Suppr超能文献

通过体内共聚焦显微镜评估糖尿病患者角膜神经纤维的方法:一项范围综述

Methods for the evaluation of corneal nerve fibres in diabetes mellitus by in vivo confocal microscopy: a scoping review.

作者信息

Sandvik Siv A, Morisbakk Tove Lise, Lundanes Eilin, Lid Jorunn, Lagali Neil, Sundling Vibeke

机构信息

Department of Optometry, Radiology and Lighting Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway

Department of Optometry, Radiology and Lighting Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 4;15(9):e098294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098294.

Abstract

AIM

To map, summarise and analyse the methodologies of corneal nerve fibre imaging in studies using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in diabetes and assess the potential for standardising methods and reporting.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using five databases, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and Scopus, with search terms related to IVCM, diabetes and corneal nerves. Two researchers independently screened the studies for eligibility. Relevant data were extracted and systematically analysed.

RESULTS

Out of 1533 screened articles, 195 met the inclusion criteria. Spanning from 2000 to 2024, the studies showed high variability in image acquisition, image processing, image analysis and reporting detail. Most studies used laser scanning confocal microscopy, examining the central cornea in both eyes in patients with type 2 diabetes, manually selecting 3-6 images from each eye, and using ACCMetrics and CCMetrics for quantifying corneal nerve fibre length in mm/mm. Many studies lacked sufficient methodological details for reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

IVCM studies of corneal nerve fibres in diabetes show substantial methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting, limiting reproducibility. We propose a guideline to support standardisation and improve the reliability of future research.

摘要

目的

在糖尿病患者体内共聚焦显微镜(IVCM)研究中,绘制、总结并分析角膜神经纤维成像方法,评估方法标准化及报告的可能性。

方法

使用五个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science和Scopus)进行范围综述,搜索词与IVCM、糖尿病和角膜神经相关。两名研究人员独立筛选研究的合格性。提取相关数据并进行系统分析。

结果

在1533篇筛选文章中,195篇符合纳入标准。研究时间跨度从2000年至2024年,在图像采集、图像处理、图像分析和报告细节方面显示出高度变异性。大多数研究使用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜,检查2型糖尿病患者双眼的中央角膜,每只眼睛手动选择3至6张图像,并使用ACCMetrics和CCMetrics以毫米/毫米为单位量化角膜神经纤维长度。许多研究缺乏足够的方法学细节以实现可重复性。

结论

糖尿病患者角膜神经纤维的IVCM研究显示出显著的方法学异质性和报告不一致性,限制了可重复性。我们提出一项指南以支持标准化并提高未来研究的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0891/12414215/9e98345d9733/bmjopen-15-9-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验