Onishi Kunihiro, Tanaka Shigeharu, Maki Atsutoshi, Taniguchi Shinichi, Iwaki Hiroyoshi, Miura Yasushi
Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka Orthopedic Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Tokyo Kasei University, Sayama, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):e89123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89123. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Objective Knee effusion is a clinically significant symptom associated with pain and functional impairment in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This study aimed to investigate whether the difference in thigh circumferences measured at two distinct proximal sites could serve as a useful indicator of "knee swelling," particularly "joint effusion," in KOA patients. In this study, knee swelling was assessed using thigh circumference, and joint effusion was quantitatively measured using ultrasonography. Methods A total of 176 KOA patients who were admitted for total knee arthroplasty between June 2023 and June 2024 were included. Preoperative assessments involved measuring the thigh circumference 5 and 10 cm proximally from the superior border of the patella using a tape measure, and quantifying suprapatellar pouch area as an indicator of joint effusion using sagittal ultrasonographic imaging. The association between the suprapatellar bursa area and femoral circumference at 5 and 10 cm proximal to the suprapatellar border, and the difference between these circumferences was determined using Spearman's correlation. Additionally, A simple linear regression analysis was performed, with thigh swelling as the independent variable and joint effusion as the dependent variable. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Data from 96 patients (mean age 73.8 ± 8.0 years; Kellgren-Lawrence grade II: 7, III: 50, IV: 39) were analyzed. The mean thigh circumference at 5 and 10 cm proximal to the patella was 40.2 ± 4.4 and 43.8 ± 4.8 cm, respectively, with a mean difference of 3.6 ± 1.2 cm. The average sagittal area of the suprapatellar bursa was 132.4 ± 98.8 mm². The correlation between suprapatellar bursa area and thigh circumference at 5 cm proximal to the superior border of the patella was not significant (r = 0.028, p = 0.789). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between the suprapatellar bursa area and thigh circumference at 10 cm proximal to the superior border of the patella (r = -0.047, p = 0.648). However, a significant correlation was found between suprapatellar bursa area and the difference in thigh circumference measurements at 5 and 10 cm proximal to the superior border of the patella (r = -0.248, p = 0.015). The regression analysis revealed a significant association only between the area of the suprapatellar bursa and the difference in thigh circumference between the two sites (p < 0.05, r = 0.258). Discussion While individual thigh circumference measurements showed no significant relationship with joint effusion, the difference between the two measurement sites was significantly associated with effusion. These findings suggest that calculating the difference between thigh circumferences may reduce the influence of muscle mass, fat, and edema, thereby enhancing the estimation of knee effusion. Conclusion Assessment of knee swelling using the difference in thigh circumference 5 and 10 cm proximal to the suprapatellar border is a useful and simple method of assessing joint effusion in patients with KOA.
目的 膝关节积液是膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者临床上与疼痛和功能障碍相关的重要症状。本研究旨在探讨在两个不同近端部位测量的大腿周径差异是否可作为KOA患者“膝关节肿胀”尤其是“关节积液”的有用指标。在本研究中,使用大腿周径评估膝关节肿胀,并使用超声对关节积液进行定量测量。
方法 纳入2023年6月至2024年6月期间因全膝关节置换术入院的176例KOA患者。术前评估包括使用卷尺在髌骨上缘近端5 cm和10 cm处测量大腿周径,并使用矢状面超声成像将髌上囊面积量化为关节积液的指标。使用Spearman相关性分析确定髌上囊面积与髌上缘近端5 cm和10 cm处的股骨周径之间的关联以及这些周径之间的差异。此外,以大腿肿胀为自变量、关节积液为因变量进行简单线性回归分析。设定统计学显著性为p < 0.05。
结果 分析了96例患者的数据(平均年龄73.8 ± 8.0岁;Kellgren-Lawrence分级II级:7例,III级:50例,IV级:39例)。髌骨近端5 cm和10 cm处的平均大腿周径分别为40.2 ± 4.4 cm和43.8 ± 4.8 cm,平均差值为3.6 ± 1.2 cm。髌上囊的平均矢状面面积为132.4 ± 98.8 mm²。髌上囊面积与髌骨上缘近端5 cm处的大腿周径之间无显著相关性(r = 0.028,p = 0.789)。同样,髌上囊面积与髌骨上缘近端10 cm处的大腿周径之间也无显著相关性(r = -0.047,p = 0.648)。然而,发现髌上囊面积与髌骨上缘近端5 cm和10 cm处大腿周径测量值的差异之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.248,p = 0.015)。回归分析仅显示髌上囊面积与两个部位之间大腿周径的差异存在显著关联(p < 0.05,r = 0.258)。
讨论 虽然单个大腿周径测量值与关节积液无显著关系,但两个测量部位之间的差异与积液显著相关。这些发现表明,计算大腿周径之间的差异可能会减少肌肉质量、脂肪和水肿的影响,从而提高对膝关节积液的估计。
结论 使用髌上缘近端5 cm和10 cm处大腿周径的差异评估膝关节肿胀是一种评估KOA患者关节积液的有用且简单的方法。