• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析护生的学习风格与策略:一项聚类分析研究。

Profiling learning styles and strategies of nursing students: A cluster analysis study.

作者信息

Ge Hui, Feng Tingting, Hu Huiling, Li Jiashuai, Wu Xue

机构信息

Peking University, School of Nursing, Beijing 100191, China.

Peking University, School of Nursing, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Nov;154:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106840. Epub 2025 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106840
PMID:40752072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A learner profile, as a method for presenting students' core characteristics and behaviors, has been widely recognized in personalized education, yet it remains underexplored in the context of diversified nursing teaching modes. Nursing requires the application of theoretical knowledge of the curriculum to clinical practice procedures, demanding that nursing students not only absorb information but also transform, integrate, and critically apply it in dynamic, real-world settings. Investigating nursing students' learning style preferences and behavioral strategies is critical for understanding how to adapt teaching methods to meet varied learning needs, thereby enhancing teaching quality and improving student learning outcomes.

AIM

To explore a nursing learner profile by analyzing learning styles and strategies, providing insights for integrating diversified teaching modes with personalized learning.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 303 nursing students from two public universities. Data collection included sociodemographic information, learning styles, and learning strategies. Clustering ensemble analysis, including voting and consensus matrix methods, was performed to identify a learner profile.

RESULTS

A total of 241 valid questionnaires were analyzed, with the majority of participants being female (80.08 %) and an average age of 20.8 ± 1.79. Most students considered blended online and offline teaching (65.56 %) and scenario-based simulation teaching (28.22 %) to be the most effective teaching modes. Six distinct learner clusters were identified, each exhibiting differences in background characteristics, learning styles, and learning strategies: intuitive efficient learners (cluster 1), efficient uncertain learners (cluster 2), intrinsic-driven global learners (cluster 3), reflective independent learners (cluster 4), verbal logical learners (cluster 5), and extrinsic-driven inefficient learners (cluster 6).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the diversity of nursing learners and the need for personalized teaching approaches. A nursing learner profile provides a foundation for designing tailored instructional strategies and addressing individual differences in nursing education.

摘要

背景

学习者概况作为一种呈现学生核心特征和行为的方法,在个性化教育中已得到广泛认可,但在多元化护理教学模式的背景下仍未得到充分探索。护理工作需要将课程的理论知识应用于临床实践程序,这要求护理专业学生不仅要吸收信息,还要在动态的现实环境中对其进行转化、整合和批判性应用。调查护理专业学生的学习风格偏好和行为策略对于理解如何调整教学方法以满足不同的学习需求至关重要,从而提高教学质量并改善学生的学习成果。

目的

通过分析学习风格和策略来探索护理学习者概况,为将多元化教学模式与个性化学习相结合提供见解。

方法

对来自两所公立大学的303名护理专业学生进行了横断面研究。数据收集包括社会人口统计学信息、学习风格和学习策略。采用聚类集成分析,包括投票和共识矩阵方法,来确定学习者概况。

结果

共分析了241份有效问卷,大多数参与者为女性(80.08%),平均年龄为20.8±1.79岁。大多数学生认为线上线下混合教学(65.5

相似文献

1
Profiling learning styles and strategies of nursing students: A cluster analysis study.剖析护生的学习风格与策略:一项聚类分析研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Nov;154:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106840. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
2
The effects of flipped classroom and jigsaw teaching strategies on learning, retention of course content, and satisfaction among nursing students: a quasi-experimental study.翻转课堂和拼图教学策略对护生学习、课程内容掌握及满意度的影响:一项准实验研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1118. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07662-1.
3
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
4
Six teaching methods on the effectiveness of community nursing education for nursing students in China: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.中国针对护生的社区护理教育有效性的六种教学方法:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Mar;84:104323. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104323. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
5
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Physical health proficiencies in mental health nursing education: Student nurses' perspectives.心理健康护理教育中的身体健康素养:学生护士的观点。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2025 Aug;87:104493. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104493. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
9
Comparison of the impact of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on nursing students' core competencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于团队学习与基于讲座学习对护理学生核心能力影响的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Mar;76:103945. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103945. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
10
Cultural Competence of Nursing Students After Their First Supervised Internships: An International Cross-Sectional Study.护理专业学生首次督导实习后的文化能力:一项国际横断面研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70068. doi: 10.1111/inr.70068.