• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性开角型青光眼患者和健康个体在最大和次最大握力任务期间的眼压反应。

Intraocular pressure responses during maximal and submaximal handgrip strength tasks in primary open-angle glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.

作者信息

González-Hernández Cristina, Morenas-Aguilar Maria Dolores, Redondo Beatriz, Janicijevic Danica, López-Gómez María José, Vera Jesus, García-Ramos Amador

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Andalucía, Spain.

CLARO (Clinical and Laboratory Applications of Research in Optometry) Laboratory, Department of Optics, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Andalucía, Spain.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2025 Aug 26;13:e19845. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19845. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.19845
PMID:40895067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12396205/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) responses during isometric handgrip strength tasks between primary open-angle glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.

METHODS

Forty older adults participated: 21 glaucoma patients and 19 controls. Participants randomly performed four trials at two intensities, maximal and submaximal (at 50% of self-perceived maximal effort), with two trials per hand (one for the left eye and one for the right eye). IOP was measured immediately before exercise, during exercise, and 5 seconds post-recovery. A four-factor mixed ANOVA was used to analyze IOP responses, with task intensity and time of measurement as within-subject factors, and group (glaucoma vs. control) and sex as the between-subjects factors.

RESULTS

IOP responses were comparable between glaucoma patients and healthy individuals, as the main effect of group ( = 0.117) and its interactions did not reach statistical significance. The main effect of time reached statistical significance ( = 0.016) due to greater IOP values during the task (17.3 ± 3.7 mmHg) compared to pre-exercise (16.3 ± 3.2 mmHg:  < 0.001), but post-exercise IOP (16.9 ± 4.1 mmHg) was not significantly different from pre-exercise ( = 0.334) or during exercise ( = 0.727). Greater IOP values were observed for the maximal task compared to the submaximal task ( = 0.001), with no differences between men and women ( = 0.699).

CONCLUSION

Submaximal isometric strength training is a safe option for glaucoma patients treated with hypotensive eye drops.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较原发性开角型青光眼患者与健康个体在等长握力任务期间的眼压(IOP)反应。

方法

40名老年人参与研究:21名青光眼患者和19名对照组。参与者在两种强度下随机进行四项试验,即最大强度和次最大强度(自我感知最大努力的50%),每只手进行两项试验(一只眼为左眼,另一只眼为右眼)。在运动前、运动期间和恢复后5秒测量眼压。采用四因素混合方差分析来分析眼压反应,任务强度和测量时间作为组内因素,组(青光眼与对照组)和性别作为组间因素。

结果

青光眼患者与健康个体的眼压反应具有可比性,因为组的主效应(=0.117)及其相互作用未达到统计学显著性。时间的主效应达到统计学显著性(=0.016),因为与运动前(16.3±3.2 mmHg:<0.001)相比,任务期间眼压值更高(17.3±3.7 mmHg),但运动后眼压(16.9±4.1 mmHg)与运动前(=0.334)或运动期间(=0.727)无显著差异。与次最大任务相比,最大任务的眼压值更高(=0.001),男性和女性之间无差异(=0.699)。

结论

次最大等长力量训练对于使用降眼压眼药水治疗的青光眼患者是一种安全的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc6/12396205/a50f72037ddf/peerj-13-19845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc6/12396205/7bc0944edc99/peerj-13-19845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc6/12396205/a50f72037ddf/peerj-13-19845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc6/12396205/7bc0944edc99/peerj-13-19845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbc6/12396205/a50f72037ddf/peerj-13-19845-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Intraocular pressure responses during maximal and submaximal handgrip strength tasks in primary open-angle glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.原发性开角型青光眼患者和健康个体在最大和次最大握力任务期间的眼压反应。
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 26;13:e19845. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19845. eCollection 2025.
2
Perioperative medications for preventing temporarily increased intraocular pressure after laser trabeculoplasty.用于预防激光小梁成形术后眼压暂时升高的围手术期药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):CD010746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010746.pub2.
3
A Study of 24-h Efficacy and Safety of Sepetaprost vs. Latanoprost in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.司普他前列素与拉坦前列素治疗原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的24小时疗效和安全性研究
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03227-2.
4
Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.用于青光眼的穹窿部结膜小梁切除术瓣与角膜缘部结膜小梁切除术瓣对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 25;11(11):CD009380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009380.pub2.
5
Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.基于穹窿部的与基于角巩膜缘的结膜小梁切除术瓣治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8(8):CD009380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009380.pub3.
6
Rho kinase inhibitor for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.Rho 激酶抑制剂治疗原发性开角型青光眼和高眼压症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 10;6(6):CD013817. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013817.pub2.
7
Peripheral iridotomy for pigmentary glaucoma.色素性青光眼的周边虹膜切开术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 12;2(2):CD005655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005655.pub2.
8
Cyclodestructive procedures for non-refractory glaucoma.非难治性青光眼的睫状体破坏手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD009313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009313.pub2.
9
Laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.激光小梁成形术治疗开角型青光眼和高眼压症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD003919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003919.pub3.
10
PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt as a treatment option for highly increased intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.PRESERFLO™微型分流器作为原发性开角型青光眼和假性剥脱性青光眼眼内压大幅升高的一种治疗选择。
Eye (Lond). 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03843-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute Effects of Resistance Exercise on Intraocular Pressure in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review.抗阻运动对健康成年人眼内压的急性影响:系统评价。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Feb 1;38(2):394-404. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004668. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
2
The Association of Physical Activity with Glaucoma and Related Traits in the UK Biobank.体力活动与英国生物库中青光眼及相关特征的关联。
Ophthalmology. 2023 Oct;130(10):1024-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Influence of the body positions adopted for resistance training on intraocular pressure: a comparison between the supine and seated positions.
抗阻训练中采用的体位对眼压的影响:仰卧位与座位的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;261(7):1971-1978. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06009-0. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Analysis of aerobic exercise influence on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: A randomized clinical trial.有氧运动对原发性开角型青光眼患者眼压和眼内灌注压影响的分析:一项随机临床试验。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4228-4234. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1195_22.
5
Acute Intraocular Pressure Responses to Resistance Training in Combination With Blood Flow Restriction.抗阻训练联合血流限制对眼内压的急性反应。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023 Dec;94(4):1110-1116. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2022.2119197. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Effect of wearing different types of face masks during dynamic and isometric resistance training on intraocular pressure.不同类型口罩在动态和等长抗阻训练中对眼压的影响。
Clin Exp Optom. 2023 Jul;106(5):503-508. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2054315. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Intraocular Pressure Responses to Four Different Isometric Exercises in Men and Women.男性和女性四种等长运动对眼压的反应。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Aug;97(8):648-653. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001545.
8
Determinant Factors of Intraocular Pressure Responses to a Maximal Isometric Handgrip Test: Hand Dominance, Handgrip Strength and Sex.最大等长握力测试中眼压反应的决定因素:优势手、握力和性别。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Jan;46(1):64-70. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1780265. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
9
Dual effect of the Valsalva maneuver on autonomic nervous system activity, intraocular pressure, Schlemm's canal, and iridocorneal angle morphology.瓦尔萨尔瓦动作对自主神经系统活动、眼内压、施莱姆氏管和房角形态的双重影响。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1275-y.
10
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.美国人体育活动指南。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.