Lee So-Young, Lee Seung-Hee
Department of Medical Education, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Department of Medical Education, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Med Educ. 2025 Sep;37(3):247-267. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2025.339. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
This study examines the implementation of the competency-based curriculum (CBC), which has become the primary educational model in Korean medical schools. It also presents valid evaluation criteria developed through expert consensus to support ongoing improvements in curriculum quality.
This study examines the implementation of the CBC, which has become the primary educational model in Korean medical schools. It also presents valid evaluation criteria developed through expert consensus to support ongoing improvements in curriculum quality.
Three rounds of Delphi surveys were completed to validate the valid evaluation criteria. Criteria with lower content validity ratios were revised and supplemented based on expert feedback. Ultimately, the process resulted in the identification of five evaluation areas, 16 evaluation items, and 51 evaluation indicators. Among these, the indicators focusing on learner achievement were found to be the most significant.
This study developed an evaluation model and valid evaluation criteria specifically designed for the curricula of Korean medical schools. These were created based on expert consensus, which adds to the strength and relevance of the proposed framework. The establishment of valid evaluation criteria is expected to enhance evaluation practices, promote educational quality, and support the continuous improvement of medical education.
本研究考察了基于能力的课程(CBC)的实施情况,该课程已成为韩国医学院校的主要教育模式。本研究还提出了通过专家共识制定的有效评估标准,以支持课程质量的持续提升。
本研究考察了基于能力的课程(CBC)的实施情况,该课程已成为韩国医学院校的主要教育模式。本研究还提出了通过专家共识制定的有效评估标准,以支持课程质量的持续提升。
完成了三轮德尔菲调查以验证有效评估标准。基于专家反馈,对内容效度比低的标准进行了修订和补充。最终,该过程确定了五个评估领域、16个评估项目和51个评估指标。其中,关注学习者成绩的指标被认为是最重要的。
本研究开发了一个专门针对韩国医学院校课程的评估模型和有效评估标准。这些是基于专家共识创建的,这增加了所提议框架的力度和相关性。有效评估标准的建立有望加强评估实践、提升教育质量并支持医学教育的持续改进。