医学教育中的艺术教育问卷（AEMEQ）的验证：将医学科学与人文科学相结合。

Validation of the art education in medical education questionnaire (AEMEQ): integrating medical sciences with the humanities.

作者信息

Salmani Fatemeh, Yaghoobi Mohammad Javad, Mohammadi Yahya, Abedi Farshid, Farrokhfall Khadijeh

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Geriatric Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07815-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07815-2

PMID:40885934

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12398017/

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Art education is essential for developing creative abilities and improving sensory perception, as it integrates non-biomedical elements in medicine. Survey methodology gathers much of the medical education data relevant to these non-observable behaviors. The main objective of this study is to validate a questionnaire for an artistic education-based medicine curriculum by collecting opinions from expert faculty and students.

METHODS

The AEMEQ was evaluated by its reliability and validity measurement. Content validity was determined by expert opinion (n = 20). To determine the internal structure of the AEMEQ and construct validity, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis to assess the good fit using responses from 552 medical students who completed the AEMEQ. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest methods.

RESULTS

CVI > 0.72 for relevance, clarity, and simplicity resulted in 23 items for final analysis. 21 items with high reliability (ICC = 0.92) were obtained following construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five components (KMO = 0.93) associated with significant results from the Bartlett test. All components with AVE and CR values >0.7 are considered acceptable. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated significant fit indices such as Chisq/df = 2.25 and comparative fit index, CFI = 0.93. The final version of AEMEQ with 20 items showed acceptable reliability in most dimensions with potent relationships among components.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

This study precisely validates a 20-item AEMEQ for assessing arts education in medicine, exhibiting strong content/construct validity and satisfactory reliability between dimensions. Findings indicated significant positive correlations between different dimensions of the AEMEQ, highlighting the necessity of integrating artistic education into medical education.

摘要

背景

艺术教育对于培养创造力和提高感官知觉至关重要，因为它将非生物医学元素融入医学之中。调查方法收集了许多与这些不可观察行为相关的医学教育数据。本研究的主要目的是通过收集专家教师和学生的意见，验证一份基于艺术教育的医学课程问卷。

方法

通过可靠性和有效性测量对AEMEQ进行评估。内容效度由专家意见确定（n = 20）。为了确定AEMEQ的内部结构和结构效度，进行了探索性因素分析，随后进行验证性因素分析，以使用完成AEMEQ的552名医学生的回答来评估良好拟合度。使用克朗巴哈系数和重测法评估可靠性。

结果

相关性、清晰度和简单性的CVI > 0.72，最终分析得到23个项目。在结构效度之后获得了21个具有高可靠性（ICC = 0.92）的项目。探索性因素分析揭示了五个成分（KMO = 0.93），与巴特利特检验的显著结果相关。所有AVE和CR值> 0.7的成分都被认为是可接受的。验证性因素分析表明了显著的拟合指数，如Chisq/df = 2.25和比较拟合指数CFI = 0.93。最终版本的AEMEQ有20个项目，在大多数维度上显示出可接受的可靠性，各成分之间存在强相关性。