Hu Xiaobang, Fanburg-Smith Julie C, Ruggiero Francesca M, Roy Justin B, Pantaleon Vasquez Robert, Moyer Matthew T, Mathew Abraham
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 28;17(7):e88911. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88911. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Background Gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs) represent a subset of gastric polyps that are clinically problematic when large and they can cause persistent, low-grade bleeding or gastric outlet obstruction. Rare malignant transformation has been reported, albeit not in our experience. Methods We retrospectively studied the clinicopathologic characteristics of large GHPs (≥20 mm) excised by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) between 2013 and 2020 at a single institution. Results Ten patients underwent 37 resections by ESD (n=16), EMR (n=15), and snare resection (SR, n=6). For patients with available follow-up endoscopies, the overall recurrence rate was 9/13 (69.2%) for ESD procedures, 14/14 (100%) for EMR procedures, and 2/2 (100%) for SR procedures, with an average follow-up time of 9.4 months. All cases excised by ESD without recurrence had negative deep and lateral margins. The most common adverse event associated with ESD and EMR is bleeding. Histological examination reveals classic features of gastric hyperplasia, including superficial ulceration, granulation tissue with reactive basal atypia, gastropathy and gastritis-like features. There was one case with intestinal metaplasia, yet none revealed dysplasia or neoplasia and all the studied samples were negative for organisms by immunostaining. Conclusions Large GHPs are clinically challenging and difficult to eradicate with a high rate of recurrence when excised by EMR or SR. ESD appears to be more effective than EMR and SR for complete resection. As the deep margins are almost always negative for ESD specimens, it appears that GHP has a field effect with local recurrence at the lateral margins. Pinning and inking the lateral margins of friable specimens intraoperatively may be helpful for pathologic examination.
背景 胃增生性息肉(GHPs)是胃息肉的一个子集,当息肉较大时会产生临床问题,可导致持续性轻度出血或胃出口梗阻。虽有罕见的恶变报道,但我们并无相关经验。方法 我们回顾性研究了2013年至2020年在单一机构通过内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)或内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)切除的大型胃增生性息肉(≥20mm)的临床病理特征。结果 10例患者接受了37次切除手术,其中ESD(n = 16)、EMR(n = 15)和圈套器切除术(SR,n = 6)。对于有可用随访内镜检查的患者,ESD手术的总体复发率为9/13(69.2%),EMR手术为14/14(100%),SR手术为2/2(100%),平均随访时间为9.4个月。所有经ESD切除且无复发的病例切缘深部和侧切缘均为阴性。与ESD和EMR相关的最常见不良事件是出血。组织学检查显示胃增生的典型特征,包括浅表溃疡、伴有反应性基底异型性的肉芽组织、胃病和胃炎样特征。有1例肠化生,但均未发现发育异常或肿瘤形成,所有研究样本免疫染色均未发现微生物。结论 大型胃增生性息肉具有临床挑战性,通过EMR或SR切除时难以根除且复发率高。ESD在完整切除方面似乎比EMR和SR更有效。由于ESD标本的深部切缘几乎总是阴性,似乎胃增生性息肉存在一种场效应,侧切缘会出现局部复发。术中对易碎标本的侧切缘进行标记和染色可能有助于病理检查。