Perrin Ashika, Moles Angela T, Offord Catherine A, Slavich Eve, Zeng Karen, Everingham Susan E
Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Australian PlantBank Botanic Gardens of Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 27;15(9):e71923. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71923. eCollection 2025 Sep.
In photoperiod sensitive plants, the timing of phenological events depends primarily on day length rather than temperature, precipitation or other environmental variables. This may make these photoperiod sensitive species less able to respond to climate change as their phenologies are more tightly controlled by day length conditions, which remain constant into the future, than by changing climatic conditions. We measured germination under three light treatments (short-day, long-day and equal light and dark) to quantify species' germination photoperiod sensitivity. We developed a novel metric that provides a continuous measure of germination photoperiod sensitivity for 67 plant species across a range of locations, habitats and growth forms. Of the 67 species, four species had significantly more seeds germinate in the long-day treatment, three species had significantly higher germination in the short-day treatment, and four species had significantly higher germination in the intermediate-day treatment. We then used this metric to quantify the relationships between germination photoperiod sensitivity (as quantified from the laboratory tests and calculated metric) and phylogeny, seed size, growth form, latitude, leaf area index (LAI) and ecosystem type. We also quantified the relationships between flowering photoperiod sensitivity (as quantified by a literature review) and the same ecological/environmental predictor variables as were tested against germination photoperiod sensitivity. There were no significant relationships between photoperiod sensitivity in germination or flowering and species' biogeography, phylogeny or other functional traits. Our findings suggest that photoperiod sensitivity is likely to be important in a range of different locations and in different types of species.
在光周期敏感植物中,物候事件的时间主要取决于日照长度,而非温度、降水或其他环境变量。这可能使这些光周期敏感物种对气候变化的响应能力较弱,因为它们的物候受日照长度条件的控制更为严格(日照长度在未来保持不变),而非受不断变化的气候条件控制。我们在三种光照处理(短日照、长日照以及等光暗周期)下测量了种子萌发情况,以量化物种的萌发光周期敏感性。我们开发了一种新的指标,该指标能对一系列地点、栖息地和生长形式的67种植物的萌发光周期敏感性进行连续测量。在这67个物种中,有4个物种在长日照处理下种子萌发显著更多,3个物种在短日照处理下萌发率显著更高,还有4个物种在中间日照处理下萌发率显著更高。然后,我们使用这个指标来量化萌发光周期敏感性(通过实验室测试和计算得出的指标进行量化)与系统发育、种子大小、生长形式、纬度、叶面积指数(LAI)和生态系统类型之间的关系。我们还量化了开花光周期敏感性(通过文献综述进行量化)与和针对萌发光周期敏感性所测试的相同生态/环境预测变量之间的关系。在种子萌发或开花的光周期敏感性与物种的生物地理学、系统发育或其他功能性状之间没有显著关系。我们的研究结果表明,光周期敏感性在一系列不同地点和不同类型的物种中可能都很重要。