• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学院校的学习风格或学习方法:一项关于向水中投石子的研究。

Learning styles or study approaches in medical schools: a study of a pebble thrown into the water.

作者信息

Özeke Vildan, Budakoğlu Işıl İrem, Coşkun Özlem, Akçapınar Gökhan

机构信息

Curriculum & Instruction, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, Turkey.

Medical Education and Informatics, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07818-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07818-z
PMID:40890776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12400576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the relationships between medical students’ learning styles and their study approaches. While learning styles have been criticized and debated, study approaches are recognized for their association with academic success. Understanding these dynamics can enhance educational practices in medical education by catering to diverse student needs.

METHODS

The study employs a descriptive research model with 1724 medical students using the VARK questionnaire and ASSIST inventory. We applied cluster analysis with the k-means algorithm to group students based on their learning styles. The Chi-square test of independence was used to explore the association between learning styles and study approaches.

RESULTS

Kinesthetic and Aural styles were most common, followed by Read-Write. Surface-apathetic was the most frequent study approach, followed by strategic and deep approaches. Multimodal learners showed a strong positive association with the deep approach and a negative one with the strategic approach. Kinesthetic learners also favored the deep approach, while Read-Write learners aligned with the strategic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the importance of recognizing the interaction between medical students’ learning style preferences and their adopted study approaches. These results can guide medical educators in designing more diverse and student-centered pedagogical strategies. Overall, the study highlights the value of promoting learners’ metacognitive awareness and fostering the development of flexible learning strategies rather than rigidly aligning instruction with specific learning styles.

摘要

背景

本研究调查医学生的学习风格与其学习方法之间的关系。虽然学习风格一直受到批评和争议,但学习方法因其与学业成就的关联而得到认可。了解这些动态关系可以通过满足不同学生的需求来加强医学教育中的教学实践。

方法

本研究采用描述性研究模型,对1724名医学生使用VARK问卷和ASSIST量表。我们应用k均值算法进行聚类分析,根据学生的学习风格对他们进行分组。使用卡方独立性检验来探索学习风格与学习方法之间的关联。

结果

动觉型和听觉型学习风格最为常见,其次是读写型。表面冷漠型是最常见的学习方法,其次是策略型和深入型。多模态学习者与深入型学习方法呈强烈正相关,与策略型学习方法呈负相关。动觉型学习者也倾向于深入型学习方法,而读写型学习者则与策略型学习方法一致。

结论

研究结果强调了认识医学生学习风格偏好与其采用的学习方法之间相互作用的重要性。这些结果可以指导医学教育工作者设计更多样化和以学生为中心的教学策略。总体而言,该研究强调了提高学习者元认知意识和促进灵活学习策略发展的价值,而不是将教学严格地与特定学习风格保持一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/84885704a7e4/12909_2025_7818_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/0f383ea13ccd/12909_2025_7818_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/0954dfab616b/12909_2025_7818_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/84885704a7e4/12909_2025_7818_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/0f383ea13ccd/12909_2025_7818_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/0954dfab616b/12909_2025_7818_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12400576/84885704a7e4/12909_2025_7818_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning styles or study approaches in medical schools: a study of a pebble thrown into the water.医学院校的学习风格或学习方法:一项关于向水中投石子的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07818-z.
2
Profiling learning styles and strategies of nursing students: A cluster analysis study.剖析护生的学习风格与策略:一项聚类分析研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Nov;154:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106840. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
3
The dual mediating role of coping style between resilience and negative emotions in nursing undergraduates: a cross-sectional study.应对方式在护理本科生心理弹性与负性情绪间的双重中介作用:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03393-2.
4
Impact of Learning Style on Medical Students' Satisfaction With Hands-On Procedural Training.学习风格对医学生实践操作培训满意度的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87543. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87543. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Characterization and simulation of conglomerate reservoirs using core data of Triassic Baikouquan Formation, Mahu Depression.利用玛湖凹陷三叠系百口泉组岩心资料对砾岩油藏进行表征与模拟
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 11;15(1):29293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09954-4.
6
Improving Clinical Reasoning Skills With Machine Learning K-Means Algorithm.运用机器学习K均值算法提升临床推理技能
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70250. doi: 10.1111/jep.70250.
7
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
8
Complexity-based unsupervised machine learning for patient-specific VMAT quality assurance.基于复杂性的无监督机器学习用于患者特异性容积调强放疗质量保证。
Med Phys. 2025 Sep;52(9):e18013. doi: 10.1002/mp.18013.
9
e-Learning in Phoniatrics and Speech-Language Pathology: Exploratory Analysis of Free Access Tools in Augmentative and Alternative Communication.语音病理学和言语语言病理学中的电子学习:辅助和替代沟通中免费获取工具的探索性分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jun 27;11:e63392. doi: 10.2196/63392.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Do learning style preferences influence the cumulative gross point average and self directed learning hours in dental students: a preliminary study.学习风格偏好是否会影响牙科学员的累计总学分绩点和自主学习时间:一项初步研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03535-z.
2
Learning Styles/Preferences Among Medical Students: Kinesthetic Learner's Multimodal Approach to Learning Anatomy.医学生的学习风格/偏好:动觉学习者学习解剖学的多模态方法。
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Aug 27;30(4):1633-1638. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01049-1. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
The Learning Styles Neuromyth Is Still Thriving in Medical Education.
学习风格神经迷思在医学教育中依然盛行。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Aug 11;15:708540. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.708540. eCollection 2021.
4
Types of Learners.学习者类型。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021 Jun;44(2):141-148. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Tips for teaching procedural skills.教授程序性技能的技巧。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(Suppl 2):458. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02284-1.
6
Learning styles and approaches among medical education participants.医学教育参与者的学习风格与方法。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Sep 30;8:181. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_95_19. eCollection 2019.
7
Results of a study assessing teaching methods of faculty after measuring student learning style preference.在测量学生学习风格偏好后评估教师教学方法的一项研究结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Evidence-Based Higher Education - Is the Learning Styles 'Myth' Important?基于证据的高等教育——学习风格“神话”重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 27;8:444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444. eCollection 2017.
9
Does tailoring instructional style to a medical student's self-perceived learning style improve performance when teaching intravenous catheter placement? A randomized controlled study.在教授静脉导管置入术时,根据医学生自我认知的学习风格调整教学方式是否能提高学习效果?一项随机对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 12;16(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0720-3.
10
The Learning Styles Myth is Thriving in Higher Education.“学习风格神话”在高等教育中盛行。
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 15;6:1908. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01908. eCollection 2015.