• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过管理课程探索学生药剂师的时间管理和职业规划态度:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究

Exploring Student Pharmacists' Time Management and Career Planning Attitudes Through a Management Course: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Ulutaş Deniz Elif, Eren Rumeysa

机构信息

Atatürk University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Management, Erzurum, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Pharm Sci. 2025 Sep 5;22(4):294-304. doi: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.57442.

DOI:10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.57442
PMID:40916445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415658/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to incorporate a pharmacy management course into pharmacy education and explore students' time management and career planning attitudes in relation to this course.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This research, conducted between October 2, 2023, and January 12, 2024, employed a mixed-methods design, integrating both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies within a single study framework. Quantitative data were collected using the Sociodemographic Form, Career Futures Inventory (CFI), and Time Management Questionnaire (TMQ). A semi-structured interview form was employed to gather qualitative data. This study included 60 fifth-year pharmacy students. The experimental group (n=30) comprised volunteers enrolled in the "Management in Pharmacy" elective course, while the control group (n=30) consisted of randomly selected volunteers not enrolled in the course.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, pre-test TMQ scores ranged from 56 to 117, yielding a mean score of 80.50±16.12. Post-test scores ranged from 55 to 112, with an average of 86.83±14.09. There was a significant difference in the change in the TMQ scores and Time Attitude scores between the control and intervention groups (=0.003 and =0.001, respectively). For the intervention group, pre-test CFI scores ranged from 63 to 116, yielding a mean score of 85.93±15.34. Post-test scores ranged from 68 to 111, with an average of 89.40±12.56. No significant difference was observed in the change in the CFI scores between the control and intervention groups (=0.311). Student feedback provided insight into the necessity or usefulness, impact, and future suggestions concerning the delivery of this course.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of educational resources and methodologies aimed at fostering time management abilities and encouraging career planning attitudes from the initial phases of pharmacy education may result in greater outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将一门药学管理课程纳入药学教育,并探讨学生与该课程相关的时间管理和职业规划态度。

材料与方法

本研究于2023年10月2日至2024年1月12日进行,采用混合方法设计,在单一研究框架内整合定性和定量研究方法。使用社会人口学表格、职业未来量表(CFI)和时间管理问卷(TMQ)收集定量数据。采用半结构化访谈表格收集定性数据。本研究纳入了60名五年级药学专业学生。实验组(n = 30)由参加“药学管理”选修课程的志愿者组成,而对照组(n = 30)由未参加该课程的随机选择的志愿者组成。

结果

在干预组中,TMQ预测试分数范围为56至117,平均分数为80.50±16.12。后测试分数范围为55至112,平均分数为86.83±14.09。对照组和干预组之间TMQ分数和时间态度分数的变化存在显著差异(分别为=0.003和=0.001)。对于干预组,CFI预测试分数范围为63至116,平均分数为85.93±15.34。后测试分数范围为68至111,平均分数为89.40±12.56。对照组和干预组之间CFI分数的变化未观察到显著差异(=0.311)。学生反馈提供了有关该课程授课的必要性或有用性、影响及未来建议的见解。

结论

在药学教育的初始阶段实施旨在培养时间管理能力和鼓励职业规划态度的教育资源和方法可能会产生更好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/12415658/de801366fc1f/TurkJPharmSci-22-4-294-figure-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/12415658/de801366fc1f/TurkJPharmSci-22-4-294-figure-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/954c/12415658/de801366fc1f/TurkJPharmSci-22-4-294-figure-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Student Pharmacists' Time Management and Career Planning Attitudes Through a Management Course: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.通过管理课程探索学生药剂师的时间管理和职业规划态度:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究
Turk J Pharm Sci. 2025 Sep 5;22(4):294-304. doi: 10.4274/tjps.galenos.2025.57442.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
Interventions to reduce non-prescription antimicrobial sales in community pharmacies.减少社区药房非处方抗菌药物销售的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD013722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013722.pub2.
5
Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.封闭系统药物转移装置加危险药物安全操作与仅进行安全操作相比,对减少医护人员接触输注性危险药物的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD012860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012860.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
8
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.针对哮喘儿童的家庭式教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
9
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
10
Unrolling the Mat: A Mixed-Methods Study of Yoga Awareness, Perceptions, and Barriers to Daily Practice Among MBBS Students.展开瑜伽垫:一项关于MBBS学生的瑜伽意识、认知及日常练习障碍的混合方法研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 4;17(7):e87306. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87306. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of the Management in Nursing course on students' time management and career planning attitudes: A single-group pre-test post-test study.《护理管理课程对学生时间管理及职业规划态度的影响:单组前后测研究》
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jun;125:105797. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105797. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
2
Enhancing Pharmacy Faculty Well-Being and Productivity While Reducing Burnout.提升药学教师的幸福感和生产力,同时减少职业倦怠。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Jun;86(5):8764. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8764. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
3
The effect of career awareness on perceived career and talent development self-efficacy and career barriers among nursing students.
职业认知对护理专业学生的职业感知、才能发展自我效能感及职业障碍的影响。
J Res Nurs. 2019 Jun;24(3-4):233-247. doi: 10.1177/1744987118807259. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
4
Exploring career development through a student-directed practicum to provide individualized learning experiences.通过学生主导的实习探索职业发展,提供个性化的学习体验。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 May;13(5):500-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
The effect of time management training on time management and anxiety among nursing undergraduates.时间管理训练对护理本科生时间管理和焦虑的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2021 Oct;26(9):1073-1078. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1778751. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
6
The effectiveness of a career efficacy enhancement program for KOREAN nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.韩国护理学生职业效能增强方案的效果:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104423. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104423. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
Outcomes of Student-Driven, Faculty-Mentored Research and Impact on Postgraduate Training and Career Selection.学生主导、教师指导的研究成果及其对研究生培训和职业选择的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 May;82(4):6246. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6246.
8
An evidence-based analysis of learning practices: the need for pharmacy students to employ more effective study strategies.基于证据的学习实践分析:药学专业学生需要采用更有效的学习策略。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Mar-Apr;9(2):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.003. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
A Qualitative Study of Motivating Factors for Pharmacy Student Leadership.药学专业学生领导力激励因素的定性研究
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):114. doi: 10.5688/ajpe816114.
10
Educating for empathy. A review.培养同理心。一篇综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):524-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00443.x.