• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19患者的经皮气管切开术:一项回顾性队列研究。

Percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Viana Sofia Wagemaker, Feres Brenda, Roberto Gabriel, Sardenberg Rodrigo

机构信息

Physician. Kursk State Medical University (KSMU), Kursk, Russia.

Physician. Center for Advanced Research at Union of Great Lakes University, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Aug 29;143(4):e2024036. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0036.R2.07032025. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0036.R2.07032025
PMID:40900549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12401476/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed unprecedented strain on healthcare systems, particularly on critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV). Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) has emerged as a potential strategy to facilitate weaning, reduce intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and optimize resource use. However, the timing, safety, and outcomes of PT in COVID-19 patients remain debatable.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the technical aspects of the procedure and evaluate the early safety of our technique to healthcare professionals, as well as the short-term factors affecting survival in 103 consecutive patients after tracheostomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with COVID-19 who underwent PT between March 2020 and June 2020 at Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo. The factors considered for analysis included age, sex, timing of tracheostomy, proportion of affected lungs, comorbidities, fraction of inspired oxygen on MV, and availability of professional private equipment. Univariate analysis was performed for screening, and variables with P < 0.20 were included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Most patients were male, with a median age of 68 years. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (n = 55/52%), diabetes (n = 37/36%), and heart disease (n = 24/21%). Patients over 60 years old had reduced survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.35; P = 0.003), and those who underwent high nasal flow catheter (HR = 0.49; P = 0.02) and PT earlier (< 10 days) had better survival (HR = 0.37; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Early PT in selected patients may reduce the duration of MV and lead to shorter ICU stays. The health system is overloaded by the scarcity of ventilators and beds for critically ill patients.

摘要

背景

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给医疗系统带来了前所未有的压力,尤其是对需要长时间机械通气(MV)的重症患者。经皮气管切开术(PT)已成为促进撤机、缩短重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和优化资源利用的一种潜在策略。然而,COVID-19患者PT的时机、安全性和结果仍存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在描述该手术的技术方面,并评估我们的技术对医护人员的早期安全性,以及气管切开术后103例连续患者生存的短期影响因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2020年3月至2020年6月在圣保罗奥斯瓦尔多·克鲁兹阿莱芒医院接受PT的COVID-19患者。分析考虑的因素包括年龄、性别、气管切开术时机、患侧肺比例、合并症、MV时的吸入氧分数以及专业私人设备的可用性。进行单因素分析进行筛选,P<0.20的变量纳入多因素Cox比例风险回归模型。

结果

大多数患者为男性,中位年龄68岁。最常见的合并症为高血压(n=55/52%)、糖尿病(n=37/36%)和心脏病(n=24/21%)。60岁以上患者生存率降低(风险比[HR]=3.35;P=0.003),接受高流量鼻导管治疗(HR=0.49;P=0.02)和更早(<10天)进行PT的患者生存率更高(HR=0.37;P=0.04)。

结论

对选定患者尽早进行PT可能会缩短MV持续时间并缩短ICU住院时间。呼吸机和重症患者床位的短缺使卫生系统不堪重负。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/baa6f577c658/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/8d2e31a353f7/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/0635dc4ac989/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/33c532c6398b/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/baa6f577c658/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/8d2e31a353f7/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/0635dc4ac989/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/33c532c6398b/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3f6/12401476/baa6f577c658/1806-9460-spmj-143-04-e2024036-gf04.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study.COVID-19患者的经皮气管切开术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Aug 29;143(4):e2024036. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024.0036.R2.07032025. eCollection 2025.
2
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者的早期与晚期气管切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.
3
Early versus late tracheostomy in people with multiple trauma.多发伤患者早期与晚期气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD015932. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015932.pub2.
4
High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen for Weaning Mechanically Ventilated Tracheostomized Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study.高流量气管给氧用于机械通气的气管切开危重症患者撤机:一项回顾性研究
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Sep;69(8):e70104. doi: 10.1111/aas.70104.
5
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients.在危重症成年患者中,喉罩气道与气管内导管用于经皮扩张气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 30;2014(6):CD009901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009901.pub2.
6
Automated weaning and SBT systems versus non-automated weaning strategies for weaning time in invasively ventilated critically ill adults.针对有创通气的危重症成年患者,比较自动撤机和自主呼吸试验(SBT)系统与非自动撤机策略对撤机时间的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD008638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008638.pub2.
7
Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children.自动化与非自动化撤机对缩短危重症成人和儿童机械通气时间的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 18;7(7):CD009235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009235.pub4.
8
Tracheostomy in COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study of outcomes and mortality predictors in a specialized infectious disease hospital in Brazil.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的气管切开术:巴西一家专业传染病医院的结局及死亡预测因素回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0326531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326531. eCollection 2025.
9
Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children.采用自动化与非自动化撤机方式以缩短危重症成人和儿童机械通气时间
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD009235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009235.pub3.
10
Cough augmentation techniques for extubation or weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation.用于机械通气的危重症患者拔管或撤机的咳嗽增强技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 11;1(1):CD011833. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011833.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of early versus late tracheostomy on patient outcomes in a tertiary care multispeciality ICU.三级综合多专科重症监护病房中早期与晚期气管切开术对患者预后的影响。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul-Sep;37(3):458-463. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_229_18. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
POINT: Tracheostomy in Patients With COVID-19: Should We Do It Before 14 Days? Yes.观点:新冠病毒肺炎患者的气管切开术:我们应该在14天之前进行吗?应该。
Chest. 2021 May;159(5):1723-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.074. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
Update on management of tracheostomy.
气管切开术管理的最新进展。
BJA Educ. 2019 Nov;19(11):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
4
Tracheostomy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 reduces time on mechanical ventilation but not intensive care unit stay.COVID-19 患者行气管切开术可缩短机械通气时间,但不能减少 ICU 住院时间。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(2):102867. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102867. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Association of Tracheostomy with Changes in Sedation during COVID-19: A Quality Improvement Evaluation at the University of Michigan.气管切开术与新型冠状病毒肺炎期间镇静变化的关联:密歇根大学的质量改进评估
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):907-909. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1096RL.
6
Evaluation of the Incidence and Potential Mechanisms of Tracheal Complications in Patients With COVID-19.评估 COVID-19 患者中气管并发症的发生率和潜在机制。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1):70-76. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.4148.
7
Use of Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: American College of Chest Physicians/American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology/Association of Interventional Pulmonology Program Directors Expert Panel Report.COVID-19 大流行期间的气管切开术使用:美国胸科医师学会/美国支气管镜和介入肺脏病学会/介入肺脏病学项目主任协会专家小组报告。
Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1499-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.571. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
8
Indications and timing for tracheostomy in patients with SARS CoV2-related.新型冠状病毒相关的气管切开术的适应证和时机。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2403-2404. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06068-7. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
Global Tracheostomy Collaborative: data-driven improvements in patient safety through multidisciplinary teamwork, standardisation, education, and patient partnership.全球气管造口术协作组织:通过多学科团队合作、标准化、教育和患者合作,以数据为导向提高患者安全性。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e104-e118. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.054. Epub 2020 May 23.
10
Tracheostomy in the COVID-19 era: global and multidisciplinary guidance.COVID-19 时代的气管切开术:全球和多学科指南。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jul;8(7):717-725. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30230-7. Epub 2020 May 15.