Cohen Matthew L, Boulton Aaron J, Tyner Callie E, Slotkin Jerry, Weintraub Sandra, Gershon Richard C, Dodge Hiroko H, Tulsky David S
Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2025 Sep 1:1-11. doi: 10.1017/S1355617725101276.
Because of the complexity of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) clinical presentations across bio-psycho-social domains of functioning, data-reduction approaches, such as latent profile analysis (LPA), can be useful for studying profiles rather than individual symptoms. Previous LPA research has resulted in more precise characterization and understanding of patients, better clarity regarding the probability and rate of disease progression, and an empirical approach to identifying those who might benefit most from early intervention. Whereas previous LPA research has revealed useful cognitive, neuropsychiatric, or functional subtypes of patients with AD, no study has identified patient profiles that span the domains of health and functioning and that also include motor and sensory functioning.
LPA was conducted with data from the Advancing Reliable Measurement in Alzheimer's Disease and cognitive Aging study. Participants were 209 older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) or mild dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT). LPA indicator variables were from the NIH Toolbox® and included cognitive, emotional, social, motor, and sensory domains of functioning.
The data were best modeled with a 4-profile solution. The latent profiles were most differentiated by indices of social and emotional functioning and least differentiated by motor and sensory function.
These multi-domain patient profiles support and extend previous findings on single-domain profiles and highlight the importance of social and emotional factors for understanding patient experiences of aMCI/DAT. Future research should investigate these profiles further to better understand risk and resilience factors, the stability of these profiles over time, and responses to intervention.
由于阿尔茨海默病(AD)在生物 - 心理 - 社会功能领域临床表现的复杂性,数据简化方法,如潜在类别分析(LPA),对于研究概况而非个体症状可能是有用的。先前的LPA研究已更精确地刻画和理解了患者,更清晰地了解了疾病进展的概率和速率,并提供了一种实证方法来识别那些可能从早期干预中获益最大的人。尽管先前的LPA研究已经揭示了AD患者有用的认知、神经精神或功能亚型,但尚无研究确定跨越健康和功能领域且还包括运动和感觉功能的患者概况。
使用来自阿尔茨海默病和认知老化研究中推进可靠测量的数据进行LPA。参与者为209名患有遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)或阿尔茨海默病型轻度痴呆(DAT)的老年人。LPA指标变量来自美国国立卫生研究院工具箱®,包括功能的认知、情感、社会、运动和感觉领域。
数据用四类别解决方案建模效果最佳。潜在类别在社会和情感功能指标上差异最大,在运动和感觉功能上差异最小。
这些多领域患者概况支持并扩展了先前关于单领域概况的研究结果,并强调了社会和情感因素对于理解aMCI/DAT患者体验的重要性。未来的研究应进一步调查这些概况,以更好地理解风险和恢复力因素、这些概况随时间的稳定性以及对干预的反应。