• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前循环大梗死核心区卒中血管内治疗后无效再通的预测因素

Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular therapy in anterior circulation stroke with large core infarction.

作者信息

Li Qinhong, Ding Chawen, Chen Boyu, Tian Zhenxuan, Chen Yujie, Li Linyu, Yu Nizhen, Song Jiaxing, Yang Jie, Guo Changwei, Huang Jiacheng, Zi Wenjie, Yang Zhao

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1630438. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630438. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1630438
PMID:40908997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12406493/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data to predict futile recanalization (FR) after endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) with large core infarction.

METHODS

This analysis included patients from a national multicenter stroke registry (November 2021 to February 2023). Patients who achieved successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] score ≥2b) after EVT were categorized into two groups: meaningful recanalization (MR; 90-day modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-3) and FR (mRS 4-6). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of FR.

RESULTS

Among 313 patients with successful recanalization, 171 (54.6%) experienced FR, and 142 (45.4%) achieved MR. Multivariate analysis showed that a higher baseline NIH Stroke Scale score ( < 0.001), older age ( < 0.001), elevated blood glucose ( = 0.003), poor collateral circulation ( = 0.004), and incomplete recanalization (eTICI 2b vs. 3;  < 0.001) were predictors of FR.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACLVO and large core infarction, age, hyperglycemia, baseline NIHSS, poor collaterals, and incomplete recanalization were independent predictors of FR. These findings may be used to guide treatment decisions and optimize management processes.

摘要

背景

在伴有大面积梗死核心的急性前循环大血管闭塞(ACLVO)患者中,缺乏数据来预测血管内治疗(EVT)后无效再通(FR)情况。

方法

本分析纳入了来自全国多中心卒中登记处(2021年11月至2023年2月)的患者。在接受EVT后实现成功再通(扩展脑梗死溶栓[eTICI]评分≥2b)的患者被分为两组:有意义再通(MR;90天改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分为0 - 3)和无效再通(FR;mRS评分为4 - 6)。进行多因素逻辑回归以确定FR的独立预测因素。

结果

在313例成功再通的患者中,171例(54.6%)出现无效再通,142例(45.4%)实现有意义再通。多因素分析显示,较高的基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(<0.001)、年龄较大(<0.001)、血糖升高(=0.003)、侧支循环不良(=0.004)和再通不完全(eTICI 2b与3;<0.001)是无效再通的预测因素。

结论

在伴有大面积梗死核心的ACLVO患者中,年龄、高血糖、基线NIHSS评分、侧支循环不良和再通不完全是无效再通的独立预测因素。这些发现可用于指导治疗决策并优化管理流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/bf9d24f37c75/fneur-16-1630438-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/a94b5f2f1578/fneur-16-1630438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/00fd416d5cb7/fneur-16-1630438-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/bf9d24f37c75/fneur-16-1630438-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/a94b5f2f1578/fneur-16-1630438-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/00fd416d5cb7/fneur-16-1630438-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a44/12406493/bf9d24f37c75/fneur-16-1630438-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular therapy in anterior circulation stroke with large core infarction.前循环大梗死核心区卒中血管内治疗后无效再通的预测因素
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1630438. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630438. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictors of Futile Recanalization After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Large Vessel Occlusive Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Secondary Analysis of RESCUE-ICAS.急性大脑动脉粥样硬化性大血管闭塞血管内治疗后无效再通的预测因素:RESCUE-ICAS的二次分析
Neurosurgery. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003658.
3
Futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion: assessment of the underlying etiology and the role of perfusion imaging.基底动脉闭塞患者的无效再通:潜在病因评估及灌注成像的作用
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jul 14;17(8):837-842. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-021967.
4
Favorable Cerebral Collateral Cascades Improve Futile Recanalization by Reducing Ischemic Core Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment.有利的脑侧支循环级联通过减少接受血管内治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的缺血核心体积来改善无效再通。
Transl Stroke Res. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1007/s12975-025-01340-6.
5
Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts.伴有大面积与非大面积梗死的基底动脉闭塞患者无效再通的预测因素
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039941. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039941. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
6
Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Acute Stroke After Successful Endovascular Therapy: The ANGEL-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内治疗成功后动脉内注射替奈普酶治疗急性卒中:ANGEL-TNK随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.10800.
7
Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.血管内治疗急性缺血性卒中后无效再通的预测因素。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03719-8.
8
Effect of Intravenous Alteplase Before Endovascular Thrombectomy on Outcome After Unsuccessful Recanalization in the DIRECT-MT Trial.DIRECT-MT试验中血管内血栓切除术之前静脉注射阿替普酶对再通失败后结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;194:123569. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123569. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
9
Predictors of futile recanalisation in patients with large infarct: a post-hoc analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT trial.大面积梗死患者无效再通的预测因素:ANGEL-ASPECT试验的事后分析
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2025 Jul 6. doi: 10.1136/svn-2024-003382.
10
Factors Associated with Functional Outcome Following Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to M1 MCA/ICA Occlusion in the Extended Time Window.在延长时间窗内,与大脑中动脉M1段/颈内动脉闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中后功能结局相关的因素
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 6;14(15):5556. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155556.

本文引用的文献

1
Key to better outcomes in stroke intervention: early versus complete reperfusion in first pass recanalization.卒中干预取得更好疗效的关键:首次再通中的早期与完全再灌注
J Neurol. 2025 Jul 11;272(8):504. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13235-5.
2
Detrimental Effect of Acute Hyperglycemia on the Outcomes of Large Ischemic Region Stroke.急性高血糖对大面积缺血性脑卒中预后的有害影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 3;13(23):e034556. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034556. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Predictors of futile recanalization in ischemic stroke patients with low baseline NIHSS.
低基线 NIHSS 的缺血性脑卒中患者再通无效的预测因素。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Dec;19(10):1102-1112. doi: 10.1177/17474930241264737. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
4
Endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment in patients with established large infarct: a cohort study.已发生大面积梗死患者的血管内治疗与标准药物治疗的比较:一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4775-4784. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001539.
5
Stress hyperglycemia is associated with futile recanalization in patients with anterior large vessel occlusion undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.应激性高血糖与接受机械取栓的前大血管闭塞患者无效再通相关。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Sep;9(3):613-622. doi: 10.1177/23969873241247400. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes.大型缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术试验
N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 25;390(4):388. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx230009.
7
Functional Outcome Prediction in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using a Fused Imaging and Clinical Deep Learning Model.使用融合影像与临床深度学习模型对急性缺血性脑卒中的功能预后进行预测。
Stroke. 2023 Sep;54(9):2316-2327. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044072. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Thrombectomy for M2 Occlusions: Predictors of Successful and Futile Recanalization.M2 闭塞取栓术:有效和无效再通的预测因素。
Stroke. 2023 Aug;54(8):2002-2012. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043285. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
9
Effect of Imaging Selection Paradigms on Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.影像学选择范式对急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内血栓切除术结局的影响。
Stroke. 2023 Jun;54(6):1569-1577. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.042203. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
CT Perfusion vs Noncontrast CT for Late Window Stroke Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CT 灌注与非对比 CT 用于晚期窗内卒中取栓:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2023 May 30;100(22):e2304-e2311. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207262. Epub 2023 Mar 29.