Tollefson Luke V, Kajabi Abdul Wahed, Hedayati Eisa, Knutsen Karsten, Takahashi Takashi, Ellermann Jutta, LaPrade Robert F
Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Sep 3:3635465251366443. doi: 10.1177/03635465251366443.
Meniscal extrusion has been reported to be present in >50% of knees after medial meniscus root repair. Meniscal extrusion has also been reported to be a risk factor for the progression of osteoarthritis and poorer patient-reported outcomes by impairing the ability of the meniscus to absorb hoop stress.
To determine whether the addition of a centralization suture to 2-tunnel transtibial root repair reduces postoperative medial meniscal extrusion in patients with type 2 posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tears.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
This randomized controlled trial was performed between April 2021 and November 2024 for patients with an isolated type 2 PMMR tear. Patients undergoing PMMR repair were randomly selected to undergo transtibial repair with (treatment group) or without (control group) a centralization suture. A power analysis determined that 24 patients were necessary for the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using a high-resolution 7-T scanner. Medial meniscal extrusion was measured on coronal T2-weighted images using 2 vertical lines at the peripheral margins of the medial tibial plateau and the outermost edge of the meniscal body. Statistical analysis was performed using tests, and significance was set at < .05.
A total of 26 patients (21 female, 5 male) were examined; 14 patients were in the centralization group (treatment group, mean age, 50.3 years), and 12 patients were in the control group (no centralization, mean age, 56.1 years). All PMMR repair constructs were found to be intact on MRI postoperatively. Preoperatively, meniscal extrusion averaged 3.81 ± 1.16 mm for the centralization group and 3.31 ± 0.93 mm for the control group ( = .244). Postoperatively, meniscal extrusion averaged 4.61 ± 1.52 mm for the centralization group and 5.02 ± 1.33 mm for the control group ( = .483). In the centralization group, extrusion increased by a mean of 0.81 ± 0.72 mm (21.4% ± 17.7% increase) compared to preoperatively, while the control group experienced a mean increase of 1.71 ± 1.33 mm (59.8% ± 52.6% increase). The increase in extrusion of the centralization group was significantly smaller compared to that of the control group for both the absolute change (in mm; = .026) and percentage change ( = .016). Postoperative extrusion increased in 25 of 26 (96.2%) patients.
Despite surgically successful PMMR repair in all patients, medial meniscal extrusion was increased in 96.2% of patients at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. The addition of a centralization suture in transtibial root repair compared to isolated transtibial root repair resulted in a significantly less increase in postoperative extrusion at 6 months on MRI.
NCT05088525 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
据报道,内侧半月板根部修复术后超过50%的膝关节存在半月板挤压。据报道,半月板挤压也是骨关节炎进展的一个危险因素,并且会通过损害半月板吸收环向应力的能力而导致患者报告的预后较差。
确定在2隧道经胫骨根部修复术中增加一条中心化缝线是否能减少2型后内侧半月板根部(PMMR)撕裂患者术后的内侧半月板挤压。
随机对照试验;证据等级,2级。
本随机对照试验于2021年4月至2024年11月期间对孤立性2型PMMR撕裂患者进行。接受PMMR修复的患者被随机选择接受带(治疗组)或不带(对照组)中心化缝线的经胫骨修复。一项功效分析确定该研究需要24名患者。术前和术后6个月使用高分辨率7-T扫描仪进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。在冠状面T2加权图像上,使用两条垂直线测量内侧胫骨平台周边边缘和半月板体最外缘处的内侧半月板挤压情况。使用检验进行统计分析,显著性设定为P < 0.05。
共检查了26名患者(21名女性,5名男性);14名患者在中心化组(治疗组,平均年龄50.3岁),12名患者在对照组(无中心化,平均年龄56.1岁)。术后MRI显示所有PMMR修复结构均完整。术前,中心化组半月板挤压平均为3.81±1.16 mm,对照组为3.31±0.93 mm(P = 0.244)。术后,中心化组半月板挤压平均为4.61±1.52 mm,对照组为5.02±1.33 mm(P = 0.483)。在中心化组,与术前相比,挤压平均增加0.81±0.72 mm(增加21.4%±17.7%),而对照组平均增加1.71±1.33 mm(增加59.8%±52.6%)。对于绝对变化(以mm为单位;P = 0.026)和百分比变化(P = 0.016),中心化组挤压的增加均显著小于对照组。26名患者中有25名(96.2%)术后挤压增加。
尽管所有患者的PMMR修复手术均成功,但术后6个月时,96.2%的患者内侧半月板挤压较术前增加。与单纯经胫骨根部修复相比,经胫骨根部修复术中增加一条中心化缝线导致术后6个月MRI显示的挤压增加明显较少。
NCT05088525(ClinicalTrials.gov)