Suppr超能文献

髌骨脱位或半脱位患者胫骨结节-罗马弓距离与胫骨结节-滑车沟距离的比较。

Comparison of tibial tubercle-Roman arch distance and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance in patients with patellar dislocation or subluxation.

作者信息

Aksakal Eda Tezgör, Soydan Hamza, Çay Nurdan

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11982-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) and tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distances in patients with patellar dislocation or subluxation, evaluate TT-RA reliability and reproducibility, and determine pathological threshold values for surgical treatment using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis included 259 patient and 262 control examinations of knee MRIs and/or CTs performed. TT-RA, TT-TG, and tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distances, Roman Arch height, trochlear sulcus angle, and total femoral condyle width were measured by two radiologists, and trochlear morphology was assessed. Measurements were compared using the Student's t-test. Reliability and reproducibility were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis determined pathological thresholds, and Pearson correlation compared TT-TG and TT-RA.

RESULTS

TT-RA, TT-TG, TT-PCL distances, and trochlear sulcus angles were significantly different between patient and control groups (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses for MRI and CT also showed significant differences (p < 0.001). TT-RA distance had higher ICC values for reproducibility and reliability (> 0.959; > 0.988). ROC analysis determined MRI thresholds as TT-RA > 17.30 mm, TT-TG > 13.30 mm, TT-PCL > 23.8 mm, and trochlear sulcus angle > 146°; for CT, TT-RA > 18.80 mm, TT-TG > 15.60 mm, TT-PCL > 21.5 mm, and trochlear sulcus angle > 148°. Strong correlation was found between TT-TG and TT-RA distances (r = 0.867, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TT-RA distance is a reliable and reproducible method for tibial tubercle localization and shows higher reliability than TT-TG. Thresholds of 17.3 mm (MRI) and 18.8 mm (CT) for TT-RA can guide surgical indications.

KEY POINTS

Question The reliable measurement of the tibial tubercle lateralization is crucial for planning the treatment of patients with patellar dislocation/subluxation. Findings The tibial tubercle-Roman arch (TT-RA) distance is more reliable and repeatable than the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance in patients with patellar dislocation and subluxation. Clinical relevance TT-RA distance can be used in clinical practice as an alternative to tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance for surgical treatment indications in patients with patellar subluxation and dislocation.

摘要

目的

比较髌骨脱位或半脱位患者的胫骨结节-滑车沟(TT-TG)和胫骨结节-罗马弓(TT-RA)距离,评估TT-RA的可靠性和可重复性,并使用磁共振成像(MRI)和计算机断层扫描(CT)确定手术治疗的病理阈值。

材料与方法

回顾性分析包括259例患者以及262例对照者的膝关节MRI和/或CT检查。由两名放射科医生测量TT-RA、TT-TG和胫骨结节-后交叉韧带(TT-PCL)距离、罗马弓高度、滑车沟角度和股骨髁总宽度,并评估滑车形态。使用学生t检验比较测量结果。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性和可重复性。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析确定病理阈值,并使用Pearson相关性比较TT-TG和TT-RA。

结果

患者组和对照组之间的TT-RA、TT-TG、TT-PCL距离以及滑车沟角度存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。MRI和CT的亚组分析也显示出显著差异(p < 0.001)。TT-RA距离在可重复性和可靠性方面具有更高的ICC值(> 0.959;> 0.988)。ROC分析确定MRI的阈值为TT-RA > 17.30 mm、TT-TG > 13.30 mm、TT-PCL > 23.8 mm以及滑车沟角度 > 146°;对于CT,TT-RA > 18.80 mm、TT-TG > 15.60 mm、TT-PCL > 并21.并5 mm以及滑车沟角度 > 148°。发现TT-TG和TT-RA距离之间存在强相关性(r = 0.867,p < 0.001)。

结论

TT-RA距离是一种用于胫骨结节定位的可靠且可重复的方法,并且显示出比TT-TG更高的可靠性。TT-RA的17.3 mm(MRI)和18.8 mm(CT)阈值可指导手术指征。

关键点

问题 可靠测量胫骨结节侧方移位对于规划髌骨脱位/半脱位患者的治疗至关重要。发现 在髌骨脱位和半脱位患者中,胫骨结节-罗马弓(TT-RA)距离比胫骨结节-滑车沟(TT-TG)距离更可靠且可重复。临床意义 TT-RA距离可在临床实践中用作替代胫骨结节-滑车沟(TT-TG)距离,用于髌骨半脱位和脱位患者的手术治疗指征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验