Suppr超能文献

漏斗胸修复术后抗菌药物预防性使用与结局

Postoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use and Outcomes in Pectus Excavatum Repair.

作者信息

McKie Kerri A, Moturu Anoosha, Graham Dionne A, Coleman Melvin, Huang Reiping, Grant Catherine, Saito Jacqueline M, Hall Bruce L, Cina Robert A, Newland Jason G, Goretsky Michael J, Ko Clifford Y, Rangel Shawn J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530449. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30449.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) is frequently used following pectus excavatum repair and accounts for the highest relative burden of potentially avoidable postoperative antibiotic days among pediatric general surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis with postoperative rates of surgical site infections, reoperation, and readmission in children undergoing pectus excavatum repair who did and did not receive postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included children aged younger than 18 years undergoing pectus excavatum repair from January 2021 to December 2023 at 141 hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric.

EXPOSURES

Continuation of prophylactic antibiotics after incision closure.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes included 30-day postoperative rates of surgical site infections (SSIs), reoperation, and readmission. Propensity score matching was used to balance groups (without PAP or with PAP) on patient and operative characteristics plausibly associated with PAP use and outcomes. Mixed-effects models were used to compare outcomes between matched groups, with a random effect used to account for hospital clustering. A complementary hospital-level analysis was used to explore the correlation between rates of PAP use and observed to expected (O/E) rate ratios for each outcome after adjusting for differences in patient and procedural characteristics among hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 3552 patients were included (median [IQR] age, 15.4 [14.5-16.4] years; 3099 males [87.3%]). Postoperative prophylaxis was used in 1949 patients (54.9%) for a median (IQR) duration of 21.6 (14.6-24.0) hours. In the matched cohort of 3168 patients, outcomes were similar in children receiving PAP compared with those who did not, with 26 of 1584 (1.6%) of children who received PAP developing an SSI compared with 29 of 1584 (1.8%) of children who did not receive PAP (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50-1.61). For children requiring reoperation, 25 of 1584 (1.6%) received PAP compared with 27 of 1584 (1.7%) who did not (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.52-1.83). For readmission, 41 of 1584 (2.6%) children received PAP compared with 57 of 1584 (3.6%) who did not (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.48-1.34). In the hospital-level analysis, no correlation was found between rates of postoperative prophylaxis use and O/E rate ratios for SSIs (Spearman ρ, -0.07; P = .43), reoperation (Spearman ρ, -0.01; P = .93), or readmission (Spearman ρ, -0.03; P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of 3552 pediatric patients undergoing pectus excavatum repair, postoperative antibiotic use was not associated with improved outcomes, challenging the routine use of postoperative prophylaxis in the operative management of this condition.

摘要

重要性

漏斗胸修复术后常使用术后抗菌预防(PAP),在小儿普通外科手术中,其潜在可避免的术后抗生素使用天数的相对负担最高。

目的

评估接受和未接受术后抗生素预防的漏斗胸修复患儿中,术后抗生素预防与手术部位感染、再次手术和再入院率之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了2021年1月至2023年12月在141家参与国家外科质量改进计划 - 儿科的医院接受漏斗胸修复的18岁以下儿童。

暴露因素

切口闭合后继续使用预防性抗生素。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局包括术后30天的手术部位感染(SSI)、再次手术和再入院率。倾向评分匹配用于平衡两组(未使用PAP或使用PAP)在可能与PAP使用及结局相关的患者和手术特征方面的差异。混合效应模型用于比较匹配组之间的结局,采用随机效应来考虑医院聚类情况。一项补充性的医院层面分析用于探索在调整医院间患者和手术特征差异后,PAP使用率与各结局的观察到预期(O/E)率比之间的相关性。

结果

共纳入3552例患者(中位年龄[四分位间距],15.4[14.5 - 16.4]岁;3099例男性[87.3%])。1949例患者(54.9%)使用了术后预防措施,中位(四分位间距)持续时间为21.6(14.6 - 24.0)小时。在3168例患者的匹配队列中,接受PAP的儿童与未接受PAP的儿童结局相似,接受PAP的1584例儿童中有26例(1.6%)发生手术部位感染,未接受PAP的1584例儿童中有29例(1.8%)发生手术部位感染(优势比[OR],0.90;95%置信区间,0.50 - 1.61)。对于需要再次手术的儿童,接受PAP的1584例中有25例(1.6%),未接受PAP的1584例中有27例(1.7%)(OR,0.98;95%置信区间,0.52 - 1.83)。对于再入院情况,接受PAP的1584例儿童中有41例(2.6%),未接受PAP的1584例中有57例(3.6%)(OR,0.81;95%置信区间,0.48 - 1.34)。在医院层面分析中,未发现术后预防措施使用率与手术部位感染的O/E率比(斯皮尔曼ρ, - 0.07;P = 0.43)、再次手术(斯皮尔曼ρ, - 0.01;P = 0.93)或再入院(斯皮尔曼ρ, - 0.03;P = 0.65)之间存在相关性。

结论和相关性

在这项对3552例接受漏斗胸修复的儿科患者的队列研究中,术后使用抗生素与改善结局无关,这对该疾病手术管理中常规使用术后预防措施提出了挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/278f/12411969/9647969d9c28/jamanetwopen-e2530449-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验