• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT在宫颈癌患者评估中的应用:与18F-FDG PET/CT的直接对比

18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the Evaluation of Patients With Cervical Cancers : Head-to-Head Comparison With 18 F-FDG PET/CT.

作者信息

Wei Jinhui, Zou Kun, Sun Fangfang, Feng Qiaochu, Liu Haodong, Zheng Hongna, Guo Yanjie, Li Longjie

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology.

Departments of Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian.

出版信息

Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000006103.

DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000006103
PMID:40902139
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To explore the potential utility of 18 F-AlF-NOTA-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 PET/CT (denoted as 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT) in the evaluation of cervical cancer through a head-to-head comparison with 18 F-FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with a pathologic diagnosis of cervical cancer underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT within a 7-day period. Out of the 22 patients, 19 (median age, 62.3 y) were included in the final analysis. Comparisons were made between the ability of 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT to detect primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes; semiquantitative PET/CT parameters were also analyzed, including SUV max , SUV mean , metabolic tumor volume (MTV for 18 F-FDG) and fibroblast tumor volume (FTV for 18 F-FAPI-04), tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG for 18 F-FDG) and tumor lesion FAPI (TLF for 18 F-FAPI-04), and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR liver and TBR blood ), calculated by dividing the SUV max of the lesion by the SUV mean of normal liver or blood pool.

RESULTS

18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT identified a greater number of primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT detected 19/19 primary tumors, achieving a detection rate of 100%, while 18 F-FDG PET/CT identified 18/19 primary tumors, with a detection rate of 95%. The PPV for both tracers was 100%, the NPV for 18 F-FDG PET/CT was 0%. For metastatic lymph nodes, 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT detected 82 nodes in 7 patients, while 18 F-FDG PET/CT detected 44 nodes in the same 7 patients. TBR was significantly higher for 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with 18 F-FDGPET/CT for primary lesions (TBR blood : 16.33 vs 9.83, P = 0.005; TBR liver : 21.59 vs 7.04, P < 0.0001) and metastatic lymph nodes (TBR blood : 9.16 vs 7.64, P = 0.033; TBR liver : 10.38 vs 5.29, P < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in other semiquantitative parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT had superior performance in detecting primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. 18 F-FAPI-04 exhibited lower uptake in normal tissues, leading to a higher TBR. These findings imply that 18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT has potential for clinical application in cervical cancer.

摘要

背景

通过与18F-FDG PET/CT进行头对头比较,以检测原发性肿瘤和转移性淋巴结,探讨18F-AlF-NOTA-成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂(FAPI)-04 PET/CT(称为18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT)在宫颈癌评估中的潜在效用。

患者和方法

共有22例经病理诊断为宫颈癌的患者在7天内接受了18F-FDG PET/CT和18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT检查。22例患者中,19例(中位年龄62.3岁)纳入最终分析。比较了18F-FDG PET/CT和18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT检测原发性病变和转移性淋巴结的能力;还分析了半定量PET/CT参数,包括SUV最大值、SUV平均值、代谢肿瘤体积(18F-FDG的MTV)和成纤维细胞瘤体积(18F-FAPI-04的FTV)、肿瘤病变糖酵解(18F-FDG的TLG)和肿瘤病变FAPI(18F-FAPI-04的TLF),以及通过将病变的SUV最大值除以正常肝脏或血池的SUV平均值计算得出的肿瘤与背景比值(TBR肝脏和TBR血液)。

结果

与18F-FDG PET/CT相比,18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT发现的原发性病变和转移性淋巴结数量更多。18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT检测到19/19例原发性肿瘤,检出率为100%,而18F-FDG PET/CT识别出18/19例原发性肿瘤,检出率为95%。两种示踪剂的PPV均为100%,18F-FDG PET/CT的NPV为0%。对于转移性淋巴结,18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT在7例患者中检测到82个淋巴结,而18F-FDG PET/CT在同一7例患者中检测到44个淋巴结。与18F-FDG PET/CT相比,18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT在原发性病变(TBR血液:16.33对9.83,P = 0.005;TBR肝脏:21.59对7.04,P < 0.0001)和转移性淋巴结(TBR血液:9.16对7.64,P = 0.033;TBR肝脏:10.38对5.29,P < 0.0001)方面的TBR显著更高。在其他半定量参数方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

与18F-FDG PET/CT相比,18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT在检测宫颈癌原发性病变和转移性淋巴结方面具有更优的性能。18F-FAPI-04在正常组织中的摄取较低,导致TBR更高。这些发现表明18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT在宫颈癌临床应用中具有潜力。

相似文献

1
18 F-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the Evaluation of Patients With Cervical Cancers : Head-to-Head Comparison With 18 F-FDG PET/CT.18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT在宫颈癌患者评估中的应用:与18F-FDG PET/CT的直接对比
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000006103.
2
Comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with 18 F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric and colorectal cancer.68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT 与 18F-FDG PET/CT 诊断和分期胃和结直肠癌的比较。
Nucl Med Commun. 2024 Jul 1;45(7):612-621. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001845. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Comparison of [F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [F]FDG PET/CT for diagnosing lymph node metastasis in malignant tumors.[F]AlF-NOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT与[F]FDG PET/CT在诊断恶性肿瘤淋巴结转移中的比较
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;15:1605568. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1605568. eCollection 2025.
4
Diagnostic Value of [F]-FDG and [ Ga]-FAPI-04 PET/MRI for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer.[F]-FDG和[Ga]-FAPI-04 PET/MRI对甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值
Mol Imaging Biol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-02028-x.
5
Comparison of Al 18 F-NOTA-FAPI-74 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation and Staging of Hepatobiliary Malignancies : A Single-center Prospective Study.18F-NOTA-FAPI-74与18F-FDG PET/CT在肝胆恶性肿瘤评估与分期中的比较:一项单中心前瞻性研究
Clin Nucl Med. 2025 Jul 1;50(7):612-622. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005889. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
6
68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in Selected Breast Cancer Patients With Low FDG Affinity : A Head-to-Head Comparative Study.68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT 用于 FDG 亲和力低的特定乳腺癌患者:一项头对头对比研究。
Clin Nucl Med. 2023 Sep 1;48(9):e420-e430. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004751. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Dual-tracer PET/CT protocol with [F]FDG and [Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 outperforms single-tracer PET/CT with [F]FDG in different cancer types, resulting in larger functional and gross tumor volume.双示踪剂 PET/CT 方案([F]FDG 和 [Ga]Ga-FAPI-46)优于单示踪剂 PET/CT([F]FDG),在不同类型的癌症中,可获得更大的功能和大体肿瘤体积。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Jan;200(1):28-38. doi: 10.1007/s00066-023-02117-2. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
8
Comparative diagnostic performance of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT and [18 F]FDGPET/CT in biliary tract cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.[68 Ga]镓-纤维连接蛋白激活肽正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)与[18 F]氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)在胆管癌中的诊断性能比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07264-5.
9
68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for the Evaluation of Cholangiocarcinoma : Comparison With 18 F-FDG PET/CT and Abdominal 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR.68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT 用于胆管癌评估:与 18F-FDG PET/CT 和腹部 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR 的比较
Clin Nucl Med. 2024 May 1;49(5):409-418. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005112. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
10
Comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma : A Prospective and Single-Center Study.68Ga-FAPI-04 与 18F-FDG PET/CT 在琥珀酸脱氢酶缺陷型肾细胞癌中的对比:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Clin Nucl Med. 2024 Oct 1;49(10):931-937. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000005367. Epub 2024 Jul 3.