Usta Mehmet, Ozer Sensoy Nur, Ortac Hatice, Ersoy Alparslan
Department of Nephrology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa City Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2556293. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2556293. Epub 2025 Sep 7.
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) are the two primary renal replacement therapies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). While PD is an effective and convenient modality, long-term use can lead to ultrafiltration failure, recurrent peritonitis, and progressive structural alterations in the peritoneal membrane, necessitating a transition to HD. In recent years, rather than a complete transition, the combined use of PD and HD has emerged as a viable alternative, offering potential advantages for selected patient populations.This retrospective study included patients with PD-related complications, such as resistant hypervolemia, frequent peritonitis episodes, peritoneal failure, and clinical deterioration. Based on eligibility criteria, patients were either transitioned to HD or initiated on combined PD+HD therapy. A total of 28 patients underwent transition to HD, while 26 received PD+HD combination therapy. Survival rates, Kt/V, residual urine output, and various laboratory parameters were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in Kt/V, volume stabilization, and cardiovascular stability after transitioning from PD. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in laboratory parameters between the two groups. These findings suggest that for patients experiencing PD failure, frequent peritonitis, or fluid overload, combined PD+HD therapy may serve as a feasible alternative to conventional HD. Careful patient selection and individualized treatment planning are crucial for optimizing outcomes. Given its comparable efficacy to HD, combined PD+HD therapy may represent an important option for patients requiring a tailored approach to dialysis.
腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)是终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的两种主要肾脏替代疗法。虽然腹膜透析是一种有效且方便的治疗方式,但长期使用可能导致超滤失败、反复性腹膜炎以及腹膜结构的渐进性改变,从而需要转为血液透析。近年来,腹膜透析和血液透析联合使用而非完全转为血液透析已成为一种可行的替代方案,为特定患者群体带来了潜在优势。这项回顾性研究纳入了患有与腹膜透析相关并发症的患者,如难治性高血容量、频繁腹膜炎发作、腹膜衰竭和临床病情恶化。根据入选标准,患者要么转为血液透析,要么开始接受腹膜透析 + 血液透析联合治疗。共有28例患者转为血液透析,而26例接受了腹膜透析 + 血液透析联合治疗。对两组患者的生存率、Kt/V、残余尿量和各种实验室参数进行了评估和比较。两组患者从腹膜透析转为其他治疗后,Kt/V、容量稳定和心血管稳定性均有显著改善。然而,两组之间的实验室参数未观察到统计学上的显著差异。这些发现表明,对于出现腹膜透析失败、频繁腹膜炎或液体过载的患者,腹膜透析 + 血液透析联合治疗可能是传统血液透析的一种可行替代方案。仔细的患者选择和个体化治疗计划对于优化治疗效果至关重要。鉴于其与血液透析相当的疗效,腹膜透析 + 血液透析联合治疗可能是需要量身定制透析方法的患者的一个重要选择。