Lopez Victor, Chacón Melissa, Arias María Jesús, Rojas Anthony, Arias Jessica, Vanegas Paula, Apuy Rodríguez Fiorella, Saenz Manuel E
Hospital Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, USA.
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, CRI.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88989. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The role of intravenous (IV) iron in chronic heart failure (HF) has been well studied, becoming a class IA recommendation. However, its role in acute heart failure (AHF) is less well-known. Multiple studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), have been published; however, their clinical benefit remains controversial. We aim to provide enough evidence to support decision-making in this clinical scenario. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of IV iron in patients admitted with AHF and iron deficiency (ID). PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for trials published up to July 1, 2024. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across trials. Outcomes included HF and all-cause re-hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and mean change in hemoglobin levels. Of the 362 database results, three RCTs, six observational studies, and 3,588 patients were included. In total, 1,622 (45.2%) patients received IV iron. Re-hospitalization for HF (RR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.76-1.21; p = 0.74; I² = 74%) showed a downward trend, but this was not statistically significant. Neither was all-cause rehospitalization (RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.90-1.19; p = 0.64; I² = 3%) nor all-cause mortality (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.81-1.24; p = 0.87; I² = 0%). A statistically significant mean change in the hemoglobin levels (MD = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.33-1.27; p = 0.0003; I² = 88%) was documented between both groups. In patients with AHF and ID, treatment with IV iron improves hemoglobin levels. Yet, this improvement does not appear to have a significant impact on rehospitalization or all-cause mortality rates. Larger RCTs are needed to further study its effect on clinical outcomes.
静脉注射铁剂在慢性心力衰竭(HF)中的作用已得到充分研究,成为IA类推荐。然而,其在急性心力衰竭(AHF)中的作用尚鲜为人知。包括随机对照试验(RCT)在内的多项研究已发表;然而,其临床益处仍存在争议。我们旨在提供足够的证据来支持这一临床情况下的决策制定。我们对因AHF和缺铁(ID)入院的患者使用静脉注射铁剂进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane数据库,以查找截至2024年7月1日发表的试验。汇总各试验的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)的平均差(MD)。结局包括心力衰竭和全因再次住院、全因死亡率以及血红蛋白水平的平均变化。在362个数据库结果中,纳入了3项RCT、6项观察性研究和3588例患者。总共1622例(45.2%)患者接受了静脉注射铁剂。因心力衰竭再次住院(RR = 0.96;95% CI = 0.76 - 1.21;p = = 0.74;I² = 74%)呈下降趋势,但无统计学意义。全因再次住院(RR = 1.03;95% CI = 0.90 - 1.19;p = 0.64;I² = 3%)和全因死亡率(RR = 1.00;95% CI = 0.81 - 1.24;p = 0.87;I² = 0%)也无统计学意义。两组之间血红蛋白水平有统计学意义的平均变化(MD = 0.80;95% CI = 0.33 - 1.27;p = 0.0003;I² = 88%)。在AHF和ID患者中,静脉注射铁剂治疗可提高血红蛋白水平。然而,这种改善似乎对再次住院率或全因死亡率没有显著影响。需要更大规模的RCT来进一步研究其对临床结局的影响。