He Zhicheng, Lv Yongqiang, Qin Xiaochen, Han Chengming, Wang Xiaolong, Wang Ping, Luo Jun, Loor Juan J, Li Cong
College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Mammalian NutriPhysioGenomics, Department of Animal Sciences and Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf309.
The shapes of lactation curves are affected by genetic and environmental factors, and flexible models are required to fit such curves. This study aimed to compare the effects of the Gaussian process regression model (Gaussian model) for fitting lactation curves of Saanen dairy goats versus the parametric Wood's model. In addition, we investigated the effects of environmental factors on the shape of lactation curves. Principal component analysis (PCA) detected 3 (541 lactations fitted using the Wood's model [WDS]), 5 (raw data from the WDS fitted using the Gaussian model [GWDS]), and 6 (1,032 lactation datasets fitted using the Gaussian model [GDS]) principal components (PCs). The interpretation of PC1 and PC2 in the 3 datasets was consistent, with PC1 accounting for total milk production, PC2 accounting for persistency (reflecting the difference between early and late lactation), PC3 accounting for milk yield in early lactation (WDS) and relative milk yield in mid-lactation (GWDS and GDS), and PC4 to 6 being associated with fluctuations throughout lactation. The lactation curves of 3 datasets were clustered into 2 (WDS), 2 (GWDS), and 3 (GDS) clusters based on their PC scores, and mainly differed in total milk production and persistency. The total milk production increased from the first to the third parities, but the mid-term relative milk production was highest in first-parity goats. Compared with kidding in spring, kidding in winter led to higher total milk production and persistency, and lower mid-term relative milk production. Low persistency was detected when the number of kids was ≥2. The Gaussian model is suitable for fitting daily milk yield records, with the main sources of variance in the lactation curves of Saanen goats in China being total milk yield and persistency.
泌乳曲线的形状受遗传和环境因素影响,需要灵活的模型来拟合此类曲线。本研究旨在比较高斯过程回归模型(高斯模型)与参数化伍德模型对萨能奶山羊泌乳曲线的拟合效果。此外,我们还研究了环境因素对泌乳曲线形状的影响。主成分分析(PCA)检测到3个主成分(使用伍德模型[WDS]拟合的541次泌乳)、5个主成分(使用高斯模型[GWDS]拟合WDS的原始数据)和6个主成分(使用高斯模型[GDS]拟合的1032个泌乳数据集)。3个数据集中PC1和PC2的解释是一致的,PC1代表总产奶量,PC2代表持久性(反映泌乳早期和晚期的差异),PC3代表泌乳早期的产奶量(WDS)和泌乳中期的相对产奶量(GWDS和GDS),PC4至6与整个泌乳期的波动有关。根据其PC得分,3个数据集的泌乳曲线被聚类为2个(WDS)、2个(GWDS)和3个(GDS)聚类,主要在总产奶量和持久性方面存在差异。总产奶量从第一胎到第三胎增加,但第一胎山羊的中期相对产奶量最高。与春季产羔相比,冬季产羔导致总产奶量和持久性更高,中期相对产奶量更低。当产羔数≥2时,检测到持久性较低。高斯模型适用于拟合日产奶量记录,中国萨能山羊泌乳曲线的主要变异来源是总产奶量和持久性。