中国广州本地登革热患者的咨询行为及影响其就医犹豫的因素:一项回顾性分析
Consultation behaviors and factors influencing hesitation to seek medical care among local dengue patients in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective analysis.
作者信息
Luo Haipeng, Liu Wenhui, Luo Lei, Zhang Zhoubin
机构信息
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Department of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, 510440, China.
出版信息
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;25(1):2984. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24271-1.
BACKGROUND
Dengue fever remains a significant public health challenge in Guangzhou, China, where healthcare-seeking behavior plays a critical role in shaping disease outcomes. This study investigates patterns of consultation delays and their determinants among locally acquired dengue cases from 2015 to 2024, aiming to inform targeted public health interventions.
METHODS
Surveillance data on locally acquired dengue fever cases in Guangzhou were extracted from Chinese National Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting Information System for analysis. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies and percentages (, %), while continuous variables were presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Chi-square tests were used to examine differences in symptom onset and consultation timing across groups with varying demographic characteristics, and non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum tests assessed variations in consultation hesitation time (defined as the interval from symptom onset to medical consultation). To identify determinants of delayed care-seeking, a modified Poisson regression model with robust error variance adjustment was employed, incorporating key demographic characteristics as predictors.
RESULTS
From 2015 to 2024, Guangzhou recorded 8,533 locally acquired dengue fever cases, with men accounting for 52.5% of cases (men-to-women ratio = 1.12:1). The overall median healthcare-seeking delay was 4 days (IQR 2–6). Notable spatiotemporal variation emerged, as residents of non-central areas presented earlier than those in urban centers (median 3 vs. 4 days), and while the median delay remained unchanged during high-incidence months, the interquartile range (IQR) narrowed from 3 to 6 days in low-incidence months to 2–6 days in high-incidence months. This contraction in IQR suggests more proactive healthcare-seeking behavior during epidemic periods (=-4.321, < 0.001). Multivariable Poisson regression with robust standard errors confirmed significantly longer delays during low-incidence periods ( = 1.122, 95%:1.052–1.196). Weekend consultation rates decreased significantly during high-incidence months across most subgroups, though no significant weekday-weekend differences were observed among individuals in high-exposure occupations or during low-incidence periods ( > 0.05). Age-stratified analysis demonstrated significantly increased delay risk across all younger age groups compared to patients ≥ 65 years, with the greatest risk elevation in children and adolescents aged 0–18 years ( = 1.538, 95%:1.436–1.648), followed by adults aged 41–65 years ( = 1.093, 95%:1.053–1.134) and 19–40 years ( = 1.067, 95%:1.027–1.108), revealing a bimodal delay pattern. Distinct occupational gradients were equally apparent in the analysis. Workers in low exposure-risk occupations experienced the longest median delays (median 5 days; IQR 4–7) and highest adjusted risk ( = 1.429, 95%:1.341–1.523) compared with high-risk occupations, while moderate-risk occupations showed both the shortest delays (median 2 days, IQR 1–3) and significantly reduced risk ( = 0.652, 95% = 0.609–0.699). Similarly, special populations demonstrated reduced risk ( = 0.658, 95%:0.611–0.708).
CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights systematic disparities in dengue fever healthcare-seeking behavior, driven by occupational exposure risk, seasonal transmission dynamics, and demographic factors. To reduce delays, urgent implementation of targeted interventions is required. Interventions should incorporate health education initiatives in workplaces for high exposure risk occupational groups, while also focusing on low exposure risk occupational groups and urban residents experiencing delays in seeking care. Additionally, expanding weekend healthcare accessibility and developing age-specific education programs are essential to enhance epidemic response efficiency and reduce disease burden.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-025-24271-1.
背景
在中国广州,登革热仍然是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,就医行为在塑造疾病结局方面起着关键作用。本研究调查了2015年至2024年本地感染登革热病例的就诊延迟模式及其决定因素,旨在为有针对性的公共卫生干预措施提供依据。
方法
从中国国家法定传染病报告信息系统中提取广州本地感染登革热病例的监测数据进行分析。分类变量以频率和百分比(,%)进行汇总,连续变量以中位数和四分位数间距(IQR)表示。卡方检验用于检验不同人口特征组之间症状出现和就诊时间的差异,非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验评估就诊犹豫时间(定义为从症状出现到就医的间隔)的差异。为了确定延迟就医的决定因素,采用了具有稳健误差方差调整的修正泊松回归模型,将关键人口特征作为预测变量。
结果
2015年至2024年,广州共记录了8533例本地感染登革热病例,其中男性占病例的52.5%(男女比例为1.12:1)。总体就医延迟中位数为4天(IQR 2 - 6)。出现了明显的时空差异,非中心城区居民就诊时间早于市中心居民(中位数分别为3天和4天),虽然在高发月份延迟中位数保持不变,但四分位数间距(IQR)从低发月份的3至6天缩小至高发月份的2至6天。IQR的这种收缩表明在流行期间就医行为更加积极主动(=-4.321,<0.001)。具有稳健标准误差的多变量泊松回归证实,在低发期延迟时间显著更长(=1.122,95%:1.052 - 1.196)。在大多数亚组中,高发月份周末就诊率显著下降,不过在高暴露职业人群或低发期个体中未观察到工作日与周末的显著差异(>0.05)。年龄分层分析表明,与≥65岁的患者相比,所有较年轻年龄组的延迟风险显著增加,0至18岁儿童和青少年的风险升高最大(=1.538,95%:1.436 - 1.648),其次是41至65岁的成年人(=1.093,95%:1.053 - 1.134)和19至40岁的成年人(=1.067,95%:1.027 - 1.108),呈现出双峰延迟模式。分析中不同职业梯度也同样明显。与高风险职业相比,低暴露风险职业的工人延迟中位数最长(中位数5天;IQR 4 - 7)且调整后风险最高(=1.429,95%:1.341 - 1.523),而中等风险职业的延迟最短(中位数2天,IQR 1 - 3)且风险显著降低(=0.652,95% = 0.609 - 0.699)。同样,特殊人群的风险降低(=0.658,95%:0.611 - 0.708)。
结论
本研究突出了登革热就医行为中的系统性差异,这些差异由职业暴露风险、季节性传播动态和人口因素驱动。为减少延迟,需要紧急实施有针对性的干预措施。干预措施应包括针对高暴露风险职业群体的工作场所健康教育举措,同时也应关注低暴露风险职业群体和就医延迟的城市居民。此外,扩大周末医疗可及性并制定针对特定年龄的教育计划对于提高疫情应对效率和减轻疾病负担至关重要。
补充信息
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12889 - 025 - 24271 - 1获取的补充材料。
相似文献
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-7-3
BMC Psychiatry. 2025-8-8
本文引用的文献
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024-5-25
Lancet. 2024-2-17
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023-11-22