Faus-Cotino Javier, Amarilla-Irusta Ainhoa, Guerrero Jose Antonio, Sarriugarte Aingeru, Andia Isabel
Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, Cruces University Hospital, 48903, Barakaldo, Spain.
Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, 48903, Barakaldo, Spain.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Sep 2;35(1):378. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04483-2.
Combined injuries of the posterolateral corner (PLC) and proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) are uncommon but can lead to significant knee instability if not properly managed. While anatomical reconstruction techniques are well defined for isolated PLC injuries, the optimal strategy for managing associated PTFJ instability remains unclear. This review aims to evaluate surgical approaches and outcomes for combined PLC and PTFJ injuries.
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they described surgical management of PLC and PTFJ injuries. Data were extracted regarding patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, surgical techniques, fixation methods, and clinical outcomes. Due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome reporting, a narrative synthesis was performed.
Nine studies met inclusion criteria: one cadaveric biomechanical study, three retrospective series, and five case reports. Most injuries were due to high-energy trauma and commonly associated with multiligament knee injuries. PTFJ stabilization techniques included cortical screw fixation, K-wires, suture constructs, and ligament reconstruction. Despite variability in technique, outcomes were generally favorable when PTFJ instability was addressed in conjunction with PLC reconstruction. Functional scores were reported in only two studies. Documented complications included peroneal nerve palsy, hardware-related pain, infection, and arthrofibrosis.
PTFJ stability plays a critical role in the success of PLC reconstruction. Stabilizing the PTFJ-regardless of technique-appears essential for restoring knee stability. Given the low methodological quality and heterogeneity of current evidence, further prospective studies with standardized protocols are necessary to guide optimal management of these complex injuries.
后外侧角(PLC)与胫腓近端关节(PTFJ)的联合损伤并不常见,但如果处理不当可导致明显的膝关节不稳。虽然针对孤立的PLC损伤,解剖重建技术已明确,但处理相关PTFJ不稳的最佳策略仍不明确。本综述旨在评估PLC与PTFJ联合损伤的手术方法及疗效。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统综述。纳入描述PLC与PTFJ损伤手术治疗的研究。提取有关患者特征、损伤机制、手术技术、固定方法及临床疗效的数据。由于研究设计和结果报告存在异质性,故进行叙述性综合分析。
9项研究符合纳入标准:1项尸体生物力学研究、3项回顾性系列研究和5项病例报告。多数损伤由高能创伤所致,常合并膝关节多韧带损伤。PTFJ稳定技术包括皮质骨螺钉固定、克氏针、缝线结构及韧带重建。尽管技术存在差异,但在PLC重建的同时处理PTFJ不稳时,疗效总体良好。仅2项研究报告了功能评分。记录的并发症包括腓总神经麻痹、内植物相关疼痛、感染及关节纤维化。
PTFJ的稳定性对PLC重建的成功起着关键作用。无论采用何种技术,稳定PTFJ对于恢复膝关节稳定性似乎至关重要。鉴于当前证据的方法学质量较低且存在异质性,有必要开展更多采用标准化方案的前瞻性研究,以指导这些复杂损伤的最佳治疗。