Kim Hakyoung, Kim Hyeon Jin, Han Woo Yeon, Yon Dong Keon
Center for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, 23 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
Department of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05190-3.
We presented the interim results (6 months) of the trial on the safety and efficacy of poly-L-lactic acid filler (PLLA; Gana V) injection for the correction of nasolabial fold (NLF); however, no long-term follow-up trials through 24 months have been conducted on this topic.
We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Gana V, a new PLLA filler, over 24 months for NLF correction compared with Sculptra, a well-established PLLA filler.
This double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority, and split-face controlled trial was conducted in France. After the injection of both Gana V and Sculptra on each side of the participants' NLFs, blinded investigators assessed the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade as the primary outcome at each subsequent visit, up to 24 months. The final report on this trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT05215054).
A total of 55 participants with moderate-to-severe NLFs, aged 34 to 70 years (mean age: 53.8 [8.7] years; 87.3% female), were enrolled in the trial. After 24 months, Gana V significantly improved the mean WSRS score (adjusted mean difference [aMD], -0.21; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.02) in the intention-to-treat analysis, while Sculptra did not show significant improvement (aMD -0.12; 95% CI, -0.28 to 0.05). The outcomes aligned with the 6-month results reported in previous study (aMD, -0.25; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.01), which supported the sustained efficacy of Gana V over an extended follow-up period. Non-inferiority of Gana V was established as the adjusted mean difference in change between the two treatment groups ranged from -0.25 to 0.10, with the upper bound below the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.5 (non-inferiority p<0.001). Both treatment groups exhibited similar adverse reaction profiles. Similar results were observed in the per-protocol analysis.
Through the final report of the trial, Gana V was non-inferior to Sculptra with respect to the NLF correction and safety profile. Gana V demonstrated its long-term efficacy through 24 months.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
我们公布了聚左旋乳酸填充剂(PLLA;Gana V)注射用于矫正鼻唇沟(NLF)的安全性和有效性试验的中期结果(6个月);然而,尚未针对该主题进行过长达24个月的长期随访试验。
我们旨在评估新型PLLA填充剂Gana V与成熟的PLLA填充剂Sculptra相比,在24个月内矫正NLF的安全性和有效性。
这项双盲、随机、非劣效性、半脸对照试验在法国进行。在参与者的鼻唇沟两侧分别注射Gana V和Sculptra后,盲法研究者在每次后续随访时评估皱纹严重程度评分量表(WSRS)等级作为主要结局,随访时间长达24个月。该试验的最终报告已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(编号NCT05215054)。
共有55名年龄在34至
70岁(平均年龄:53.8 [8.7]岁;87.3%为女性)的中重度鼻唇沟患者纳入试验。24个月后,在意向性分析中,Gana V显著改善了平均WSRS评分(调整后平均差值[aMD]为-0.21;95%置信区间为-0.41至-0.02),而Sculptra未显示出显著改善(aMD为-0.12;95%置信区间为-0.28至0.05)。这些结果与先前研究报告的6个月结果一致(aMD为-0.25;95%置信区间为-0.49至-0.01),支持了Gana V在延长随访期内的持续有效性。Gana V的非劣效性得以确立,因为两个治疗组之间变化的调整后平均差值在-0.25至0.10之间,上限低于预先定义的非劣效性界值0.5(非劣效性p<0.001)。两个治疗组的不良反应情况相似。在符合方案分析中也观察到了类似结果。
通过该试验的最终报告,在矫正鼻唇沟和安全性方面,Gana V不劣于Sculptra。Gana V在24个月内证明了其长期有效性。
证据水平I:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。