• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮普金Ⅲ型骨折:文献综述及切开复位内固定术与关节成形术的比较观点

Pipkin type III fractures: a narrative review of literature and comparative opinion on ORIF vs. arthroplasty.

作者信息

Shakya Sujan, Zhang Qing, Wen Yi, Wen Xinag, Cheng Long

机构信息

West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 Aug 18;12:1554603. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1554603. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1554603
PMID:40901013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12399708/
Abstract

Pipkin Type III is extremely rare and is associated with worse prognosis and several complications. There is still no consensus on the management of injuries and whether these fractures should be treated surgically with ORIF or arthroplasty. Pipkin type III involves a combination of ipsilateral femoral head and neck fractures. Physioanatomical complexity of this fracture is often challenging, with a poorer prognosis than any other subgroups. The most common complications after management of Pipkin Type III are avascular necrosis of the femoral head and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The treatment modality with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) varies according to the severity of the fracture, patient age, time to surgery, and intraoperative findings. Reoperation and surgical intervention pose significant economic burden, functional impairment, and quality of life. This comprehensive review on Pipkin type III demonstrates a throughout exploration of the existing research publications and case studies, focusing on current understanding treatment management strategies, outcome associated and decision-making frameworks with algorithms for decision schemes. By incorporating additional references of our institutional experiences, it aims to expand the current body of knowledge on Pipkin III fractures, offering fresh perspectives and crucial insights for surgeons in decision-making processes.

摘要

皮普金Ⅲ型极为罕见,预后较差且伴有多种并发症。对于此类损伤的处理以及这些骨折是否应采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)或关节置换术进行手术治疗,目前仍未达成共识。皮普金Ⅲ型涉及同侧股骨头和颈骨折的组合。这种骨折的生理解剖复杂性通常具有挑战性,预后比其他任何亚组都要差。皮普金Ⅲ型处理后最常见的并发症是股骨头缺血性坏死和创伤后骨关节炎。切开复位内固定术(ORIF)或全髋关节置换术(THA)的治疗方式会根据骨折的严重程度、患者年龄、手术时间以及术中发现而有所不同。再次手术和外科干预会带来巨大的经济负担、功能损害和生活质量问题。这篇关于皮普金Ⅲ型的综述全面探讨了现有研究出版物和病例研究,重点关注当前对治疗管理策略、相关结果以及带有决策方案算法的决策框架的理解。通过纳入我们机构经验的更多参考文献,旨在扩展当前关于皮普金Ⅲ型骨折的知识体系,为外科医生在决策过程中提供新的视角和关键见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/cfb04ca4e62a/fsurg-12-1554603-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/591c07f1aaf1/fsurg-12-1554603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/82c859587093/fsurg-12-1554603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/4470555a1645/fsurg-12-1554603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/5a2fbf9ce099/fsurg-12-1554603-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/bf691d7e570c/fsurg-12-1554603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/cfb04ca4e62a/fsurg-12-1554603-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/591c07f1aaf1/fsurg-12-1554603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/82c859587093/fsurg-12-1554603-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/4470555a1645/fsurg-12-1554603-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/5a2fbf9ce099/fsurg-12-1554603-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/bf691d7e570c/fsurg-12-1554603-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e86/12399708/cfb04ca4e62a/fsurg-12-1554603-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Pipkin type III fractures: a narrative review of literature and comparative opinion on ORIF vs. arthroplasty.皮普金Ⅲ型骨折:文献综述及切开复位内固定术与关节成形术的比较观点
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 18;12:1554603. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1554603. eCollection 2025.
2
Elbow Fractures Overview肘部骨折概述
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?在病理性股骨转子下骨折的治疗中,哪些因素与植入物翻修相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):473-484. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003291. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
5
What Is the Cumulative Incidence of Femoral Stem Revision and Stem Complication in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease?对于股骨近端转移性骨病,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修及柄并发症的累积发生率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003541.
6
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures.胫骨平台骨折的手术固定方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 15;2015(9):CD009679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009679.pub2.
9
Arthroscopically Assisted Versus Standard Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Techniques for the Acute Ankle Fracture.关节镜辅助与标准切开复位内固定技术治疗急性踝关节骨折的比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):554-62. doi: 10.1177/1071100715620455. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Pipkin fractures: fracture type-specific management.皮普金骨折:特定骨折类型的治疗
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Oct;144(10):4601-4614. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05576-z. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Case Report of a Delayed Rare Pipkin Type III Fracture in Adult Male Patient.成年男性患者延迟性罕见 Pipkin III 型骨折病例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Aug;14(8):16-19. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i08.4630.
3
Femoral Head Fractures: Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes.股骨颈骨折:评估、治疗和结局。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Oct 15;32(20):929-937. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01121. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
4
Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of a Pipkin Type-I Femoral Head Fracture.关节镜下复位及固定 Pipkin I 型股骨头骨折
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 May 21;14(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00073. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
5
Techniques and results of reconstruction of femoral head fractures: An Update.股骨头骨折重建的技术与结果:最新进展
Injury. 2024 Jun;55(6):111473. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111473. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
6
Pipkin type III femoral head fracture: which treatment strategy can be recommended?皮普金 III 型股骨头骨折:推荐哪种治疗策略?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Jun 16;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00701-x.
7
Pipkin Type I and II femoral head fractures: internal fixation or excision?-from the hip arthroscopy perspective.皮普金I型和II型股骨头骨折:内固定还是切除术?——从髋关节镜的角度来看
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2023 Feb 23;10(1):31-36. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnad002. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Management and outcome of patients with femoral head fractures: the mid-term follow-up with injuries and associated prognostic factors.股骨颈骨折患者的管理和预后:损伤及相关预后因素的中期随访。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 20;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06317-w.
9
A Scoping Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Survival and Reoperation Rates in Patients of 55 Years or Younger: Health Services Implications for Revision Surgeries.55岁及以下患者全髋关节置换术生存率和再次手术率的范围综述:翻修手术对卫生服务的影响
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jul 19;16:247-258.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.05.012. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head-Overview and Current State of the Art.股骨头缺血性坏死概述及现状。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 15;19(12):7348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127348.