• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导航下微创颈椎及颈胸段固定:手术技术及拟议分类的技术说明

Navigated Minimally Invasive Cervical and Cervicothoracic Fixation: A Technical Note on Surgical Technique and Proposed Classification.

作者信息

Komaitis Spyridon, Zygogiannis Konstantinos, Karatzoglou Sotirios, Klitsinikos Dimitrios, Pasku Dritan, Salem Khalid

机构信息

Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Sep 1;17(9):e91414. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91414. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.91414
PMID:40901277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12401166/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose a standardized classification of minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw (MICEPS) fixation according to the levels instrumented and the extent of the construct, thereby facilitating reproducible surgical planning and technique. We developed a three-tiered MICEPS classification with a specific surgical algorithm based on anatomic levels and construct length: Type 1, subaxial cervical fixation; Type 2, subaxial cervical to proximal thoracic fixation; and Type 3, subaxial cervical to T3/4 cervicothoracic stabilization. All techniques employ O-arm intraoperative navigation and preserve posterior tension-band integrity. We describe key technical steps and compare each type in terms of incision strategy, soft-tissue handling, and navigation workflow. Each MICEPS type employs a tailored combination of small paramedian incisions, muscle-sparing dissection, and intraoperative navigation to achieve stable posterior fixation while minimizing soft-tissue trauma: Type 1 is indicated for short subaxial cervical fusions (typically C3-C6/C7). It uses a single small paramedian incision on each side of the spine and follows a purely muscle-sparing corridor. Type 2 extends the construct to T1 or T2, still via one paramedian incision per side, but involves splitting and subsequent re-approximation of the trapezius muscle. Type 3 reaches down to T3/T4, employing two mini-open incisions on each side and controlled splitting of the trapezius. All three techniques provide a safe, anatomically direct corridor without the need for significant retraction that could compromise navigation accuracy. The provided MICEPS classification offers a clear, anatomically driven framework for minimally invasive posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fixation. By tailoring incision number, muscle-sparing corridors, and navigated instrumentation to the required fusion extent, surgeons can achieve high-precision screw placement, minimal morbidity, expedited recovery, and high repeatability. Although a formal learning curve exists, MICEPS represents a safe, cost-effective alternative to open techniques in appropriately selected patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是根据固定节段和内固定范围,提出一种微创颈椎椎弓根螺钉(MICEPS)固定的标准化分类方法,从而促进可重复的手术规划和技术应用。我们基于解剖节段和内固定长度,开发了一种具有特定手术算法的三级MICEPS分类:1型,下颈椎固定;2型,下颈椎至胸近端固定;3型,下颈椎至T3/4颈胸段稳定。所有技术均采用O型臂术中导航,并保留后张力带的完整性。我们描述了关键技术步骤,并在切口策略、软组织处理和导航工作流程方面对每种类型进行了比较。每种MICEPS类型都采用了小的旁正中切口、保留肌肉的解剖和术中导航的定制组合,以实现稳定的后路固定,同时将软组织创伤降至最低:1型适用于下颈椎短节段融合(通常为C3 - C6/C7)。它在脊柱两侧各使用一个小的旁正中切口,并遵循纯粹的保留肌肉通道。2型将内固定范围扩展至T1或T2,仍然是每侧一个旁正中切口,但涉及斜方肌的劈开和随后的重新缝合。3型延伸至T3/T4,每侧采用两个迷你开放切口,并对斜方肌进行可控劈开。所有这三种技术都提供了一条安全、解剖学上直接的通道,无需进行可能影响导航准确性的大量牵拉。所提供的MICEPS分类为微创颈椎后路和颈胸段固定提供了一个清晰的、基于解剖学的框架。通过根据所需融合范围调整切口数量、保留肌肉通道和导航器械,外科医生可以实现高精度的螺钉置入、最小的发病率、加快恢复和高重复性。尽管存在正式的学习曲线,但在适当选择的患者中,MICEPS是开放技术的一种安全、经济有效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/37701e0cf271/cureus-0017-00000091414-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/4e7a70030ce1/cureus-0017-00000091414-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/596a4e9c84ff/cureus-0017-00000091414-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/055a724705b6/cureus-0017-00000091414-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/0b8402ef9c7b/cureus-0017-00000091414-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/7c00c272d0bc/cureus-0017-00000091414-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/21e77a861dba/cureus-0017-00000091414-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/f465217e4011/cureus-0017-00000091414-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/6182fa12c5eb/cureus-0017-00000091414-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/ddd5a7bbbf40/cureus-0017-00000091414-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/97ce406b5708/cureus-0017-00000091414-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/ebaa3b70d459/cureus-0017-00000091414-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/42c6342a4a8e/cureus-0017-00000091414-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/37701e0cf271/cureus-0017-00000091414-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/4e7a70030ce1/cureus-0017-00000091414-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/596a4e9c84ff/cureus-0017-00000091414-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/055a724705b6/cureus-0017-00000091414-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/0b8402ef9c7b/cureus-0017-00000091414-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/7c00c272d0bc/cureus-0017-00000091414-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/21e77a861dba/cureus-0017-00000091414-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/f465217e4011/cureus-0017-00000091414-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/6182fa12c5eb/cureus-0017-00000091414-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/ddd5a7bbbf40/cureus-0017-00000091414-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/97ce406b5708/cureus-0017-00000091414-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/ebaa3b70d459/cureus-0017-00000091414-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/42c6342a4a8e/cureus-0017-00000091414-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c60a/12401166/37701e0cf271/cureus-0017-00000091414-i13.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigated Minimally Invasive Cervical and Cervicothoracic Fixation: A Technical Note on Surgical Technique and Proposed Classification.导航下微创颈椎及颈胸段固定:手术技术及拟议分类的技术说明
Cureus. 2025 Sep 1;17(9):e91414. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91414. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
How to Apply the Sequential Correction Technique to Treatment of Congenital Cervicothoracic Scoliosis: A Technical Note and Case Series.如何将序贯矫正技术应用于先天性颈胸段脊柱侧凸的治疗:技术说明与病例系列
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):2159-2172. doi: 10.1111/os.70052. Epub 2025 May 19.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Maintenance of construct integrity with subaxial cervical pedicle screws when crossing the cervicothoracic junction in complex pediatric deformity: an international multicenter study.复杂小儿脊柱畸形中跨越颈胸交界区时使用颈椎椎弓根螺钉维持内固定完整性:一项国际多中心研究
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Mar 22;41(1):138. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06791-8.
5
Elbow Fractures Overview肘部骨折概述
6
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
7
Maximizing screw length in expandable lateral lumbar interbody spacers with integrated fixation may obviate the need for supplemental pedicle screws.在具有一体化固定功能的可扩张性腰椎椎间融合器中最大化螺钉长度,可能无需额外使用椎弓根螺钉。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1564-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.035. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
8
Single-Incision Broström-Gould Surgery with Peroneal Debridement and Calcaneal Osteotomy.单切口 Broström-Gould 手术联合腓骨清创及跟骨截骨术
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jul 17;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00017. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
9
Pedicle screw fixation for traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine.胸腰椎创伤性骨折的椎弓根螺钉固定术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD009073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009073.pub2.
10
Screw-related complications in the subaxial cervical spine with the use of lateral mass versus cervical pedicle screws: a systematic review.侧块螺钉与颈椎椎弓根螺钉在下颈椎应用中的螺钉相关并发症:系统评价。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):614-23. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13136. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes and Patient Perspectives in Full Endoscopic Cervical Surgery: A Systematic Review.全内镜下颈椎手术的临床结果与患者观点:一项系统评价
Neurospine. 2025 Mar;22(1):81-104. doi: 10.14245/ns.2449086.534. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Comparison of RVU Reimbursement in Anterior or Posterior Approach for Single- and Multilevel Cervical Spinal Fusion.单节段和多节段颈椎融合术前路或后路手术的相对价值单位报销比较
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Apr 1;38(3):E141-E144. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001684. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Clinical Implementation of Tissue-Sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion: Addressing Market Access Challenges.
保留组织的后路颈椎融合术的临床应用:应对市场准入挑战。
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 7;14(8):837. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080837.
4
Our C-Arm-Free Minimally Invasive Technique for Spinal Surgery: The Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spine-Based on Our Experiences.我们的无 C 臂微创脊柱手术技术:胸腰椎和腰椎——基于我们的经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 4;59(12):2116. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122116.
5
A C-Arm-Free Minimally Invasive Technique for Spinal Surgery: Cervical and Thoracic Spine.无 C 臂微创脊柱手术技术:颈椎和胸椎。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 6;59(10):1779. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101779.
6
Minimally Invasive C1-3 Posterior Spinal Fusion With Intraoperative O-arm Navigation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.术中O型臂导航辅助下的微创C1-3后路脊柱融合术:二维手术视频
Oper Neurosurg. 2023 Jul 1;25(1):e50. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000712. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
7
Clinical efficacy and safety of posterior minimally invasive surgery in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review.后路微创术治疗颈椎病的临床疗效及安全性的系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 13;17(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03274-3.
8
ACDF and posterior spinal fusion revision for posterior nonunion with deformity, myelopathy, and osteoporosis in an 87-year-old: A case report and literature review.87岁患者因后路骨不连伴畸形、脊髓病和骨质疏松行前路颈椎间盘切除融合术及后路脊柱融合翻修术:病例报告及文献综述
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Jan;90:106650. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106650. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Minimally invasive cervical pedicle screw fixation via the posterolateral approach for metastatic cervical spinal tumors.经后外侧入路微创颈椎椎弓根螺钉固定治疗颈椎转移性肿瘤
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Nov 27;1(4):218-221. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0025. eCollection 2017.
10
Outcomes of Unstable Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures Managed by Posteroanterior Stabilization and Fusion.经前后路稳定与融合治疗的下颈椎不稳定骨折的疗效
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):416-422. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.416. Epub 2018 Jun 4.