Christiansen Sandy, Garcia Rosa, Jimenez Daniel A, Rakshe Shauna
Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
University of Florida, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Aug 20;4(3):100631. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100631. eCollection 2025 Sep.
An unprecedented volume of interventional procedures has entered the pain medicine market, including many "advanced" interventional pain procedures. Given the rapid influx, there is concern that there is discordance between what is taught in pain medicine fellowship programs and done in post-graduate practice.
The goal of the study was to compare sales volumes of advanced procedure devices in academic versus non-academic practice settings to better understand the status quo of procedural practice patterns. This information will be critical to establish a baseline understanding of where advanced pain procedures are happening for future comparison.
This cross-sectional observational study examines relative percentages of industry-reported device sales to academic versus non-academic practices from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in predefined regions of the United States. The data were tabulated and reported as means with corresponding ranges.
Six companies, representing nine distinct interventional pain procedures, certified the requested data. The region with the lowest relative mean device sales at academic institutions was the West (10 %) and the highest was the Northeast (22 %). The procedure with the lowest relative mean sales at academic institutions was dorsal root ganglion stimulation (4 %) and the highest was vertebral body cooled radiofrequency for bone tumors (30 %).
This study highlights the difference between the relative percentage sales of advanced procedure devices in non-academic versus academic institutions, favoring non-academic sites of service. Yet, for each reported pain procedure, there were device sales in academic settings for almost all regions. It will be essential to continue to monitor how academic procedural training compares to post-graduate practice realities to tailor future educational offerings.
大量前所未有的介入性手术已进入疼痛医学市场,包括许多“先进的”介入性疼痛手术。鉴于这种快速涌入的情况,人们担心疼痛医学进修项目所教授的内容与研究生毕业后的实际操作之间存在不一致。
本研究的目的是比较学术实践环境与非学术实践环境中先进手术设备的销售量,以更好地了解手术实践模式的现状。这些信息对于建立对先进疼痛手术实施地点的基线理解以便未来进行比较至关重要。
这项横断面观察性研究考察了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间美国预定义区域内行业报告的设备销售给学术实践与非学术实践的相对百分比。数据被制成表格并以均值及相应范围的形式报告。
代表九种不同介入性疼痛手术的六家公司提供了所要求的数据。学术机构中设备销售相对均值最低的地区是西部(10%),最高的是东北部(22%)。学术机构中销售相对均值最低的手术是背根神经节刺激术(4%),最高的是骨肿瘤椎体冷却射频术(30%)。
本研究突出了非学术机构与学术机构在先进手术设备销售相对百分比上的差异,非学术服务地点占优。然而,对于每种报告的疼痛手术,几乎所有地区的学术环境中都有设备销售。持续监测学术程序培训与研究生毕业后的实践现实之间的比较情况对于调整未来的教育课程至关重要。