Mirahmadi Alireza, Hosseini-Monfared Pooya, Farrokhi Mehrdad, Minaie Raza, Bateni Amin, Kazemi Seyed Morteza
Bone Joint and Related Tissues Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 5;20(9):e0330685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330685. eCollection 2025.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with a significant burden in orthopedic surgeries, leading to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs. Despite the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of infection, the optimal duration for antibiotic administration remains controversial. Newer studies reported controversial results compared to existing guidelines; therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and post-operative complications of short-term (<24 hours) and extended oral antibiotics in reducing infection rates following orthopedic surgeries.
In this retrospective study, patients who underwent orthopedic surgeries, including total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, and hip internal fixation, were recruited from the hospital data registry. Patients were divided into two groups of short-term (<24 hours) and extended oral antibiotics groups based on the duration of prophylactic antibiotic use. The infection rate during three months after the surgery and the incidence of antibiotic-related adverse events were compared between the groups.
Of the 398 patients in the study, 246 received short-term, and 152 received extended oral antibiotics. There was no significant difference between the short-term (2.8%) and extended (4.6%) groups with respect to the rate of SSI (P = 0.35). The patients in the extended antibiotic group demonstrated more post-operative complications compared to the short-term group (36.2% Vs. 22.8%, P = 0.004).
Our findings demonstrated that extended oral antibiotics did not reduce the rate of SSI following orthopedic surgeries compared to short-term prophylaxis. Furthermore, patients who received prolonged antibiotic demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Our study supports the recommendation not to use extended prophylactic oral antibiotics over 24 hours in orthopedic surgeries.
手术部位感染(SSI)在骨科手术中造成了重大负担,导致发病率增加、住院时间延长和医疗成本升高。尽管预防性使用抗生素以降低感染风险已广泛应用,但抗生素给药的最佳持续时间仍存在争议。与现有指南相比,最新研究报告了有争议的结果;因此,我们旨在比较短期(<24小时)和延长口服抗生素在降低骨科手术后感染率方面的疗效和术后并发症。
在这项回顾性研究中,从医院数据登记处招募了接受骨科手术的患者,包括全膝关节置换术(TKA)、全髋关节置换术(THA)、前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术和髋关节内固定术。根据预防性抗生素使用的持续时间,将患者分为短期(<24小时)和延长口服抗生素两组。比较两组术后三个月内的感染率和抗生素相关不良事件的发生率。
在该研究的398例患者中,246例接受了短期抗生素治疗,152例接受了延长口服抗生素治疗。短期组(2.8%)和延长组(4.6%)的手术部位感染率无显著差异(P = 0.35)。与短期组相比,延长抗生素组的患者术后并发症更多(36.2%对22.8%,P = 0.004)。
我们的研究结果表明,与短期预防相比,延长口服抗生素并不能降低骨科手术后的手术部位感染率。此外,接受延长抗生素治疗的患者术后并发症的发生率更高。我们的研究支持在骨科手术中不使用超过24小时的延长预防性口服抗生素的建议。