Marco Catherine A, Wang Grace, Schaefer-Hood Gavin, Turner Matthew, Egner Matthew, Haynos Alexander, Soderman Caroline
Emergency Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Emergency Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 2;17(8):e89240. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89240. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Introduction Hypertension is a significant global health issue. It is estimated that approximately half of adults in the United States have hypertension (approximately 119 million adults). Although emergent treatment is not indicated for asymptomatic hypertension, patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hypertension may represent an opportunity for patient education and improved health outcomes. This study was undertaken to identify healthcare outcomes associated with an educational intervention for patients presenting to the ED with hypertension. Methods In this prospective interventional study, subjects included consenting adult Emergency Department (ED) patients with hypertension (defined by the International Society of Hypertension as systolic blood pressure (BP) over 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP over 90 mm Hg), who were discharged home. Baseline assessment of medication adherence, exercise, diet, tobacco, and alcohol use was performed. An educational intervention was provided using the American Heart Association: Blood Pressure Fact Sheets. Subjects were contacted at two and four weeks following the ED visit to assess BP, medication adherence, exercise, diet, and tobacco and alcohol use. Results Among 151 participants, data were available at two weeks for 89 subjects (59% follow-up rate). Following the educational intervention, participants had lower systolic BP at two weeks (baseline mean: 163 mm Hg (95% CI: 159-166), two-week mean: 130 mm Hg (95% CI: 126-135); p < 0.001) and diastolic BP at two weeks (baseline mean: 93 (95% CI: 91-95); two-week mean: 77 mmHg (95% CI: 75-80); p < 0.001). Participants were more likely to take antihypertensive medication daily at two weeks (baseline: 52%; two-week mean: 69%; p = 0.0271). There was no significant difference in self-reported healthy diet (baseline: 21%; two-week mean: 26%; p = 0.1). There was no significant difference in self-reported exercise (baseline: 30%; two-week mean: 26%; p = 0.8). There were no differences in smoking or alcohol use at two weeks. Similar results were found at four weeks. Data were available at four weeks post intervention for 88 subjects (58.2% follow-up rate). At four weeks, participants had a lower systolic BP (baseline: 163 mmHg (95% CI: 159-166); four-week mean: 132; p < 0.001) and lower diastolic BP (baseline: 93 mmHg (95% CI: 91-95); four-week mean: 78; p < 0.001). A significant difference in self-reported exercise emerged at four weeks, with a lower percentage reporting no exercise (baseline reporting no exercise: 30%; four-week mean: 18%, p = 0.0348). There were no significant differences in reported healthy diet adherence (baseline: 21%; four-week mean: 24%; p = 0.6705), smoking (baseline: 11.92%; four-week mean: 5.68%; p = 0.1147), or alcohol use (baseline: 34%; four-week mean: 28%; p = 0.3361). Conclusions An educational intervention in the ED was associated with lower systolic and diastolic BP at two and four weeks post ED visit, improved medication adherence at two and four weeks, and self-reported exercise at four weeks. There were no differences in reported healthy diet adherence, exercise, smoking, or alcohol use.
引言
高血压是一个重大的全球健康问题。据估计,美国约有一半成年人患有高血压(约1.19亿成年人)。虽然无症状高血压无需紧急治疗,但到急诊科(ED)就诊的高血压患者可能是进行患者教育和改善健康结局的契机。本研究旨在确定对到ED就诊的高血压患者进行教育干预所带来的医疗保健结局。
方法
在这项前瞻性干预研究中,研究对象包括同意参与研究的成年急诊科高血压患者(根据国际高血压学会定义,收缩压(BP)超过140 mmHg和/或舒张压超过90 mmHg),这些患者被送回家中。对药物依从性、运动、饮食、烟草和酒精使用情况进行了基线评估。使用美国心脏协会的《血压情况说明书》进行教育干预。在ED就诊后的两周和四周对研究对象进行联系,以评估血压、药物依从性、运动、饮食以及烟草和酒精使用情况。
结果
在151名参与者中,89名受试者(随访率59%)在两周时有可用数据。经过教育干预后,参与者在两周时收缩压较低(基线均值:163 mmHg(95% CI:159 - 166),两周均值:130 mmHg(95% CI:126 - 135);p < 0.001),舒张压在两周时也较低(基线均值:93(95% CI:91 - 95);两周均值:77 mmHg(95% CI:75 - 80);p < 0.001)。参与者在两周时更有可能每天服用抗高血压药物(基线:52%;两周均值:69%;p = 0.0271)。自我报告的健康饮食方面无显著差异(基线:21%;两周均值:26%;p = 0.1)。自我报告的运动方面无显著差异(基线:30%;两周均值:26%;p = 0.8)。两周时吸烟或饮酒情况无差异。在四周时发现了类似结果。干预后四周有88名受试者(随访率58.2%)有可用数据。在四周时,参与者收缩压较低(基线:163 mmHg(95% CI:159 - 166);四周均值:132;p < 0.001),舒张压较低(基线:93 mmHg(95% CI:91 - 95);四周均值:78;p < 0.001)。在四周时自我报告的运动出现显著差异,报告不运动的百分比降低(基线报告不运动:30%;四周均值:18%,p = 0.0348)。在报告的健康饮食依从性(基线:21%;四周均值:24%;p = 0.6705)、吸烟(基线:11.92%;四周均值:5.68%;p = 0.1147)或饮酒(基线:34%;四周均值:28%;p = 0.3361)方面无显著差异。
结论
在ED进行的教育干预与ED就诊后两周和四周时收缩压和舒张压降低、两周和四周时药物依从性改善以及四周时自我报告的运动改善相关。在报告的健康饮食依从性、运动、吸烟或饮酒方面无差异。