0 vs 3.8 events per 1000 PY (vaccine effectiveness, 19.4% [95% CI, -8.6% to 40.4%]; P = .14). There were also no statistically significant between-group differences for myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, and atrial fibrillation.
In adults aged 60 years or older, all-cause cardiorespiratory hospitalization was significantly lower with RSVpreF than with no vaccine. The findings suggest potential downstream cardiorespiratory benefits of RSV immunization, although the effect on all-cause cardiovascular hospitalization was not statistically significant.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06684743.
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染与心血管疾病风险升高有关,尤其是在已有心血管疾病(CVD)的个体中。一种二价RSV预融合F蛋白(RSVpreF)疫苗最近被批准用于预防RSV相关的下呼吸道疾病,但尚未在随机试验中评估其对心血管结局的有效性。
调查60岁及以上成年人中,与未接种疫苗相比,RSVpreF疫苗对心血管结局的有效性。
设计、设置和参与者:对DAN-RSV试验进行预先指定的二次分析,这是一项在丹麦2024 - 2025年冬季进行的务实、开放标签、个体随机临床试验。第一名参与者于2024年11月18日入组。60岁及以上的成年人无论合并症状态如何均符合纳入条件。
参与者按1:1随机分组,接受RSVpreF(n = 65642)或不接种疫苗(n = 65634)。
任何心肺疾病住院是预先指定的次要结局,任何CVD、心力衰竭、心肌梗死、中风和心房颤动住院是预先指定的探索性结局。结局从预定研究访视后14天开始评估,至2025年5月31日。疫苗有效性计算为1 - 发病率比,以百分比表示。
在纳入的131276名参与者中(平均年龄69.4[标准差,6.5]岁;50.3%为男性),28662名(21.8%)已有CVD。与对照组相比,RSVpreF组全因心肺住院发病率较低(每1000参与者年[PY]分别为26.3例与29.2例;绝对率降低,每1000 PY为2.90[95%置信区间,0.10 - 5.71];疫苗有效性,9.9%[95%置信区间,0.3% - 18.7%];P = 0.04)。基线CVD状态无显著交互作用(基线有CVD:疫苗有效性,5.0%[95%置信区间,-11.2%至16.7%];基线无CVD:疫苗有效性,15.2%[95%置信区间,2.2% - 27.1%];交互作用P = 0.27)。对于RSVpreF组与对照组,全因心血管住院发病率分别为每1000 PY 16.4例与17.7例(疫苗有效性,7.4%[95%置信区间,-5.5%至18.8%];P = 0.24),中风发病率分别为每1000 PY 3.0例与3.8例(疫苗有效性,19.4%[95%置信区间,-8.6%至40.4%];P = 0.14)。心肌梗死、心力衰竭住院和心房颤动的组间差异也无统计学意义。
在60岁及以上成年人中,RSVpreF组的全因心肺住院率显著低于未接种疫苗组。研究结果表明RSV免疫可能对下游心肺有益,尽管对全因心血管住院的影响无统计学意义。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT066847