Hogeveen Jeremy, Campbell Ethan, Aragon Denicia, Pearson Ebony, Enders Caitlin, Romero John, Brown Lauren, Campbell Richard A, Gill Darbi, Quinn Davin K, Husain Masud, Mayer Andrew R, Costa Vincent D
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 26:2025.08.22.25334260. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.22.25334260.
Clinical apathy might result from either a diminished willingness to exert effort for known rewards or from reduced motivation to explore potentially beneficial future opportunities. To identify the underlying cognitive and neural bases of apathy, we used task-based fMRI to examine motivated choice computations in patients with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI)-a condition frequently associated with apathy-and compared their behavior and neural activity to that of healthy controls (CTRLs). Participants performed two choice tasks involving distinct types of motivational tradeoffs: i) An effort-value tradeoff task (the 'Apples Task') requiring them to decide how much physical effort they were willing to exert for varying reward magnitudes, and ii) An explore-exploit tradeoff task (the 'Novelty-Bandit Task') requiring them to choose between exploiting options with a known history of reward or exploring novel options with uncertain but potentially higher future value. Across both TBI and CTRL, higher apathy was associated with steeper effort-based discounting of rewards. This behavioral pattern was linked to heightened neural encoding of effort costs in a common network including central somatomotor areas, midcingulate, middle insula, and putamen across both TBI and CTRL. In contrast, the explore-exploit task revealed a neurocomputational signature of apathy unique to TBI. Apathy in TBI was not associated with an impaired ability to learn the immediate expected value of choices, but with a specific reduction in the latent valuation of gaining information about future rewards. This behavioral deficit was directly tied to blunted encoding of reward prediction errors (RPEs) when participants' received feedback about their choices in frontopolar cortex (FPC), ventromedial prefrontal cortex, cingulate, insula, and dorsal and ventral striatum. These findings suggest a dual-mechanism account of apathy. While an aversion to effort may be a transdiagnostic feature of apathy, clinical apathy acquired after a TBI may be uniquely characterized by an impairment in future-oriented decision making. Optimistic valuation of uncertain choice opportunities elicits RPE when decisions to explore those opportunities are rewarded or unrewarded. We propose that blunted RPE encoding in prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia in TBI degrades a crucial teaching signal-preventing the individual from learning about the benefits of engaging in directed exploration of novel options, thereby diminishing their motivation to explore again in the future. This specific deficit in outcome monitoring and brain networks that encode RPEs at feedback highlights a potential target for neuromodulatory interventions aimed at rescuing motivation in patients with TBI.
临床冷漠可能源于为已知奖励付出努力的意愿降低,或者探索潜在有益未来机会的动机减弱。为了确定冷漠的潜在认知和神经基础,我们使用基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检查慢性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者(一种常与冷漠相关的病症)的动机选择计算,并将他们的行为和神经活动与健康对照组(CTRLs)进行比较。参与者执行了两项涉及不同类型动机权衡的选择任务:i)努力 - 价值权衡任务(“苹果任务”),要求他们决定为不同的奖励幅度愿意付出多少体力努力;ii)探索 - 利用权衡任务(“新奇 - 强盗任务”),要求他们在利用有已知奖励历史的选项和探索具有不确定但潜在更高未来价值的新选项之间进行选择。在TBI组和CTRL组中,冷漠程度越高,基于努力的奖励折扣越陡峭。这种行为模式与包括中央躯体运动区域、扣带回中部、脑岛中部和壳核在内的共同网络中努力成本的神经编码增强有关,在TBI组和CTRL组中均如此。相比之下,探索 - 利用任务揭示了TBI特有的冷漠神经计算特征。TBI患者的冷漠与学习选择的即时预期价值的能力受损无关,而是与获取未来奖励信息的潜在价值评估的特定降低有关。当参与者在额极皮质(FPC)、腹内侧前额叶皮质、扣带回、脑岛以及背侧和腹侧纹状体中收到关于他们选择的反馈时,这种行为缺陷直接与奖励预测误差(RPEs)的编码减弱相关。这些发现表明了一种关于冷漠的双重机制解释。虽然对努力的厌恶可能是冷漠的一种跨诊断特征,但TBI后出现的临床冷漠可能具有以面向未来的决策受损为独特特征。当探索这些机会的决定得到奖励或未得到奖励时,对不确定选择机会的乐观评估会引发RPE。我们提出,TBI患者前额叶皮质和基底神经节中RPE编码减弱会降低一个关键的教学信号,阻止个体了解参与对新选项进行定向探索的好处,从而削弱他们未来再次探索的动机。在反馈时对结果进行监测以及对编码RPE的脑网络的这种特定缺陷突出了旨在挽救TBI患者动机的神经调节干预的潜在靶点。