Bu Feifei, Cernat Alexandru, Steptoe Andrew, Fancourt Daisy
Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Social Statistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Field methods. 2025 Jan 8;37(3):244-259. doi: 10.1177/1525822X241289870. eCollection 2025 Aug.
This article examines factors associated with survey attrition/retention in an online panel survey with weekly/monthly follow-ups during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also explores the effectiveness of making contact with dropout participants and factors associated with sample re-engagement, as well as motivations and barriers to maintaining survey participation. Our data consisted of over 1.2 million records from over 70,000 participants collected between March 2020 and April 2022. On average, 92.7% participants during weekly follow-ups and 95.9% during monthly follow-ups participated again in a later wave. The high retention rates, to some extent, could be attributed to a high level of altruistic motivations during a global health crisis and to the use of retention strategies to create a project community. A similar set of factors were related to both survey attrition/retention and re-engagement. However, some differences were also found, indicating the possibility of distinct decision processes.
本文研究了在新冠疫情期间进行的在线小组调查中,与调查损耗/留存相关的因素。该调查每周/每月进行一次跟进。本文还探讨了与退出调查的参与者取得联系的有效性、与样本重新参与相关的因素,以及维持调查参与度的动机和障碍。我们的数据包括2020年3月至2022年4月期间从7万多名参与者那里收集的120多万条记录。平均而言,在每周跟进期间,92.7%的参与者在后续的调查中再次参与;在每月跟进期间,这一比例为95.9%。高留存率在一定程度上可归因于全球健康危机期间高度的利他动机,以及使用留存策略来创建一个项目社区。与调查损耗/留存和重新参与相关的因素有相似之处。然而,也发现了一些差异,这表明可能存在不同的决策过程。