Almubaraki Moayyad, Elnasieh Abdulrahman M, Alangari Abdulmohsen
Department of Family Medicine, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 4;17(8):e89338. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89338. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Insulin overbasalization, which refers to the excessive use of basal insulin despite achieving target fasting glucose levels, poses significant clinical risks in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. This practice can lead to adverse outcomes such as increased hypoglycemia, weight gain, and complications in glycemic control, which ultimately affect the patient's quality of life. Studies indicate that approximately 25-30% of patients on insulin therapy may experience overbasalization, highlighting the urgency of addressing this issue. Given their pivotal role in diabetes management, it is essential to assess family medicine residents (FMRs)' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding insulin titration to ensure optimal patient outcomes.
This study aims to explore FMRs' KAP to identify gaps and promote evidence-based, patient-centered diabetes care strategies.
A cross-sectional study using stratified random sampling was conducted among FMRs at King Saud Medical City from June 2024 to April 2025. Data were collected via a validated self-administered questionnaire, which underwent content validation by a panel of experts in family medicine and diabetes management. The questionnaire was then pilot-tested for reliability and clarity before the main study. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 29.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2022. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).
A total of 101 FMRs were assessed. Most were female (n=55, 54.5%) and in their first (n=43, 42.6%) and second (n=37, 36.6%) residency years. The majority had no additional qualifications (n=59, 58.4%). More than half (n=55, 54.5%) had never heard of insulin overbasalization, and only 18 (17.8%) were familiar with the concept. Hypoglycemia (n=78, 77.2%) and weight gain (n=50, 49.5%) were the most commonly recognized consequences. Good knowledge was seen in 53 (52.5%) participants. Only 9 (8.9%) were fully confident in managing overbasalization, and 79 (78.2%) had never educated patients about it. Attitude/practice scores were significantly associated with residency level (p = 0.023), but knowledge scores were not (p = 0.137). Logistic regression confirmed residency year as a significant predictor of good practice (OR = 1.74, p = 0.043). A positive correlation between knowledge and practice was also observed (r = 0.339, p = 0.001).
This study revealed limited awareness and confidence among FMRs regarding insulin overbasalization. While knowledge alone was not significantly linked to residency level, more training years predicted better practice. A significant correlation between knowledge and practice highlights the need for early, targeted education to enhance insulin management skills in primary care.
胰岛素超基础量使用是指尽管空腹血糖水平已达到目标,但仍过度使用基础胰岛素,这在2型糖尿病管理中带来了重大临床风险。这种做法可能导致诸如低血糖增加、体重增加以及血糖控制并发症等不良后果,最终影响患者的生活质量。研究表明,接受胰岛素治疗的患者中约25 - 30%可能会出现超基础量使用胰岛素的情况,凸显了解决这一问题的紧迫性。鉴于家庭医学住院医师(FMRs)在糖尿病管理中的关键作用,评估他们关于胰岛素滴定的知识、态度和实践(KAP)以确保患者获得最佳治疗效果至关重要。
本研究旨在探讨FMRs的KAP,以识别差距并推广基于证据的、以患者为中心的糖尿病护理策略。
2024年6月至2025年4月,在沙特国王医疗城对FMRs进行了一项采用分层随机抽样的横断面研究。通过一份经过验证的自填式问卷收集数据,该问卷经过家庭医学和糖尿病管理专家小组的内容验证。在主要研究之前,对问卷进行了预测试以检验其信度和清晰度。使用SPSS Statistics 29.0版(IBM公司。2022年发布。适用于Windows的IBM SPSS Statistics,版本29.0。纽约州阿蒙克:IBM公司)对数据进行分析。
共评估了101名FMRs。大多数为女性(n = 55,54.5%),处于第一年(n = 43,42.6%)和第二年(n = 37,36.6%)住院医师培训阶段。大多数人没有其他资质(n = 59,58.4%)。超过一半(n = 55,54.5%)的人从未听说过胰岛素超基础量使用,只有18人(17.8%)熟悉这一概念。低血糖(n = 78,77.2%)和体重增加(n = 50,49.5%)是最常被认识到的后果。53名(52.5%)参与者知识掌握良好。只有9人(8.9%)对管理超基础量使用胰岛素完全有信心,79人(78.2%)从未就此事对患者进行过教育。态度/实践得分与住院医师培训水平显著相关(p = 0.023),但知识得分则不然(p = 0.137)。逻辑回归证实住院医师培训年份是良好实践的显著预测因素(OR = 1.74,p = 0.043)。还观察到知识与实践之间存在正相关(r = 0.339,p = 0.001)。
本研究揭示了FMRs对胰岛素超基础量使用的认识和信心有限。虽然知识本身与住院医师培训水平没有显著关联,但更多的培训年份预示着更好的实践。知识与实践之间的显著相关性凸显了早期进行有针对性教育以提高初级保健中胰岛素管理技能的必要性。