Liu Jia, Bi Yanzhen, Ma Xuefeng, Xin Yongning
The Third Clinical Medical College, Qingdao University School of Medicine, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01212-4.
Oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are widely used in managing hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). Among first-line therapies, entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are commonly prescribed. However, their comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear in HBV-ACLF.
We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to January 2025 for studies evaluating ETV, TDF, and TAF in HBV-ACLF. The data were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMD), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
Nine studies (five prospective, four retrospective) were included. TDF significantly improved 12-week survival compared to ETV (SMD = - 0.21; 95% CI - 0.36 to - 0.06), with no significant difference between TDF and TAF. For 12-week HBV-DNA clearance, TAF outperformed ETV (SMD = - 0.40; 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.02), ranking highest in SUCRA (83.5%). TAF also showed superior virological suppression at 4 weeks (SUCRA: TAF 72.2% > ETV 49.1% > TDF 28.8%). TDF improved 12-week model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores more than ETV (SMD = 1.05; 95% CI 0.15-1.94). The drugs did not differ significantly in improving liver function at 4 weeks, as measured by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TBIL) levels. Regarding renal function, ETV had a greater impact on the 4-week estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) than TAF (SMD = - 0.35; 95% CI - 0.52 to 0.18), and both TDF and ETV showed a more significant effect on the 4-week creatinine (cr) levels than TAF (TDF: SMD = 0.29; 95% CI 0.00-0.57; ETV: SMD = 0.30; 95% CI 0.09-0.51).
Overall, TDF and TAF provide superior survival and antiviral benefits over ETV in HBV-ACLF, with three drugs showing similar effects in improving liver function. Moreover, TAF demonstrated the most favorable profile in viral suppression and renal safety.
口服核苷(酸)类似物(NAs)被广泛用于治疗乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)。在一线治疗药物中,恩替卡韦(ETV)、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)是常用的处方药。然而,它们在HBV-ACLF中的相对疗效和安全性尚不清楚。
我们对截至2025年1月的PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和科学网进行了系统检索,以查找评估ETV、TDF和TAF在HBV-ACLF中的研究。使用标准化均值差(SMD)、95%置信区间(95%CI)和累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)对数据进行分析。
纳入了9项研究(5项前瞻性研究,4项回顾性研究)。与ETV相比,TDF显著提高了12周生存率(SMD = -0.21;95%CI -0.36至-0.06),TDF和TAF之间无显著差异。对于12周的HBV-DNA清除率,TAF优于ETV(SMD = -0.40;95%CI -0.77至-0.02),在SUCRA中排名最高(83.5%)。TAF在4周时也显示出更好的病毒学抑制效果(SUCRA:TAF 72.2%>ETV 49.1%>TDF 28.8%)。TDF比ETV更能改善12周终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分(SMD = 1.05;95%CI 0.15 - 1.94)。以丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和总胆红素(TBIL)水平衡量,这三种药物在改善4周肝功能方面无显著差异。关于肾功能,ETV对4周估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的影响大于TAF(SMD = -0.35;95%CI -0.52至0.18),TDF和ETV对4周肌酐(cr)水平的影响均比TAF更显著(TDF:SMD = 0.29;95%CI 0.00 - 0.57;ETV:SMD = 0.30;95%CI 0.09 - 0.51)。
总体而言,在HBV-ACLF中,TDF和TAF在生存和抗病毒方面比ETV更具优势,三种药物在改善肝功能方面效果相似。此外,TAF在病毒抑制和肾脏安全性方面表现出最有利的特征。